Fact Check: On June 12, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that courts cannot apply a higher standard to block lawsuits for damages in some disability discrimination claims compared to others.

Fact Check: On June 12, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that courts cannot apply a higher standard to block lawsuits for damages in some disability discrimination claims compared to others.

June 15, 2025by TruthOrFake AI
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "On June 12, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that courts cannot apply a higher standard to block lawsuits for damages in ...

Fact Check: "On June 12, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that courts cannot apply a higher standard to block lawsuits for damages in some disability discrimination claims compared to others."

What We Know

On June 12, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a unanimous ruling regarding disability discrimination claims, specifically in the context of education. The case centered around Ava Tharpe, a teenager with severe epilepsy, whose family sued a Minnesota school district for failing to provide appropriate accommodations. The Supreme Court's decision overturned a previous ruling by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, which had imposed a higher standard of proof for the Tharpe family's claims. Chief Justice John Roberts stated that the challenges faced by students with disabilities should not include a more stringent standard of proof than that applied to other plaintiffs in discrimination cases (NPR, New York Times).

The ruling emphasized that the legal standards for proving discrimination should be consistent across cases, thereby making it easier for students with disabilities to pursue lawsuits against educational institutions (Reuters, AP News).

Analysis

The Supreme Court's ruling is significant for several reasons. Firstly, it clarifies that courts cannot impose a higher burden of proof on disability discrimination claims compared to other types of discrimination claims. This decision is seen as a victory for disability rights advocates, who argue that such a higher standard could deter legitimate claims and undermine protections for disabled students (USA Today, Education Week).

The sources cited provide a consistent narrative regarding the implications of the ruling. NPR and the New York Times both highlight the unanimous nature of the decision and its potential impact on future cases involving disability discrimination. The NPR article notes that the ruling allows families to better advocate for their children's educational rights, which is crucial for those who may lack resources to fight lengthy legal battles (NPR).

However, the ruling does not specify what standard should be applied moving forward, leaving some ambiguity. This could lead to variations in how lower courts interpret the ruling in future cases (NPR, AP News). The potential for differing interpretations underscores the importance of ongoing advocacy and legal clarity in disability rights.

Conclusion

The claim that "On June 12, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that courts cannot apply a higher standard to block lawsuits for damages in some disability discrimination claims compared to others" is True. The ruling explicitly states that all plaintiffs, including those with disabilities, should be held to the same standard of proof in discrimination cases, thereby reinforcing equal access to legal recourse for disabled individuals.

Sources

  1. PDF Supreme Court of The United States
  2. Unanimous Supreme Court makes it easier to sue schools in disability cases
  3. Supreme Court Sides With Teenager in School Disability Discrimination
  4. Supreme Court rules for girl with epilepsy in case over access to education
  5. US Supreme Court bolsters school disability protections
  6. Disability rights groups won big at the Supreme Court. The fight isn't over.
  7. Supreme Court Decision Lets Students Sue Schools More Easily for Disability Bias

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Cristina Fernández de Kirchner confirmed she will surrender to authorities on June 18, 2023, following a Supreme Court ruling that upheld her six-year prison sentence and lifelong ban from public office in a corruption case.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Cristina Fernández de Kirchner confirmed she will surrender to authorities on June 18, 2023, following a Supreme Court ruling that upheld her six-year prison sentence and lifelong ban from public office in a corruption case.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Cristina Fernández de Kirchner confirmed she will surrender to authorities on June 18, 2023, following a Supreme Court ruling that upheld her six-year prison sentence and lifelong ban from public office in a corruption case.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Rustam Minnikhanov, head of the Republic of Tatarstan, reported a Ukrainian drone attack on the Yelabuga district on June 15, 2023.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Rustam Minnikhanov, head of the Republic of Tatarstan, reported a Ukrainian drone attack on the Yelabuga district on June 15, 2023.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Rustam Minnikhanov, head of the Republic of Tatarstan, reported a Ukrainian drone attack on the Yelabuga district on June 15, 2023.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: On June 15, 2023, Ukraine’s General Staff confirmed a strike on a drone production facility in Yelabuga, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: On June 15, 2023, Ukraine’s General Staff confirmed a strike on a drone production facility in Yelabuga, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: On June 15, 2023, Ukraine’s General Staff confirmed a strike on a drone production facility in Yelabuga, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Pakistan's Defense Minister Khwaja Asif stated on June 14, 2023, that Muslim nations should unite against Israel and called for the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) to convene to formulate a joint strategy.
True

Fact Check: Pakistan's Defense Minister Khwaja Asif stated on June 14, 2023, that Muslim nations should unite against Israel and called for the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) to convene to formulate a joint strategy.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Pakistan's Defense Minister Khwaja Asif stated on June 14, 2023, that Muslim nations should unite against Israel and called for the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) to convene to formulate a joint strategy.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
🔍
True

Fact Check: At around 4 a.m. on June 14, 2023, agents of the Defense Intelligence of Ukraine attacked a substation in Kaliningrad, Russia, resulting in a power outage for local military industry facilities and the Russian armed forces.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: At around 4 a.m. on June 14, 2023, agents of the Defense Intelligence of Ukraine attacked a substation in Kaliningrad, Russia, resulting in a power outage for local military industry facilities and the Russian armed forces.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The 'No Kings' protest in Salt Lake City on June 14, 2023, was the largest of nearly a dozen protests that took place in Utah on that day.
True

Fact Check: The 'No Kings' protest in Salt Lake City on June 14, 2023, was the largest of nearly a dozen protests that took place in Utah on that day.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The 'No Kings' protest in Salt Lake City on June 14, 2023, was the largest of nearly a dozen protests that took place in Utah on that day.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: On June 12, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that courts cannot apply a higher standard to block lawsuits for damages in some disability discrimination claims compared to others. | TruthOrFake Blog