Fact Check: the deficit is currently running more than 6% of gross domestic product

Fact Check: the deficit is currently running more than 6% of gross domestic product

June 14, 2025by TruthOrFake AI
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "The deficit is currently running more than 6% of gross domestic product" ## What We Know The claim that "the deficit is currently runn...

Fact Check: "The deficit is currently running more than 6% of gross domestic product"

What We Know

The claim that "the deficit is currently running more than 6% of gross domestic product" is supported by recent data. According to the CBO, the federal deficit for the fiscal year 2023 was reported at $1.7 trillion, which corresponds to approximately 6.3% of the gross domestic product (GDP). This figure aligns with other reputable sources, including the U.S. Treasury Fiscal Data, which also indicates that the deficit is a significant percentage of GDP. Furthermore, the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis corroborates this data, showing the federal deficit as a percentage of GDP hovering around 6.3% for the year.

Analysis

The evidence supporting the claim is robust, with multiple credible sources confirming that the federal deficit for 2023 is indeed over 6% of GDP. The CBO is a nonpartisan agency that provides economic data and analysis, making its reports highly reliable. The U.S. Treasury Fiscal Data is also an authoritative source, as it is the official government site for financial data, ensuring accuracy and transparency.

However, some sources, such as the Bipartisan Policy Center, indicate fluctuations in the deficit, showing that it can vary significantly from month to month. For instance, they reported a deficit of $255 billion for October 2024, which reflects ongoing trends in federal spending and revenue collection. Despite these fluctuations, the overall annual figure remains above the 6% mark, as confirmed by the CBO and other financial analyses.

Critically, while some sources report slightly different percentages (e.g., 6.2% from US Government Spending), the consensus remains that the deficit is indeed running at or above 6% of GDP for the fiscal year 2023. The variations can be attributed to different methodologies in calculating GDP and deficits, but the core claim stands validated.

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim that "the deficit is currently running more than 6% of gross domestic product" is accurate based on the available data. The federal deficit for fiscal year 2023 was reported at 6.3% of GDP by multiple reliable sources, including the CBO and the U.S. Treasury. This confirms that the statement is factually correct.

Sources

  1. The Federal Budget in Fiscal Year 2023: An Infographic
  2. National Deficit | U.S. Treasury Fiscal Data
  3. Publications & Cost Estimates
  4. Federal Surplus or Deficit [-] as Percent of Gross Domestic ...
  5. Deficit Tracker
  6. United States Federal Government Budget
  7. US Federal Deficit as Percent of GDP
  8. 7 Charts that Show How the Nation's Fiscal Outlook ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: the deficit is currently running more than 6% of gross domestic product
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: the deficit is currently running more than 6% of gross domestic product

Detailed fact-check analysis of: the deficit is currently running more than 6% of gross domestic product

Jun 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: the deficit totaled just more than $316 billion for the month
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: the deficit totaled just more than $316 billion for the month

Detailed fact-check analysis of: the deficit totaled just more than $316 billion for the month

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: the deficit totaled just more than $316 billion for the month
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: the deficit totaled just more than $316 billion for the month

Detailed fact-check analysis of: the deficit totaled just more than $316 billion for the month

Jun 13, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: There is no question Mark Carney is a brilliant business man and has a very impressive resume. But does he give a shit about you, and for that matter other Canadians? I didn't know anything about Mark Carney a couple of weeks ago and yesterday, I decided to do a little research project. This is what I discovered with about 1 hour of research. Lets take a bit of a dive in… Mark Carney is the UN special envoy on climate change pushing governments around the world to adopt “clean energy”. A great position, no? Interestingly, right up until he entered the Liberal leadership race, he also conveniently sat on the board of Brookfield Asset Management at the same time as he sat in this position with the UN. Brookfield owns $1 trillion in assets under management and many of their portfolios are across renewable power & infrastructure. Hmm, sounds a little conflicty? He has directly profited off of the shutting down and blocking of fossil fuel projects in Canada which he advised Canada to do (and other nations) while making sure so called “green energy” options are pushed and approved, which line his own pockets with green. One of Mark's acts as Chair of the board was to move the head office of Brookfield from Toronto to New York, because of the impending tariff war. Sounds like he has a lot of faith in his ability to put Canada first...and then he lied about the whole situation claiming that he was not chair when Brookfield moved. Maybe true, but he approved the move and voted for it at the first hint of tariffs from Trump, while he was still chair… Let’s look further at Mark’s role with Brookfield though. While he was doing all this “good work”, or rather making western governments do all this good work while he profits off of them, he was also directing Brookfield to act completely contrary environmentally when it suits the firm and their shareholders. While Brookfield manages green companies, they also acquire and invest in “dirty” fossil fuel projects and “carbon releasing” in other parts of the world. “One of Brookfield's collection of assets was 267,000 hectares in Brazil. producing soybeans, sugar, corn and cattle. between 2012 and 2021 Brookfield's subsidiaries deforested around 9,000 hectares on eight large farms in the Cerrado region of Brazil, a vast area bordering the Amazon rainforest. The report estimates that 600,000 tonnes of CO2 was emitted by deforesting these areas, the equivalent of 1.2 million flights from London to New York. A spokesperson for Brookfield said: "Brookfield made limited investments in Brazil's agriculture sector during the last decade. The decision to sell these businesses was taken several years ago because the fund they were held in was reaching the end of its life, and we therefore had an obligation to return capital to investors." Global Witness claims that this decision to sell clashes with public statements subsequently made by Mr. Carney as a global leader on climate policy, which call upon companies not to sell off climate-damaging assets, but to hold onto them and either clean them up or close them down”. - Ben King, BBC 15, Dec, 2022 They cut 9000 hectares of prime forest on the border of the Amazon to expand their GMO farming operations. Wow! How about the $16 billion acquisition of Inter Pipeline by Brookfield”? An oil pipeline, yes. Just two of the many "CO2 emitting" actions that Mark Carney has directed Brookfield on as Chair to the Board while he pushes green energy where it benefits his own books… A 2023 report on Brookfield by “Private Equity Climate Risks” paint a pretty bleak picture. "The combined current fossil fuel investments of Brookfield and Oaktree emit an estimated 159 million metric tons (mt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. This is an order of magnitude more than the 11.8 million mt CO2e disclosed in Brookfield’s sustainability reports". So… will Carney be good for Canada? Well all of the above makes me think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing and let’s keep in mind he has been a close financial advisor to Trudeau since 2020. All of the great results of Trudeau’s tenure are the direct result of Carney. Doubling of house prices Record inflation Doubling of Canadians in the line of the food bank Our now crippling national debt and $60 billion deficit One of the biggest red flags for me is that Mark refuses to disclose his own personal financial situation. A guy who just a couple of months ago sat on 20 different corporate boards, including many American companies, promises he has a lot to gain by becoming PM. He is an ultra elite globalist who is 100% a part of the decisions that have led to Canada’s downfall and left us so vulnerable and if he remains as PM for any length of time, I feel Canada may end up bankrupt. The media will tell you that Mark is the guy to take on Trump, but the truth is not hard to uncover if you just do a little digging. Centrum

Detailed fact-check analysis of: There is no question Mark Carney is a brilliant business man and has a very impressive resume. But does he give a shit about you, and for that matter other Canadians? I didn't know anything about Mark Carney a couple of weeks ago and yesterday, I decided to do a little research project. This is what I discovered with about 1 hour of research. Lets take a bit of a dive in… Mark Carney is the UN special envoy on climate change pushing governments around the world to adopt “clean energy”. A great position, no? Interestingly, right up until he entered the Liberal leadership race, he also conveniently sat on the board of Brookfield Asset Management at the same time as he sat in this position with the UN. Brookfield owns $1 trillion in assets under management and many of their portfolios are across renewable power & infrastructure. Hmm, sounds a little conflicty? He has directly profited off of the shutting down and blocking of fossil fuel projects in Canada which he advised Canada to do (and other nations) while making sure so called “green energy” options are pushed and approved, which line his own pockets with green. One of Mark's acts as Chair of the board was to move the head office of Brookfield from Toronto to New York, because of the impending tariff war. Sounds like he has a lot of faith in his ability to put Canada first...and then he lied about the whole situation claiming that he was not chair when Brookfield moved. Maybe true, but he approved the move and voted for it at the first hint of tariffs from Trump, while he was still chair… Let’s look further at Mark’s role with Brookfield though. While he was doing all this “good work”, or rather making western governments do all this good work while he profits off of them, he was also directing Brookfield to act completely contrary environmentally when it suits the firm and their shareholders. While Brookfield manages green companies, they also acquire and invest in “dirty” fossil fuel projects and “carbon releasing” in other parts of the world. “One of Brookfield's collection of assets was 267,000 hectares in Brazil. producing soybeans, sugar, corn and cattle. between 2012 and 2021 Brookfield's subsidiaries deforested around 9,000 hectares on eight large farms in the Cerrado region of Brazil, a vast area bordering the Amazon rainforest. The report estimates that 600,000 tonnes of CO2 was emitted by deforesting these areas, the equivalent of 1.2 million flights from London to New York. A spokesperson for Brookfield said: "Brookfield made limited investments in Brazil's agriculture sector during the last decade. The decision to sell these businesses was taken several years ago because the fund they were held in was reaching the end of its life, and we therefore had an obligation to return capital to investors." Global Witness claims that this decision to sell clashes with public statements subsequently made by Mr. Carney as a global leader on climate policy, which call upon companies not to sell off climate-damaging assets, but to hold onto them and either clean them up or close them down”. - Ben King, BBC 15, Dec, 2022 They cut 9000 hectares of prime forest on the border of the Amazon to expand their GMO farming operations. Wow! How about the $16 billion acquisition of Inter Pipeline by Brookfield”? An oil pipeline, yes. Just two of the many "CO2 emitting" actions that Mark Carney has directed Brookfield on as Chair to the Board while he pushes green energy where it benefits his own books… A 2023 report on Brookfield by “Private Equity Climate Risks” paint a pretty bleak picture. "The combined current fossil fuel investments of Brookfield and Oaktree emit an estimated 159 million metric tons (mt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. This is an order of magnitude more than the 11.8 million mt CO2e disclosed in Brookfield’s sustainability reports". So… will Carney be good for Canada? Well all of the above makes me think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing and let’s keep in mind he has been a close financial advisor to Trudeau since 2020. All of the great results of Trudeau’s tenure are the direct result of Carney. Doubling of house prices Record inflation Doubling of Canadians in the line of the food bank Our now crippling national debt and $60 billion deficit One of the biggest red flags for me is that Mark refuses to disclose his own personal financial situation. A guy who just a couple of months ago sat on 20 different corporate boards, including many American companies, promises he has a lot to gain by becoming PM. He is an ultra elite globalist who is 100% a part of the decisions that have led to Canada’s downfall and left us so vulnerable and if he remains as PM for any length of time, I feel Canada may end up bankrupt. The media will tell you that Mark is the guy to take on Trump, but the truth is not hard to uncover if you just do a little digging. Centrum

Mar 24, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Ford is currently awaiting approval for applications with China's Ministry of Commerce to export more rare earths, according to CEO Jim Farley.
True

Fact Check: Ford is currently awaiting approval for applications with China's Ministry of Commerce to export more rare earths, according to CEO Jim Farley.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Ford is currently awaiting approval for applications with China's Ministry of Commerce to export more rare earths, according to CEO Jim Farley.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Governor Gavin Newsom requested an additional $2.8 billion loan to address a deficit in California's Medicaid program, which has exceeded budget expectations due to coverage for illegal immigrants.
True

Fact Check: Governor Gavin Newsom requested an additional $2.8 billion loan to address a deficit in California's Medicaid program, which has exceeded budget expectations due to coverage for illegal immigrants.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Governor Gavin Newsom requested an additional $2.8 billion loan to address a deficit in California's Medicaid program, which has exceeded budget expectations due to coverage for illegal immigrants.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →