Fact Check: Sonia Sotomayor: 94/100
Ketanji Brown Jackson: 92/100
Samuel A. Alito Jr.: 90/100
John G. Roberts Jr.: 88/100
Brett M. Kavanaugh: 88/100
Neil M. Gorsuch: 86/100
Elena Kagan: 84/100
Amy Coney Barrett: 80/100
Clarence Thomas: 78/100

Fact Check: Sonia Sotomayor: 94/100 Ketanji Brown Jackson: 92/100 Samuel A. Alito Jr.: 90/100 John G. Roberts Jr.: 88/100 Brett M. Kavanaugh: 88/100 Neil M. Gorsuch: 86/100 Elena Kagan: 84/100 Amy Coney Barrett: 80/100 Clarence Thomas: 78/100

Published July 30, 2025
?
VERDICT
Unverified

# Fact-Check Article: Supreme Court Justices Ratings Claim ## What We Know The claim presents a list of ratings for current Supreme Court Justices, ...

Advertisement
NordVPN - Explore the internet securely and privately

Secure your internet browsing withNordVPN's trusted protection

Fact-Check Article: Supreme Court Justices Ratings Claim

What We Know

The claim presents a list of ratings for current Supreme Court Justices, assigning numerical scores to each based on unspecified criteria. The justices mentioned are:

  • Sonia Sotomayor: 94/100
  • Ketanji Brown Jackson: 92/100
  • Samuel A. Alito Jr.: 90/100
  • John G. Roberts Jr.: 88/100
  • Brett M. Kavanaugh: 88/100
  • Neil M. Gorsuch: 86/100
  • Elena Kagan: 84/100
  • Amy Coney Barrett: 80/100
  • Clarence Thomas: 78/100

As of October 2023, the current members of the Supreme Court include Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Samuel A. Alito Jr., John G. Roberts Jr., Brett M. Kavanaugh, Neil M. Gorsuch, Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett, and Clarence Thomas. Each justice has a distinct background and has been appointed by different presidents over the years (Current Members, The Current Supreme Court - Constitutional Law).

Analysis

The claim lacks a clear source or methodology for how the ratings were determined. Without a credible source or context, it is impossible to verify the accuracy of these scores. The Supreme Court does not officially rate its justices in this manner, and the criteria for such ratings are not specified in the claim.

The justices' qualifications and backgrounds are well-documented. For instance, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson are noted for their significant legal careers and contributions to the judiciary (Current Members, The Current Supreme Court - Constitutional Law). However, the claim does not provide any evidence or criteria that would justify the numerical ratings assigned to each justice.

Additionally, the sources available do not support the claim. They primarily focus on biographical information and the current composition of the Supreme Court, rather than any evaluative ratings (Circuit Assignments, 2024 -2025 Supreme Court Highlights). The absence of a reputable source or study that provides these ratings raises concerns about the reliability of the claim.

Conclusion

Verdict: Unverified

The claim regarding the ratings of Supreme Court Justices is unverified due to a lack of credible sources, methodology, and context. Without evidence to support these scores, it remains an unsupported assertion.

Sources

  1. Current Members
  2. The Current Supreme Court - Constitutional Law
  3. Circuit Assignments - Supreme Court of the United States
  4. 2024 -2025 Supreme Court Highlights - University of Cincinnati
  5. The Supreme Court: Current Justices
  6. Two Liberal SCOTUS Justices Give Trump’s Speech the Cold Shoulder
  7. Supreme Court of the United States
  8. Every liberal Supreme Court justice sits out decision in rare ...
Advertisement
NordVPN - Explore the internet securely and privately

Secure your internet browsing withNordVPN's trusted protection

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: In the 2022-2023 term, Justice Barrett joined Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan in nonunanimous decisions 82% of the time, up from 39% in her first term.
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: In the 2022-2023 term, Justice Barrett joined Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan in nonunanimous decisions 82% of the time, up from 39% in her first term.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In the 2022-2023 term, Justice Barrett joined Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan in nonunanimous decisions 82% of the time, up from 39% in her first term.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, stated that adopting higher standards would 'eviscerate the core' of disability discrimination laws.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, stated that adopting higher standards would 'eviscerate the core' of disability discrimination laws.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, stated that adopting higher standards would 'eviscerate the core' of disability discrimination laws.

Jun 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Chief Justice John Roberts Caught in Elitist Club of Judges and Lawyers That Includes James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta and Ketanji Brown Jackson
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Chief Justice John Roberts Caught in Elitist Club of Judges and Lawyers That Includes James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta and Ketanji Brown Jackson

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Chief Justice John Roberts Caught in Elitist Club of Judges and Lawyers That Includes James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta and Ketanji Brown Jackson

Mar 23, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Ketanji Brown Jackson was hired solely to fulfill Biden's DEI agenda.
Partially True

Fact Check: Ketanji Brown Jackson was hired solely to fulfill Biden's DEI agenda.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Ketanji Brown Jackson was hired solely to fulfill Biden's DEI agenda.

Jul 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warns ruling harms civil rights protections.
True

Fact Check: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warns ruling harms civil rights protections.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warns ruling harms civil rights protections.

Jun 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warns of tangible harm from the Supreme Court's ruling.
True

Fact Check: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warns of tangible harm from the Supreme Court's ruling.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warns of tangible harm from the Supreme Court's ruling.

Jun 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Sonia Sotomayor: 94/100 Ketanji Brown Jackson: 92/100 Samuel A. Alito Jr.: 90/100 John G. Roberts Jr.: 88/100 Brett M. Kavanaugh: 88/100 Neil M. Gorsuch: 86/100 Elena Kagan: 84/100 Amy Coney Barrett: 80/100 Clarence Thomas: 78/100 | TruthOrFake Blog