TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Chief Justice John Roberts Caught in Elitist Club of Judges and Lawyers That Includes James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta and Ketanji Brown Jackson

Fact Check: Chief Justice John Roberts Caught in Elitist Club of Judges and Lawyers That Includes James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta and Ketanji Brown Jackson

March 23, 2025•by TruthOrFake
✗
VERDICT
False

# Chief Justice John Roberts Caught in Elitist Club of Judges and Lawyers That Includes James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta and Ketanji Brown Jac...

Chief Justice John Roberts Caught in Elitist Club of Judges and Lawyers That Includes James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta and Ketanji Brown Jackson

Introduction

Recent claims circulating on social media allege that Chief Justice John Roberts is part of an "elitist club" of judges and lawyers, which purportedly includes judges such as James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. These assertions suggest that this group operates in secrecy and has a coordinated agenda against former President Donald Trump. The claims have sparked significant discussion and controversy, particularly among political commentators and social media users.

What We Know

  1. Membership in the American Inns of Court: The group referred to in these claims is the American Inns of Court, a national organization that promotes excellence in legal advocacy and ethics through mentorship and education. Membership is typically open to judges, lawyers, and law students, and it is not inherently secretive or elitist in nature. The organization aims to foster professional development and collegiality among its members 14.

  2. Judicial Backgrounds: The judges mentioned—James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta, and Ketanji Brown Jackson—are all prominent figures within the U.S. judiciary. For instance, Ketanji Brown Jackson is currently an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, while Boasberg and Howell serve as judges in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia 18.

  3. Context of Claims: The claims emerged following Chief Justice Roberts' public defense of the judiciary against calls for impeachment from the Trump administration, which some commentators interpreted as a sign of judicial independence 13. The allegations of a "secret club" appear to be a reaction to this defense, suggesting a conspiracy among judges to undermine Trump 23.

Analysis

The sources reporting on this claim vary significantly in credibility and bias:

  • Mainstream Media: The Associated Press (AP) and other reputable outlets like MEAWW News have published fact-checks that clarify the nature of the American Inns of Court and debunk the notion of a secretive agenda among its members 13. These sources are generally considered reliable due to their adherence to journalistic standards and fact-checking protocols.

  • Partisan Sources: In contrast, outlets like The Gateway Pundit and other similar platforms have presented the claims without substantial evidence, often framing the judges in a derogatory manner as "radical" or "anti-Trump" 26. Such language indicates a clear bias and suggests that these sources may have an agenda to discredit certain judicial figures based on political affiliations.

  • Anonymous Claims: Some of the claims originate from social media posts and anonymous sources, which lack verifiable evidence and should be treated with skepticism. For instance, assertions made by users on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) often lack context and can be exaggerated or misinterpreted 3.

Methodological Concerns

The methodology behind the claims often involves selective quoting and a lack of context regarding the American Inns of Court's activities. The insinuation that membership equates to a conspiratorial agenda against Trump is not substantiated by any credible evidence. Additionally, the framing of the judges as "elitist" or "radical" is subjective and reflects the biases of the sources rather than objective analysis.

What Additional Information Would Be Helpful

To further evaluate the validity of these claims, additional information would be beneficial, including:

  • Direct statements or evidence from the American Inns of Court regarding their membership policies and activities.
  • Detailed accounts of any meetings or communications among the judges in question that could substantiate claims of a coordinated agenda.
  • Independent analyses from legal experts on the implications of such memberships on judicial impartiality.

Conclusion

Verdict: False

The claims that Chief Justice John Roberts is part of an "elitist club" of judges and lawyers with a secretive agenda against former President Donald Trump are unfounded. Key evidence includes the nature of the American Inns of Court, which is a transparent organization focused on legal advocacy and ethics, rather than a clandestine group. Furthermore, the judges mentioned are established figures within the judiciary, and the allegations appear to stem from a misinterpretation of their professional affiliations and activities.

It is important to note that while the claims have generated significant attention, they lack credible substantiation. The sources promoting these assertions often exhibit bias and fail to provide verifiable evidence. As such, readers should approach such claims with skepticism and consider the broader context in which they arise.

Limitations in the available evidence include the reliance on partisan sources and social media claims, which often lack rigorous fact-checking. Therefore, while the conclusion is based on the current understanding of the situation, ongoing scrutiny and critical evaluation of information are essential for a well-rounded perspective. Readers are encouraged to independently assess the validity of claims and seek out reliable sources for information.

Sources

  1. AP News. "FACT FOCUS: Posts falsely claim federal judiciary members are in secret club, undermining Trump." AP News
  2. The Gateway Pundit. "REVEALED: Chief Justice John Roberts Caught in Elitist Club of Judges and Lawyers That Includes James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta and Ketanji Brown Jackson." Gateway Pundit
  3. MEAWW News. "Fact Check: Are John Roberts and James Boasberg in 'secretive, invite-only club' working against Trump?" MEAWW News
  4. Townhall. "Update: Social Media Falsely Claims Chief Justice John Roberts Is In Secret Club of Judges." Townhall
  5. Three Percent Nation. "Chief Justice John Roberts Linked to Elite Judges and Lawyers Club with Boasberg, Howell, Mehta, and Ketanji Brown Jackson." Three Percent Nation
  6. Free Republic. "REVEALED: Chief Justice John Roberts Caught in Elitist Club of Judges and Lawyers." Free Republic
  7. Sott.net. "Chief Justice John Roberts caught in invite-only club of judges and lawyers called America Inns of Court." Sott.net
  8. Headline USA. "Chief Justice Roberts Exposed as Member of Elitist Club Composed of Anti-Trump." Headline USA
  9. AP News. "FACT FOCUS: Posts falsely claim federal judiciary members are." AP News

Got your own claim to verify? It's 100% Free!

Join thousands who trust our AI-powered fact-checking. Completely free with no registration required. Your claim could be the next important truth we uncover.

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Exposed: FBI in Emergency Operation to Protect Epstein’s Elite Pedophile Network — Over 1,000 Agents Reassigned to Bury the Truth Before Trump Releases the Bombshell Files! The FBI has officially declared war on truth. What’s happening in their New York office isn’t justice — it’s a high-level operation to protect child traffickers in suits, crowns, and boardrooms. Trump is forcing their hand. He holds the full list — unredacted. And now, over 1,000 FBI agents have been pulled from national security to do one thing: scrub the Epstein files before they go public. Think about that. While cartels flood the border, foreign threats rise, and Americans suffer — the FBI is pulling 12-hour overnight shifts to protect rapists of children. They're not investigating — they’re sanitizing evidence to keep the power structure intact. This is a deep state firewall operation. Agents have been ordered to redact victims’ info — but leave Epstein’s associates untouched. The monsters stay anonymous. The system stays safe. It’s not a mistake. It’s a plan. This isn’t about Epstein. It never was. This is about the ones he served — the shadow government. The ones who blackmailed politicians, compromised world leaders, and used Epstein’s island as a trap. The names in those files could shatter the global order. Judges. Tech CEOs. Media puppeteers. Royals. Intelligence assets. Trump isn’t playing their game anymore. He forced the release of JFK files last week — fully unredacted. He knows it’s all connected: JFK, MLK, Epstein. All silenced by the same machine. And now the machine is glitching. FBI’s NY field director James Dennehy was forced to resign days after the exposure. He didn’t “retire.” He was pushed out. The house of cards is falling, and Trump is pulling the thread. Pam Bondi promised transparency. She delivered lies. But she accidentally admitted it: SDNY is hiding thousands more Epstein files. The same courts that protected Epstein are still protecting the network. But Trump already has everything. That’s why they’re panicking. That’s why agents are sleeping in the office. Not to save you — to save the elites. The redactions mean nothing. The real files are coming. And when they hit — it won’t just expose Epstein. It will expose the entire shadow empire: banks, royalty, Hollywood, Big Pharma, the Vatican. This is the collapse. Trump broke the firewall. They can’t stop what’s coming. Tick-tock.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Exposed: FBI in Emergency Operation to Protect Epstein’s Elite Pedophile Network — Over 1,000 Agents...

Apr 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Federal judges petition to impeach roberts
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Federal judges petition to impeach roberts

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Federal judges petition to impeach roberts

Apr 9, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: It is all about 1948. It's not about October 7, 1956, 1967, 1982, 2008, 2014 or any other date on which Israel committed egregious atrocities in and around Palestine; it's all about 1948, and it's important to remember this date well. The war and the complete failure of all attempts to achieve a viable peace have pushed Palestine back to this date. The 76 years that have passed have been a fruitless struggle for 'peace'. All they have done is give Israel four decades to reinforce its total control over Palestine. This is all about history. Understanding the struggle for Palestine requires understanding its historical context. The modern history commences with Britain using the Zionists, while simultaneously being utilized by them, to establish an imperial foothold in the Middle East, effectively transforming Israel into the central pillar of a bridge from Egypt and the Nile to Iraq, its oil, and the Gulf. The calculations were devoid of morality, driven solely by self-interest. Britain had no right to cede a portion of the area it was occupying—Palestine—to another occupier, and the UN similarly lacked the authority to do so. The 1947 General Assembly partition resolution was essentially a US resolution anyway; the numbers were fixed by the White House once it became clear that it would fail. Chaim Weizmann, the prominent Zionist leader in London and Washington, requested Truman's intervention. “I am aware of how much abstaining delegations would be swayed by your counsel and the influence of your government,” he informed the president. “I refer to China, Honduras, Colombia, Mexico, Liberia, Ethiopia, Greece. I beg and pray for your decisive intervention at this decisive hour.” Among the countries that needed a push were the Philippines, Cuba, Haiti, and France. “We went for it," stated Clark Clifford, Truman’s special counsel, subsequently. “It was because the White House was for it that it went through. I kept the ramrod up the State Department’s butt.” Herschel Johnson, the deputy chief of the US mission at the UN, cried in frustration while speaking to Loy Henderson, a senior diplomat and head of the State Department’s Office of Near Eastern Affairs, who was a staunch adversary of the construction of a Zionist settler state in Palestine. “Loy, forgive me for breaking down like this,” Johnson stated, “but Dave Niles called us here a couple of days ago and said that the president had instructed him to tell us that, by God, he wanted us to get busy and get all the votes that we possibly could, that there would be hell if the voting went the other way.” In September, UNSCOP (the United Nations Special Committee on Palestine) convened an ad hoc committee to evaluate its proposals. The committee consisted of all members of the General Assembly, with subcommittees designated to evaluate the suggestions presented. On November 25, the General Assembly, acting as an ad hoc committee, approved partition with a vote of 25 in favor, 13 against, and 17 abstentions. A two-thirds majority was required for the partition resolution to succeed in the General Assembly plenary session four days later, indicating its impending failure. However, following the White House's endorsement, seven of the 17 abstainers from November 25 voted 'yes' on November 29, resulting in the passage of Resolution 181 (II) with 33 votes in favor, 13 against, and 10 abstentions. Niles, the Zionists' ‘point man’ at the White House, subsequently partnered with Clark Clifford to undermine the State Department's proposal to replace partition with trusteeship for the time being because of the violence threatened in Palestine. Niles was the first member of a series of Zionist lobbyists sent to monitor the presidency from within. Despite their unpopularity and potential resentment, the presidents had no choice but to tolerate their persistent pressure. During John Kennedy's administration, Mike (Myer) Feldman was permitted to oversee all State Department and White House cable concerning the Middle East. Despite internal opposition within the White House, Kennedy perceived Feldman “as a necessary evil whose highly visible White House position was a political debt that had to be paid,” as noted by Seymour Hersh in The Samson Option. Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign Policy (p. 98). Lyndon Johnson took over Feldman after Kennedy's assassination, granting Israel all its demands without offering anything in return. The transfer of Palestine to a recent settler minority contravened fundamental UN norms, including the right to self-determination. Resistance to Zionism and the formation of a Jewish state in Palestine were significant within the US administration, but it was the man in the White House, influenced by domestic interests (money and votes), who called the shots and has been calling them ever since. Palestine went from British control to American hands, and then to the Zionists. 29 November 1947 - partition plans. 33 voted for, 13 voted against, 10 abstained The desires of the Palestinians were irrelevant to the 'return' of the Jewish people to their ''ancient homeland'', as noted by Arthur Balfour. The fact that Jews could not 'return’ to a land in which they or their ancestors had never lived was equally immaterial. What went on behind closed doors to ensure the establishment of a colonial-settler state in Palestine, contrary to the desires of its populace, represents but one episode in a protracted history of duplicity, deceit, persistent breaches of international law, and violations of fundamental UN principles. The so-called "Palestine problem" has never been a "Palestine problem," but rather a Western and Zionist problem—a volatile combination of the two that the perpetrators are still blaming on their victims. There would be no ambiguity regarding our current situation at the precipice if Western governments and the media held Israel accountable rather than shielding, endorsing, and rationalizing even the most egregious offenses under the pretext of Israel's 'right' to self-defense. It is absurd to propose that a thief has any form of 'right' to 'defend' stolen property. The right belongs to the person fighting for its return, as the Palestinians have been doing daily since 1948. Aside from the 5–6% of land acquired by Zionist purchasing agencies before 1948, Israelis are living on and in stolen property. They will defend it, but they have no 'right' to defend something that, by any legal, moral, historical, or cultural measure, belongs to someone else. This has never been a 'conflict of rights' as 'liberal' Zionists have claimed, because a right is a right and cannot conflict with another right. The real rights in this context are evident, or would be, if they were not persistently suppressed by Western governments and a media that unconditionally safeguards Israel's actions. Although the non-binding UNGA partition resolution of that year did not include a 'transfer' of the Palestinian population, the creation of a Jewish state would have been more challenging without it. Without the expulsion of indigenous Palestinians, the demographic composition of the 'Jewish state' would have included an equal number of Palestinian Muslims and Christians alongside Jews. War was the sole means of getting rid of Palestinian natives; raw force achieved what Theodor Herzl envisioned when he referred to “spiriting” the “penniless population” from their land. Upon its completion, Weizmann expressed excitement regarding this "miraculous simplification of our task." Following 1948, there were massacres in the West Bank, Gaza, and Jordan; massacres in Lebanon; and wars and assassinations throughout the region and beyond. A second wave of ethnic cleansing succeeded the 1948 one in 1967, and now a third and fourth wave is taking place in Gaza and southern Lebanon, terrorizing and slaughtering town dwellers and villagers into fleeing. https://preview.redd.it/orxl88k6mfoe1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=12103a2b560e3af2f72c656e6e39fdbea64caa11 Western governments and the media are facilitating the gradual, covert, illegal, and pseudo-legal erosion of Palestinian life and rights in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. It is remarkable how the media constantly discusses October 7 but never talks about any of this critical history. Of course, as an accomplice to one of the biggest crimes of the 20th century, meticulously orchestrated and executed violently, discussing it candidly would entail self-incrimination; thus, it diverts the discourse to alternative subjects—''Hamas terrorism'', ''October 7''—anything to distract from Israel's egregious war crimes. This distortion of the narrative has persisted since the PLO and the popular fronts of the 1960s were labeled as terrorists, while Israel was portrayed as a plucky small state merely defending itself. The Poles, the French, and other Europeans opposed the Nazi occupation. The distinction is clear: resistance to occupation by Palestinians is labeled as terrorism, while state-sponsored terrorism is characterized as 'self-defense.' This distortion of truth has been outrageously amplified following the pager/walkie-talkie terrorist acts perpetrated by Israel in Lebanon. Western governments and their connected media entities have rationalized and even lauded them. The Palestinians demonstrated their readiness to transcend the events of 1948 and to make significant concessions for peace —22 percent of the land in exchange for relinquishing 78 percent—provided Israel would engage sincerely with the rights of the 1948 generation; nevertheless, Israel ignored their offers contemptuously. The Palestinians were willing to share Jerusalem, but Israel was not receptive to this proposition. It had consistently desired all of Palestine. The Netanyahu government, seeing no need for such concealment, now unveils the truth that the 1990s 'peace process' and previous proposals from various diplomatic entities obscured. It explicitly states its desires, regardless of the opinions of others, including former partners, which align with the initial aspirations of the Zionist movement: all of Palestine, ideally devoid of Palestinians. Israel's refusal to cede any portion of Palestine has blurred the distinctions between the pre- and post-1967 eras. There are no delineating green lines between occupied and unoccupied territories, only the red lines that Israel transgresses daily. Deprived of even a small portion of their homeland, Palestinians and their supporters are compelled to resort to resistance and are resolute in their pursuit of reclaiming all of 1948 Palestine, rather than merely the limited fraction they previously would have accepted. Western countries facilitate and even promote Israel's existence outside international law by providing arms and financial assistance. Israel's occupation, massacres, and assassinations occur because of Western governments' tacit approval and encouragement. If Israel commits genocide, it is due to Western nations' acquiescence and implicit endorsement. If Israel is condemning itself to endless war with those whose fundamental rights it has infringed upon for the past 76 years, it is due to Western governments' acceptance. They have allowed Israel to push the world to the brink of regional and even global conflict. Israel is chaotic, yet it has never been orderly. The West has also permitted this, and it will face consequences.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: It is all about 1948. It's not about October 7, 1956, 1967, 1982, 2008, 2014 or any other date on wh...

Mar 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is AJ Styles John Morrison?
False

Fact Check: Is AJ Styles John Morrison?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is AJ Styles John Morrison?

May 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are Jim and John Harbaugh twins?
False

Fact Check: Are Jim and John Harbaugh twins?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are Jim and John Harbaugh twins?

May 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: There is evidence the CIA were involved in the murder of John F Kennedy
False

Fact Check: There is evidence the CIA were involved in the murder of John F Kennedy

Detailed fact-check analysis of: There is evidence the CIA were involved in the murder of John F Kennedy

Apr 10, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Chief Justice John Roberts Caught in Elitist Club of Judges and Lawyers That Includes James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta and Ketanji Brown Jackson | TruthOrFake Blog