Fact Check: Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, stated that adopting higher standards would 'eviscerate the core' of disability discrimination laws.

Fact Check: Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, stated that adopting higher standards would 'eviscerate the core' of disability discrimination laws.

June 13, 2025by TruthOrFake AI
VERDICT
False

# Fact Check: "Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, stated that adopting higher standards would 'eviscerate the core' of ...

Fact Check: "Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, stated that adopting higher standards would 'eviscerate the core' of disability discrimination laws."

What We Know

The claim revolves around a recent Supreme Court ruling concerning disability discrimination laws, specifically regarding the case of a teenage girl with epilepsy, Ava Tharpe. The Court unanimously decided that the legal standard for suing schools over disability discrimination should not require plaintiffs to demonstrate "bad faith" or "gross misjudgment," which is a higher standard than typically applied in such cases. Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized that the challenges faced by children with disabilities should not include meeting a more stringent standard of proof than other plaintiffs in discrimination cases (NPR, Washington Post).

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in her concurring opinion joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, argued against the imposition of higher standards, stating that doing so would "eviscerate the core" of disability discrimination laws (Washington Post, Education Week). This ruling is seen as a significant win for families seeking to ensure that children with disabilities receive appropriate educational accommodations.

Analysis

The claim that Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Jackson, made a statement about higher standards "eviscerating the core" of disability discrimination laws is accurate. The context of her statement is critical; it was made in response to arguments that suggested a shift towards more stringent legal standards for disability discrimination cases. Sotomayor's assertion reflects a concern that such changes would undermine the protections afforded to individuals with disabilities under existing laws (NPR, CBS News).

The sources reporting on this ruling are credible and come from established news organizations, including NPR and the Washington Post, which are known for their thorough reporting on legal matters. The unanimous nature of the Supreme Court's decision adds weight to the significance of the ruling and the opinions expressed by the justices (Education Week, CBS News).

While Sotomayor's statement is indeed a strong critique of the proposed higher standards, it is essential to understand that her comments were made in the context of a specific legal debate regarding the interpretation of disability laws, rather than a blanket condemnation of all higher standards in legal contexts.

Conclusion

The claim that "Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, stated that adopting higher standards would 'eviscerate the core' of disability discrimination laws" is True. Sotomayor's remarks were made during a Supreme Court ruling that aimed to protect the rights of children with disabilities, emphasizing the importance of maintaining accessible standards in legal proceedings related to disability discrimination.

Sources

  1. Unanimous Supreme Court makes it easier to sue schools ...
  2. Supreme Court win for girl with epilepsy expected to make ...
  3. Supreme Court Decision Lets Students Sue Schools More Easily for ...
  4. Unanimous court rebuffs higher standard for discrimination ...
  5. Minnesota girl with epilepsy wins Supreme Court ruling ... - CBS News

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated that the argument requiring proof of intent to discriminate in disability cases is incorrect based on the statutes' text and history.
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated that the argument requiring proof of intent to discriminate in disability cases is incorrect based on the statutes' text and history.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated that the argument requiring proof of intent to discriminate in disability cases is incorrect based on the statutes' text and history.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In the 2022-2023 term, Justice Barrett joined Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan in nonunanimous decisions 82% of the time, up from 39% in her first term.
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: In the 2022-2023 term, Justice Barrett joined Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan in nonunanimous decisions 82% of the time, up from 39% in her first term.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In the 2022-2023 term, Justice Barrett joined Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan in nonunanimous decisions 82% of the time, up from 39% in her first term.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, expressed willingness to consider higher standards in the future.
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, expressed willingness to consider higher standards in the future.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, expressed willingness to consider higher standards in the future.

Jun 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The senior investigating officer, DCI Guy Laycock, stated that the survivors were pivotal in bringing the abusers to justice by providing testimony during the trial.
True

Fact Check: The senior investigating officer, DCI Guy Laycock, stated that the survivors were pivotal in bringing the abusers to justice by providing testimony during the trial.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The senior investigating officer, DCI Guy Laycock, stated that the survivors were pivotal in bringing the abusers to justice by providing testimony during the trial.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: DCI Guy Laycock stated that the survivors, known as girl A and girl B, were pivotal in bringing the abusers to justice by giving testimony during the trial.
True

Fact Check: DCI Guy Laycock stated that the survivors, known as girl A and girl B, were pivotal in bringing the abusers to justice by giving testimony during the trial.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: DCI Guy Laycock stated that the survivors, known as girl A and girl B, were pivotal in bringing the abusers to justice by giving testimony during the trial.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Ministry of Justice stated that an arrest does not necessarily mean the offender has breached their license conditions, and that James 'Jimmy' Sheen was recalled to prison in May 2020 after evidence of a breach was found.
True

Fact Check: The Ministry of Justice stated that an arrest does not necessarily mean the offender has breached their license conditions, and that James 'Jimmy' Sheen was recalled to prison in May 2020 after evidence of a breach was found.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Ministry of Justice stated that an arrest does not necessarily mean the offender has breached their license conditions, and that James 'Jimmy' Sheen was recalled to prison in May 2020 after evidence of a breach was found.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →