Fact Check: Scott Lively is homophobic
What We Know
Scott Lively is an American evangelical minister known for his strong opposition to LGBTQ+ rights. He has been labeled as "perhaps the most extreme" among U.S. evangelicals who promote anti-gay rhetoric and policies, particularly in countries like Uganda and Russia (Washington Post). Lively has actively advocated for the criminalization of homosexuality, notably suggesting in a 2007 manifesto that Russia should "criminalize the public advocacy of homosexuality," a stance that aligns with the laws enacted in Russia (Washington Post).
In 2012, Lively was sued by the Ugandan group Sexual Minorities Uganda (SMUG) for crimes against humanity, which alleged that his actions contributed to the persecution of LGBTQ+ individuals in Uganda. Although the case was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds, the presiding judge, Michael Ponsor, condemned Lively's actions, stating that he aided "a vicious and frightening campaign of repression against LGBTI people in Uganda" (Human Rights Watch). The judge further noted that Lively's activities violated international law and described his bigotry as "crackpot" (Human Rights Watch).
Analysis
The evidence supporting the claim that Scott Lively is homophobic is substantial and comes from multiple credible sources. His own writings and public statements reflect a consistent pattern of anti-LGBTQ+ sentiment. For instance, he has described homosexuality as a "personality disorder" and has been involved in campaigns that promote severe penalties for LGBTQ+ individuals (Human Rights Campaign).
Moreover, the legal proceedings against him, while ultimately dismissed, highlighted the significant impact of his rhetoric on the persecution of LGBTQ+ individuals in Uganda. The court's acknowledgment of the harm caused by Lively's advocacy lends credence to the assertion that he is not merely expressing personal beliefs but is actively participating in a broader campaign of discrimination and violence against LGBTQ+ communities (Southern Poverty Law Center).
While some may argue that Lively's actions fall under the umbrella of free speech, the implications of his rhetoric and the real-world consequences of his advocacy suggest a more troubling reality. The lack of public repudiation from mainstream Christian leaders regarding Lively's actions further indicates a troubling acceptance of his views within certain evangelical circles (Washington Post).
Conclusion
The claim that Scott Lively is homophobic is True. His extensive history of anti-LGBTQ+ activism, coupled with legal findings that condemn his actions as contributing to persecution, firmly establishes him as a prominent figure in the promotion of homophobia. The evidence from various credible sources supports the assertion that Lively's rhetoric and actions have had harmful effects on LGBTQ+ individuals, particularly in Uganda.
