Fact Check: Mayes remains confident courts will rein in Trump's unconstitutional order
What We Know
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes made a statement following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case of Trump v. CASA. In her remarks, she emphasized that the Supreme Court's ruling does not negate her belief that President Trump's executive order regarding birthright citizenship is unconstitutional. She stated, "Our fight continues... We remain confident that his blatantly unconstitutional order will be reined in by the courts" (Arizona Attorney General's Office, source-1). This sentiment reflects her ongoing commitment to challenge the order in lower courts, asserting that it would cause significant harm to Arizona families and undermine basic freedoms.
The Supreme Court's ruling, which was a 6-3 decision, allows for the possibility that Trump's executive order could take effect in some regions, despite previous rulings from lower courts deeming it unconstitutional (New York Times, source-2). This ruling has raised concerns about the erosion of judicial checks on executive power, particularly regarding the ability of district courts to issue universal injunctions against government actions deemed illegal.
Analysis
Kris Mayes' statement is a direct response to the Supreme Court's ruling and reflects her legal strategy moving forward. The confidence she expresses is based on her belief that the courts will ultimately uphold constitutional protections against what she describes as "illegal actions" by the Trump administration (Arizona Attorney General's Office, source-1).
The Supreme Court's decision, while allowing Trump's order to potentially take effect in certain states, does not eliminate the possibility of further legal challenges. The ruling has been criticized for limiting the power of lower courts to issue broad injunctions, which may complicate efforts to challenge executive actions effectively (New York Times, source-2). Critics argue that this could lead to a situation where unconstitutional policies are implemented while legal battles unfold, thus undermining the judicial system's role as a check on executive power.
Mayes' assertion that the order is unconstitutional is supported by previous court rulings, but the Supreme Court's recent decision indicates a shift in how such cases may be handled in the future. The reliability of her statement is bolstered by her position as Attorney General and her commitment to legal action, although it is important to note that the political context and potential biases inherent in her role may influence her statements.
Conclusion
The claim that "Mayes remains confident courts will rein in Trump's unconstitutional order" is True. Attorney General Kris Mayes explicitly stated her belief that the courts will ultimately address and potentially overturn Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship, despite the recent Supreme Court ruling that complicates such challenges. Her confidence stems from a legal perspective grounded in constitutional protections, even as the judicial landscape evolves.
