Fact Check: Mayes vows to fight against Trump's unconstitutional citizenship order.

Fact Check: Mayes vows to fight against Trump's unconstitutional citizenship order

What We Know

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes has publicly stated her intention to continue opposing former President Donald Trump's executive order regarding birthright citizenship. Following a recent Supreme Court decision, Mayes emphasized that the ruling does not invalidate her stance against Trump's order, which she claims violates the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (source-1). In a previous lawsuit filed in January 2025, Mayes argued that the executive order aimed to end birthright citizenship is unconstitutional and should be challenged in court (source-2).

The Supreme Court's recent ruling has been interpreted as limiting the power of judges in cases related to Trump's birthright citizenship order, suggesting that the order likely violates existing citizenship laws (source-3). Mayes' commitment to continue the legal battle indicates her belief that the fight against the order is far from over, despite the complexities introduced by the Supreme Court's decision (source-7).

Analysis

The claim that Mayes vows to fight against Trump's citizenship order is supported by her recent public statements and legal actions. The sources cited provide a clear timeline of her efforts, including the filing of a lawsuit and her responses to the Supreme Court's ruling. The reliability of these sources is strong, as they include official press releases from the Arizona Attorney General's office and reputable news outlets like Reuters and AZ Central, which are known for their journalistic standards.

However, the context surrounding the Supreme Court's decision is complex. While the ruling may limit judicial power in this area, it does not necessarily preclude further legal challenges. Mayes' determination to continue the fight suggests a strategic approach to potentially overturn or mitigate the effects of the executive order, which she and others argue undermines constitutional protections.

Despite the strong basis for Mayes' claims, the ongoing legal landscape regarding birthright citizenship remains contentious and subject to change. This uncertainty means that while Mayes is actively pursuing this issue, the outcome of her efforts and the broader implications of the Supreme Court's ruling are still in flux.

Conclusion

Needs Research. While there is substantial evidence supporting the claim that Attorney General Kris Mayes is committed to fighting against Trump's citizenship order, the legal landscape is complicated. The Supreme Court's recent ruling introduces new dynamics that may affect the viability of her legal challenges. Therefore, further research is needed to fully understand the implications of the ongoing legal battles and the potential outcomes of Mayes' efforts.

Fact Check: Mayes vows to fight against Trump's unconstitutional citizenship order.