Fact Check: Mayes vows to continue fighting against Trump's unconstitutional order
What We Know
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes has publicly stated her intention to continue challenging President Donald Trump's executive orders, which she describes as unconstitutional. In a recent statement, Mayes emphasized that "states — not the federal government — run elections," asserting that Trump's actions represent an "unconstitutional overreach" (source). This sentiment was echoed in her involvement in a coalition of 19 attorneys general who filed a lawsuit against Trump's order, which aimed to federalize election administration (source). Furthermore, after a Supreme Court ruling that limited the use of nationwide injunctions, Mayes reaffirmed her commitment to fight against Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship, labeling it as "blatantly unconstitutional" (source, source).
Analysis
The claim regarding Mayes' vow to continue fighting against Trump's orders is supported by multiple statements and actions taken by her office. The credibility of the sources is strong, as they include official press releases from the Arizona Attorney General's office and reputable news outlets. For instance, the press release detailing the coalition's lawsuit against Trump's election order provides direct quotes from Mayes, reinforcing her position (source).
However, while the statements from Mayes and the context of her legal actions are clear, the term "unconstitutional" is inherently subjective and can vary based on legal interpretation. The ongoing legal battles surrounding Trump's orders indicate that the outcomes are still pending and subject to judicial review. Therefore, while Mayes' commitment to challenge these orders is evident, the ultimate determination of constitutionality will depend on future court rulings.
Conclusion
Needs Research. While there is substantial evidence supporting the claim that Attorney General Mayes intends to continue her legal fight against Trump's executive orders, the complexities of constitutional law and the pending nature of these cases necessitate further investigation. The legal landscape is dynamic, and outcomes may shift as new rulings emerge.
Sources
- Attorney General Mayes Secures Decision Blocking President Trump's ...
- Credit card travel insurance: When it will and won't help - The Points Guy
- Is credit card travel insurance worth it? - CHOICE
- What's next for birthright citizenship after Supreme Court ruling
- Paying for a holiday on credit card – Are you protected?
- The 19 lawsuits Arizona Attorney General Mayes has filed against Trump ...
- How Section 75 protects your credit card purchases
- Supreme Court lets Trump birthright citizenship rewrite proceed as it ...
