Fact Check: Mayes believes Trump's order is blatantly unconstitutional.

Fact Check: Mayes believes Trump's order is blatantly unconstitutional

What We Know

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes has publicly expressed her belief that certain executive orders issued by former President Donald Trump are "blatantly unconstitutional." In a recent statement, she emphasized that she remains confident that these orders will be challenged and ultimately overturned by the courts (Attorney General Mayes Emphasizes Fight Continues). Specifically, she referred to Trump's executive order that aimed to federalize the administration of elections, asserting that it represented an unconstitutional overreach that undermined states' rights (Attorney General Mayes Secures Decision Blocking).

Mayes's assertions come in the context of multiple legal challenges against Trump's executive orders, with several federal judges ruling against these orders on constitutional grounds. For instance, a federal judge recently blocked an executive order targeting the law firm Susman Godfrey, declaring it unconstitutional and citing violations of First and Fifth Amendment rights (A fourth judge has blocked a Trump executive order).

Analysis

Kris Mayes's claim regarding the unconstitutionality of Trump's orders is grounded in a broader legal context where multiple judges have consistently ruled against similar executive actions by Trump. The rulings have highlighted significant constitutional violations, particularly concerning the independence of the judiciary and the rights of legal representation (A fourth judge has blocked a Trump executive order).

The credibility of Mayes's statements is bolstered by the fact that they align with the opinions of judges appointed by both Republican and Democratic administrations, indicating a bipartisan consensus on the matter. For example, Judge Beryll Howell, appointed by President Obama, noted the unprecedented nature of Trump's orders targeting law firms, reinforcing Mayes's assertion that these actions are not only controversial but also legally questionable (A fourth judge has blocked a Trump executive order).

However, it is important to consider the potential bias in Mayes's position as a Democratic Attorney General, which could influence her interpretation of Trump's actions. While her statements are supported by judicial rulings, they also reflect her political stance against the former president.

Conclusion

The claim that Mayes believes Trump's order is "blatantly unconstitutional" is Partially True. While Mayes has indeed made statements to this effect, and her views are supported by judicial rulings that have found Trump's executive orders unconstitutional, it is essential to recognize that her position is also influenced by her role as a Democratic official. Thus, while her belief is grounded in legal precedent, it is also shaped by the political context in which she operates.

Fact Check: Mayes believes Trump's order is blatantly unconstitutional.