TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Is FHSAs tax deductible?

Fact Check: Is FHSAs tax deductible?

Published May 25, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
?
VERDICT
Unverified

# Is FHSAs Tax Deductible? The claim regarding the tax deductibility of First Home Savings Accounts (FHSAs) has gained attention as individuals seek ...

Is FHSAs Tax Deductible?

The claim regarding the tax deductibility of First Home Savings Accounts (FHSAs) has gained attention as individuals seek to understand how these accounts function within the broader context of tax benefits for savings. FHSAs are a relatively new financial tool designed to help individuals save for their first home, but questions remain about their tax implications, specifically whether contributions to these accounts are tax-deductible.

What We Know

  1. Definition of FHSAs: First Home Savings Accounts (FHSAs) are designed to assist first-time homebuyers in saving for their initial home purchase. They allow individuals to save money tax-free, similar to Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) and Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs) 1.

  2. Tax Benefits: According to IRS guidelines, contributions to certain tax-advantaged accounts can be deducted from taxable income, potentially lowering an individual's overall tax burden. However, the specific tax treatment of FHSAs is still evolving, and detailed IRS guidance is limited 15.

  3. Comparison with Other Accounts: Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) and Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs) offer tax deductions for contributions, which can be used for qualified medical expenses. FHSAs, while similar in concept, are specifically tailored for home purchases and may have different rules regarding contributions and withdrawals 246.

  4. Contribution Limits: As of 2023, the IRS has set various contribution limits for tax-advantaged accounts, but specific limits for FHSAs are not as clearly defined in the available literature 39. This lack of clarity can lead to confusion regarding their tax treatment.

  5. Withdrawal Conditions: Withdrawals from FHSAs for qualified home purchases are typically tax-free, which is a significant benefit for savers. However, the rules governing what constitutes a "qualified" withdrawal may vary and require further clarification from the IRS 18.

Analysis

The claim about the tax deductibility of FHSAs requires careful examination of available sources and their reliability:

  • IRS Publications: The IRS is the primary authority on tax matters in the United States, and their publications are generally considered reliable. However, the specific guidance on FHSAs is still developing, which may lead to inconsistencies in understanding their tax treatment 1.

  • Financial Advisory Sources: Articles from financial advisory firms (e.g., PSA CPA, Stratus) provide insights into the tax implications of various savings accounts, including HSAs and FSAs. While these sources can offer valuable information, they may also reflect the biases of their authors or firms, particularly if they have a vested interest in promoting certain financial products 56.

  • Conflicting Information: Some sources provide conflicting information regarding the tax treatment of FHSAs. For instance, while some suggest that contributions may not be tax-deductible, others imply that they could be treated similarly to HSAs under certain conditions. This discrepancy highlights the need for further clarification from authoritative sources 210.

  • Methodological Concerns: The lack of comprehensive studies or analyses specifically focusing on FHSAs limits the understanding of their tax implications. Most available information is derived from general tax guidelines applicable to similar accounts, which may not fully capture the nuances of FHSAs 34.

Conclusion

Verdict: Unverified

The claim regarding the tax deductibility of First Home Savings Accounts (FHSAs) remains unverified due to insufficient and conflicting evidence. While FHSAs are designed to provide tax-free savings for first-time homebuyers, the specific tax treatment of contributions is not clearly defined in current IRS guidelines. The evolving nature of these accounts, coupled with limited authoritative guidance, contributes to the uncertainty surrounding their tax implications.

It is important to note that while some sources suggest potential tax benefits akin to those of Health Savings Accounts (HSAs), others indicate that contributions may not be deductible. This inconsistency underscores the necessity for further clarification from the IRS and other reliable financial authorities.

Readers should be aware of the limitations in the available evidence and the potential for evolving regulations. As such, it is advisable to critically evaluate information regarding FHSAs and consult with tax professionals for personalized advice.

Sources

  1. IRS Publication 969 (2024), Health Savings Accounts and Other Tax-Favored Accounts. Retrieved from IRS
  2. IRS Releases 2023 Cost-of-Living Adjustments for Health FSAs. Retrieved from Thomson Reuters
  3. PDF FHSA Contributions, Transfers and Activities - EY. Retrieved from EY
  4. FSA-HSA Contribution Limits for 2023 - Stratus. Retrieved from Stratus
  5. HSA Taxes, FSA Taxes & How They Work in 2023-2024 - PSA CPA. Retrieved from PSA CPA
  6. 2022 FSAs, HSAs, and HRAs | Luminare Health. Retrieved from Luminare Health
  7. 2023 health FSA, other health and fringe benefit limits now set - Mercer. Retrieved from Mercer
  8. FSA and HSA: What's New for 2023? - RxLess. Retrieved from RxLess
  9. IRS Releases 2023 Inflation Adjustments for FSAs, HDHPs, and Other Arrangements - SBAM. Retrieved from SBAM
  10. 2023 IRS Limits for HSA, FSA, 401k, HDHP, and More [Comprehensive Guide] - Griffin Benefits. Retrieved from Griffin Benefits

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Is FHSAs tax free?
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is FHSAs tax free?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is FHSAs tax free?

May 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 125 Americans are shot and killed every day, and 200 MORE are injured — and Republicans just eliminated the tax on gun silencers as part of their “Big (Not-So) Beautiful Bill (Now Law).” Republicans added a provision in the final hours eliminates a nearly-century-old tax — which is currently $200 — for purchasing or making silencers, short-barreled rifles and shotguns, and other weapons.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: 125 Americans are shot and killed every day, and 200 MORE are injured — and Republicans just eliminated the tax on gun silencers as part of their “Big (Not-So) Beautiful Bill (Now Law).” Republicans added a provision in the final hours eliminates a nearly-century-old tax — which is currently $200 — for purchasing or making silencers, short-barreled rifles and shotguns, and other weapons.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 125 Americans are shot and killed every day, and 200 MORE are injured — and Republicans just eliminated the tax on gun silencers as part of their “Big (Not-So) Beautiful Bill (Now Law).” Republicans added a provision in the final hours eliminates a nearly-century-old tax — which is currently $200 — for purchasing or making silencers, short-barreled rifles and shotguns, and other weapons.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 2025 IRS Tax Forgiveness Programs Now available
False

Fact Check: 2025 IRS Tax Forgiveness Programs Now available

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 2025 IRS Tax Forgiveness Programs Now available

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: House Republicans "shut down [the] whole place to avoid releasing the files" and that they "stayed up all night a few weeks ago to steal your healthcare and give billionaires tax breaks."
Partially True

Fact Check: House Republicans "shut down [the] whole place to avoid releasing the files" and that they "stayed up all night a few weeks ago to steal your healthcare and give billionaires tax breaks."

Detailed fact-check analysis of: House Republicans "shut down [the] whole place to avoid releasing the files" and that they "stayed up all night a few weeks ago to steal your healthcare and give billionaires tax breaks."

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks