Fact Check:  House Republicans "shut down [the] whole place to avoid releasing the files" and that they "stayed up all night a few weeks ago to steal your healthcare and give billionaires tax breaks."

Fact Check: House Republicans "shut down [the] whole place to avoid releasing the files" and that they "stayed up all night a few weeks ago to steal your healthcare and give billionaires tax breaks."

Published July 27, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "House Republicans 'shut down [the] whole place to avoid releasing the files' and that they 'stayed up all night a few weeks ago to stea...

Fact Check: "House Republicans 'shut down [the] whole place to avoid releasing the files' and that they 'stayed up all night a few weeks ago to steal your healthcare and give billionaires tax breaks.'"

What We Know

The claim involves two main assertions: that House Republicans shut down the House to avoid a vote on releasing files related to Jeffrey Epstein, and that they are enacting policies that would harm healthcare access while benefiting the wealthy.

  1. House Shutdown and Epstein Files: Reports indicate that House Republicans did indeed call an early recess, which some sources attribute to a desire to avoid a vote on releasing Epstein-related files. For instance, The Fiscal Times noted that Republicans were reluctant to take a "perilous vote" on this issue, suggesting a strategic decision to avoid potential political fallout. Similarly, The Guardian confirmed that the House called an early summer recess, which aligns with the timing of the discussions about the Epstein files.

  2. Healthcare Cuts and Tax Breaks: The Republican budget proposal has been criticized for making significant cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), while simultaneously providing substantial tax breaks to the wealthiest Americans. According to Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, the proposal would lead to the largest cuts to Medicaid in history, affecting millions of Americans. Additionally, the Penn Wharton Budget Model estimates that the wealthiest 0.1% would receive an average tax break of $389,280 under this plan. Rep. Scott Peters also echoed these concerns, stating that the Republican tax plan would cut healthcare for millions to fund tax cuts for the wealthy (source-2).

Analysis

The first part of the claim regarding the House shutdown appears to be substantiated by credible sources. The reports from both The Fiscal Times and The Guardian provide a clear context for the early recess, linking it to the contentious issue of the Epstein files. This suggests that the Republicans' decision was indeed politically motivated, although the term "shut down the whole place" may be somewhat hyperbolic, as it refers to a recess rather than a complete shutdown of government operations.

The second part of the claim regarding healthcare cuts and tax breaks is also supported by substantial evidence. The statements from Rep. Cleaver and Rep. Peters highlight the significant implications of the Republican budget proposal, which aims to cut essential services while benefiting the wealthy. The data from the Penn Wharton Budget Model and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) corroborate these assertions, indicating that millions could lose healthcare coverage as a result of these policies.

However, it is important to note that while the claims about healthcare cuts and tax breaks are largely accurate, the framing of "stealing your healthcare" could be seen as emotive language. It captures the sentiment of many critics but may not reflect the nuanced realities of legislative processes and budgetary decisions.

Conclusion

The claim is Partially True. The assertion that House Republicans shut down the House to avoid releasing files related to Jeffrey Epstein is supported by credible reports, indicating a politically motivated decision. Additionally, the claim that the Republican budget proposal would cut healthcare access while providing tax breaks to the wealthy is substantiated by multiple sources. However, the language used in the claim could be considered hyperbolic or emotive, which may detract from a purely factual representation of the events.

Sources

  1. Rep. Cleaver Votes Against GOP Budget That Rips ...
  2. Rep. Scott Peters Votes NO on Disastrous Republican Tax Plan
  3. Congressional Record
  4. House GOP Passes Largest Cuts to Medicaid, SNAP In ...
  5. Republicans Shut Down the House Early to Avoid Epstein Vote
  6. US House calls early summer recess to block voting on ...
  7. House Republicans Advance Massive Tax Cuts for the Rich
  8. Republicans ready for bruising battle ahead of government ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Redrawing Texas congressional maps could give Republicans five more House seats.
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Redrawing Texas congressional maps could give Republicans five more House seats.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Redrawing Texas congressional maps could give Republicans five more House seats.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  Reps Ro Khanna & Thomas Massie now have House votes needed to force floor vote on release of Epstein files
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Reps Ro Khanna & Thomas Massie now have House votes needed to force floor vote on release of Epstein files

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Reps Ro Khanna & Thomas Massie now have House votes needed to force floor vote on release of Epstein files

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: So if Biden’s administration destroyed the files, what the fuck was this
"The image shows conservative commentators, including Kash Patel (left, holding a binder), exiting the West Wing of the White House, carrying binders labeled "The Epstein Files: Phase 1".
Partially True

Fact Check: So if Biden’s administration destroyed the files, what the fuck was this "The image shows conservative commentators, including Kash Patel (left, holding a binder), exiting the West Wing of the White House, carrying binders labeled "The Epstein Files: Phase 1".

Detailed fact-check analysis of: So if Biden’s administration destroyed the files, what the fuck was this "The image shows conservative commentators, including Kash Patel (left, holding a binder), exiting the West Wing of the White House, carrying binders labeled "The Epstein Files: Phase 1".

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: House Republicans are protecting the rich and powerful by blocking Epstein file releases.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: House Republicans are protecting the rich and powerful by blocking Epstein file releases.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: SENATE APPROVES PUBLIC MEDIA CUTS Early this morning, the Senate narrowly approved devastating public media funding cuts. The Rescissions Act is now back with the House where a vote is expected within hours. Urge your Representative to vote NO. PROTECTMY PUBLIC MEDIA ®
True

Fact Check: SENATE APPROVES PUBLIC MEDIA CUTS Early this morning, the Senate narrowly approved devastating public media funding cuts. The Rescissions Act is now back with the House where a vote is expected within hours. Urge your Representative to vote NO. PROTECTMY PUBLIC MEDIA ®

Detailed fact-check analysis of: SENATE APPROVES PUBLIC MEDIA CUTS Early this morning, the Senate narrowly approved devastating public media funding cuts. The Rescissions Act is now back with the House where a vote is expected within hours. Urge your Representative to vote NO. PROTECTMY PUBLIC MEDIA ®

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: House Republicans "shut down [the] whole place to avoid releasing the files" and that they "stayed up all night a few weeks ago to steal your healthcare and give billionaires tax breaks." | TruthOrFake Blog