TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Is FHSAs tax free?

Fact Check: Is FHSAs tax free?

Published May 25, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Is the First Home Savings Account (FHSA) Tax-Free? The claim that the First Home Savings Account (FHSA) is tax-free has gained traction, particular...

Is the First Home Savings Account (FHSA) Tax-Free?

The claim that the First Home Savings Account (FHSA) is tax-free has gained traction, particularly among first-time homebuyers in Canada. This account is designed to help individuals save for their first home, offering various tax benefits. However, the specifics of these tax advantages require careful examination to understand the full context and implications.

What We Know

  1. Tax-Deductible Contributions: Contributions made to an FHSA are generally tax-deductible. For the year 2023, individuals can contribute up to $8,000, with a lifetime maximum contribution limit of $40,000. Any unused contribution room can be carried forward to future years 123.

  2. Tax-Free Withdrawals: Withdrawals from the FHSA for the purpose of purchasing a qualifying first home are tax-free, similar to the Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA) 2310. This means that individuals can withdraw funds without incurring taxes, provided the funds are used appropriately.

  3. Tax-Free Growth: The income and growth of investments held within the FHSA are not taxed, allowing for tax-free compounding growth 56. This feature is particularly beneficial for long-term savings, as it can lead to a more substantial amount available for home purchase.

  4. Regulatory Framework: The FHSA was introduced as part of the Canadian government's efforts to assist first-time homebuyers, with the program officially launching on April 1, 2023 710. The rules governing the FHSA are outlined by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) and are subject to change based on legislative updates.

Analysis

Source Reliability

  • Government Sources: The official Canada.ca website 1 provides a primary source of information regarding the FHSA, detailing its tax implications and operational guidelines. Government sources are generally considered reliable due to their authoritative nature and accountability.

  • Statistical Reports: Statistics Canada 2 offers data on contributions and tax implications, which adds credibility to the understanding of the FHSA's financial mechanics. However, while statistical data is reliable, it should be interpreted with caution, particularly regarding future projections.

  • Tax Law Guides: Articles from tax law firms, such as the one from Tax Law Canada 3, provide insights into the FHSA's structure and tax benefits. While these sources can be informative, they may also have a vested interest in promoting tax planning services, which could introduce bias.

  • Financial Institutions: Information from banks and credit unions 89 often aims to attract customers to their financial products. While they provide useful information, their promotional nature may lead to a presentation of the FHSA that emphasizes benefits without fully addressing potential limitations.

Conflicting Information

While the consensus among sources is that contributions to the FHSA are tax-deductible and withdrawals for home purchases are tax-free, the nuances of these claims can vary. For instance, some sources emphasize the potential for tax-free growth more than others, which could lead to misunderstandings about the account's overall tax implications.

Methodological Concerns

The methodology behind the claims regarding tax benefits often relies on the interpretation of tax laws and regulations, which can be complex and subject to change. For instance, the CRA's guidelines may evolve, and new tax policies could impact the FHSA's structure. Additionally, the effectiveness of the FHSA in helping individuals save for a home can depend on various economic factors, including housing market conditions and interest rates.

Conclusion

Verdict: True

The claim that the First Home Savings Account (FHSA) is tax-free is substantiated by multiple reliable sources. Contributions to the FHSA are tax-deductible, withdrawals for qualifying home purchases are tax-free, and the growth of investments within the account is also tax-free. These features collectively support the assertion that the FHSA offers significant tax advantages for first-time homebuyers.

However, it is important to note that while the current framework provides these benefits, the regulatory environment can change, and future tax policies may alter the specifics of the FHSA. Additionally, the effectiveness of the FHSA in facilitating home purchases is influenced by broader economic conditions, which can vary over time.

Readers should remain aware of these nuances and limitations in the available evidence. It is advisable to critically evaluate information regarding financial products and consult with financial professionals when making decisions related to home buying and savings strategies.

Sources

  1. Canada.ca. First Home Savings Account (FHSA). Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/tax/individuals/topics/first-home-savings-account.html
  2. Statistics Canada. The Daily — RRSP, TFSA and FHSA Contributions, 2023. Retrieved from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/250401/dq250401a-eng.htm
  3. Tax Law Canada. A Canadian Tax Law Guide for First Home Savings Account (FHSA). Retrieved from https://taxlawcanada.com/a-canadian-tax-lawyers-guide-for-first-home-savings-account-fhsa/
  4. EY. PDF FHSA Contributions, Transfers and Activities. Retrieved from https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-ca/insights/tax/taxmatters/documents/s000-s15-23e.pdf
  5. Integris. PDF Your Guide to Understanding the FHSA. Retrieved from https://www.integriscu.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/FHSA_Brochure_2023_Spreads_WEB.pdf
  6. Horizon CPAs. Tax-Free First Home Savings Account (FHSA). Retrieved from https://horizoncpa.ca/tax-free-first-home-savings-account-fhsa/
  7. Jamie Golombek. PDF Tax-free First Home Savings Accounts: An overview. Retrieved from https://www.jamiegolombek.com/pdf/fhsa-overview-en2.pdf
  8. Bow Valley Credit Union. FHSA. Retrieved from https://www.bowvalleycu.com/en/personal/investing-wealth/fhsa
  9. Daily Hive. Opened a FHSA? Here's what you should know when filing your taxes. Retrieved from https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/first-home-savings-account-fhsa-taxes
  10. CHU CPA Professional Corporation. 2023 Personal Tax Update. Retrieved from https://chucpa.com/2023-personal-tax-update

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: All overtime income is now tax free
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: All overtime income is now tax free

Detailed fact-check analysis of: All overtime income is now tax free

Jul 22, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is FHSAs tax deductible?
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is FHSAs tax deductible?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is FHSAs tax deductible?

May 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Lottery is a tax on the poor
True

Fact Check: Lottery is a tax on the poor

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Lottery is a tax on the poor

Jul 24, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Can no longer file taxes for free in the USA
False

Fact Check: Can no longer file taxes for free in the USA

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Can no longer file taxes for free in the USA

Aug 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 125 Americans are shot and killed every day, and 200 MORE are injured — and Republicans just eliminated the tax on gun silencers as part of their “Big (Not-So) Beautiful Bill (Now Law).” Republicans added a provision in the final hours eliminates a nearly-century-old tax — which is currently $200 — for purchasing or making silencers, short-barreled rifles and shotguns, and other weapons.
Partially True

Fact Check: 125 Americans are shot and killed every day, and 200 MORE are injured — and Republicans just eliminated the tax on gun silencers as part of their “Big (Not-So) Beautiful Bill (Now Law).” Republicans added a provision in the final hours eliminates a nearly-century-old tax — which is currently $200 — for purchasing or making silencers, short-barreled rifles and shotguns, and other weapons.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 125 Americans are shot and killed every day, and 200 MORE are injured — and Republicans just eliminated the tax on gun silencers as part of their “Big (Not-So) Beautiful Bill (Now Law).” Republicans added a provision in the final hours eliminates a nearly-century-old tax — which is currently $200 — for purchasing or making silencers, short-barreled rifles and shotguns, and other weapons.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Is FHSAs tax free? | TruthOrFake Blog