TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: EEOC dropped seven gender identity discrimination lawsuits under Lucas's leadership.

Fact Check: EEOC dropped seven gender identity discrimination lawsuits under Lucas's leadership.

Published June 18, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "EEOC dropped seven gender identity discrimination lawsuits under Lucas's leadership." ## What We Know The claim that the Equal Employm...

Fact Check: "EEOC dropped seven gender identity discrimination lawsuits under Lucas's leadership."

What We Know

The claim that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) dropped seven gender identity discrimination lawsuits under Acting Chair Andrea Lucas's leadership is currently under scrutiny. According to a report by the Associated Press, Lucas declined to comment specifically on the seven cases the agency is reportedly seeking to drop. However, it has been noted that the EEOC has classified all new gender identity-related discrimination cases as its lowest priority, as stated in another AP report.

Lucas's leadership has been characterized by a shift in focus towards issues related to biological sex and away from gender identity concerns, which aligns with directives from Executive Order 14168 issued during the Trump administration. This order emphasizes the enforcement of laws governing sex-based rights and the removal of policies that promote gender ideology.

Additionally, a letter from House Democrats highlighted that complaints related to both gender identity and sexual orientation discrimination were not being processed as of January 2025, which raises questions about the agency's current handling of such cases (House Democrats Letter).

Analysis

The evidence surrounding the claim is mixed and requires further investigation. The assertion that the EEOC dropped seven lawsuits is not directly confirmed by Lucas or the EEOC's official communications. The lack of specific comments on these cases from Lucas suggests a degree of ambiguity. The Associated Press article indicates that while there is a move to deprioritize gender identity cases, it does not explicitly state that the lawsuits have been dropped.

Moreover, the context provided by the Executive Order 14168 and the subsequent actions taken by Lucas suggest a broader agenda to reshape the EEOC's focus. This includes the removal of materials promoting gender ideology and a stated commitment to protecting women based on biological sex. However, the reliability of the sources varies; while government reports and established news outlets like the Associated Press provide credible information, the interpretation of Lucas's actions may be influenced by political biases, particularly given the contentious nature of gender identity issues in current political discourse.

The letter from House Democrats (source-2) adds another layer of complexity, indicating that there are ongoing concerns about the EEOC's handling of gender discrimination claims, but it does not confirm the specific claim about the lawsuits being dropped.

Conclusion

Needs Research: The claim that the EEOC dropped seven gender identity discrimination lawsuits under Lucas's leadership lacks definitive confirmation and is surrounded by ambiguity. While there are indications of a shift in the agency's priorities under Lucas, the specific details regarding the lawsuits remain unclear. Further investigation and clarification from the EEOC are necessary to ascertain the accuracy of this claim.

Sources

  1. Removing Gender Ideology and Restoring the EEOC’s Role of Protecting Women in the Workplace
  2. House Democrats Letter to EEOC Acting Chair Lucas re ...
  3. ACLU moves to take up gender identity lawsuit that EEOC ...
  4. EEOC instructs staff to sideline all new transgender ...
  5. Civil rights agency's acting chief to face questions on anti-DEI ...
  6. Acting head of civil rights agency defends decisions ...
  7. Acting head of civil rights agency defends decisions ...
  8. EEOC nominee would likely lead 'real retreat' from ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Shortly after her appointment in January 2025, Andrea Lucas instructed the EEOC to halt the processing of claims related to gender identity discrimination.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Shortly after her appointment in January 2025, Andrea Lucas instructed the EEOC to halt the processing of claims related to gender identity discrimination.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Shortly after her appointment in January 2025, Andrea Lucas instructed the EEOC to halt the processing of claims related to gender identity discrimination.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The EEOC moved to dismiss six cases previously pursued against employers accused of gender identity discrimination, including EEOC v Boxwood Hotels.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The EEOC moved to dismiss six cases previously pursued against employers accused of gender identity discrimination, including EEOC v Boxwood Hotels.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The EEOC moved to dismiss six cases previously pursued against employers accused of gender identity discrimination, including EEOC v Boxwood Hotels.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In April 2025, the EEOC instructed all employees to classify gender identity discrimination complaints as its lowest priority, effectively putting the processing of such complaints on indefinite hold.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: In April 2025, the EEOC instructed all employees to classify gender identity discrimination complaints as its lowest priority, effectively putting the processing of such complaints on indefinite hold.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In April 2025, the EEOC instructed all employees to classify gender identity discrimination complaints as its lowest priority, effectively putting the processing of such complaints on indefinite hold.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The EEOC removed the 'x' gender marker on intake forms and issued a memorandum informing fair employment practices agencies that they will not receive credit for intakes or resolutions related to gender identity.
False

Fact Check: The EEOC removed the 'x' gender marker on intake forms and issued a memorandum informing fair employment practices agencies that they will not receive credit for intakes or resolutions related to gender identity.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The EEOC removed the 'x' gender marker on intake forms and issued a memorandum informing fair employment practices agencies that they will not receive credit for intakes or resolutions related to gender identity.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Democrats, including Congressman Mark Takano, Robert C. 'Bobby' Scott, and Suzanne Bonamici, sent a letter to Andrea Lucas, the acting chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), demanding enforcement of civil rights protections for transgender and nonbinary workers in October 2024.
False

Fact Check: Democrats, including Congressman Mark Takano, Robert C. 'Bobby' Scott, and Suzanne Bonamici, sent a letter to Andrea Lucas, the acting chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), demanding enforcement of civil rights protections for transgender and nonbinary workers in October 2024.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Democrats, including Congressman Mark Takano, Robert C. 'Bobby' Scott, and Suzanne Bonamici, sent a letter to Andrea Lucas, the acting chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), demanding enforcement of civil rights protections for transgender and nonbinary workers in October 2024.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: EEOC dropped seven gender identity discrimination lawsuits under Lucas's leadership. | TruthOrFake Blog