Fact Check: In April 2025, the EEOC instructed all employees to classify gender identity discrimination complaints as its lowest priority, effectively putting the processing of such complaints on indefinite hold.

Fact Check: In April 2025, the EEOC instructed all employees to classify gender identity discrimination complaints as its lowest priority, effectively putting the processing of such complaints on indefinite hold.

June 14, 2025by TruthOrFake AI
VERDICT
False

# Fact Check: "In April 2025, the EEOC instructed all employees to classify gender identity discrimination complaints as its lowest priority, effectiv...

Fact Check: "In April 2025, the EEOC instructed all employees to classify gender identity discrimination complaints as its lowest priority, effectively putting the processing of such complaints on indefinite hold."

What We Know

In April 2025, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) did indeed announce a shift in its handling of gender identity discrimination complaints. According to a report by AP News, the agency classified all new gender identity-related discrimination cases as its lowest priority. This categorization is typically reserved for complaints deemed to have little merit. The EEOC's decision aligns with a broader directive from the Biden administration aimed at rolling back policies associated with gender identity protections established during previous administrations.

Further, a letter from House Democrats to the EEOC Acting Chair Andrea Lucas confirms that the agency is expected to process and prioritize gender identity discrimination complaints like all other unlawful discrimination claims, contradicting the claim that these complaints are being sidelined indefinitely (House Democrats Letter).

Analysis

The claim that the EEOC has put gender identity discrimination complaints on "indefinite hold" is misleading. While it is true that the EEOC has classified these complaints as a low priority, this does not equate to a complete halt in processing. The agency is still required to address all complaints, albeit with a different prioritization. The distinction is crucial; classifying complaints as low priority does not mean they are ignored or indefinitely postponed.

Moreover, the source of the claim appears to be politically motivated, as it stems from a narrative that seeks to frame the EEOC's actions as a direct attack on gender identity protections. The reliability of the sources varies; while AP News is generally regarded as a credible news outlet, the framing of the issue by partisan sources may introduce bias. The letter from House Democrats serves as a counterpoint, indicating that the EEOC's actions are not as extreme as the claim suggests (House Democrats Letter, AP News).

Additionally, the EEOC's official communications indicate that while there is a shift in focus, the agency has not ceased to uphold protections against discrimination based on gender identity. The enforcement guidance on harassment in the workplace remains in effect, which includes protections for gender identity under Title VII (Enforcement Guidance).

Conclusion

Verdict: False. The claim that the EEOC instructed all employees to classify gender identity discrimination complaints as its lowest priority, effectively putting the processing of such complaints on indefinite hold, is misleading. While the EEOC has indeed categorized these complaints as low priority, it does not mean they are ignored or indefinitely postponed. The agency is still obligated to process all complaints, and the framing of the issue lacks nuance and context.

Sources

  1. House Democrats Letter to EEOC Acting Chair Lucas re ...
  2. Removing Gender Ideology and Restoring the EEOC's Role of Protecting Women in the Workplace
  3. Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace
  4. EEOC instructs staff to sideline all new transgender ...
  5. EEOC update: Executive order regarding gender identity
  6. Protecting Transgender and Non-Binary Workers: EEOC ...
  7. Congress members demand that EEOC address gender ...
  8. Workplace Strategies Watercooler 2025: The EEOC's ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The Trump administration began talks with Iran on April 12, 2025, and the Israeli attack occurred exactly 61 days later.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The Trump administration began talks with Iran on April 12, 2025, and the Israeli attack occurred exactly 61 days later.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Trump administration began talks with Iran on April 12, 2025, and the Israeli attack occurred exactly 61 days later.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The CIA was briefed in April and May 2025 on Israeli plans to attack Iran's nuclear sites.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The CIA was briefed in April and May 2025 on Israeli plans to attack Iran's nuclear sites.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The CIA was briefed in April and May 2025 on Israeli plans to attack Iran's nuclear sites.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In April 2025, China announced new export controls on rare earth minerals that require businesses to apply for a license to export these materials.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: In April 2025, China announced new export controls on rare earth minerals that require businesses to apply for a license to export these materials.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In April 2025, China announced new export controls on rare earth minerals that require businesses to apply for a license to export these materials.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In April 2025, China announced new export controls on rare earth minerals, requiring businesses to apply for a license to export these materials.
Partially True

Fact Check: In April 2025, China announced new export controls on rare earth minerals, requiring businesses to apply for a license to export these materials.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In April 2025, China announced new export controls on rare earth minerals, requiring businesses to apply for a license to export these materials.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
🔍
True

Fact Check: The investigation for Operation Soteria Shield began in April 2025 and lasted for a month.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The investigation for Operation Soteria Shield began in April 2025 and lasted for a month.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The investigation for Operation Soteria Shield began in April 2025 and lasted for one month.
True

Fact Check: The investigation for Operation Soteria Shield began in April 2025 and lasted for one month.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The investigation for Operation Soteria Shield began in April 2025 and lasted for one month.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In April 2025, the EEOC instructed all employees to classify gender identity discrimination complaints as its lowest priority, effectively putting the processing of such complaints on indefinite hold. | TruthOrFake Blog