Fact Check: Candace Owens has denied the existence of Dinosaurs

Candace Owens and the Denial of Dinosaurs: A Fact-Check

Introduction

The claim that Candace Owens has denied the existence of dinosaurs has gained traction in various media outlets and social platforms. This assertion stems from her recent public statements where she appears to question the scientific consensus surrounding dinosaurs and their extinction. The context of her claims raises questions about her understanding of paleontology and the motivations behind her statements.

What We Know

1. Public Statements: Candace Owens has made several remarks that suggest skepticism about the existence of dinosaurs. For instance, a recent article on MSN reported that Owens referred to the scientific evidence supporting dinosaurs as "absurd" 1. This aligns with her broader critique of established scientific narratives, which she has expressed in various forums, including podcasts and social media.

2. Podcast Discussions: In a podcast episode, Owens discussed her views on dinosaurs alongside other controversial topics, including the moon landing. She framed her skepticism as part of a larger conspiracy narrative, suggesting that the existence of dinosaurs is a fabrication by those in power 38.

3. Social Media Activity: Owens has taken to platforms like X (formerly Twitter) to promote her views, indicating a rejection of the scientific consensus on evolution and the extinction of dinosaurs 5.

4. Media Coverage: Various media outlets have reported on her statements, often highlighting the disconnect between her views and established scientific understanding. For example, a piece on Boing Boing described her claims as shocking given the extensive fossil record and scientific research supporting the existence of dinosaurs 7.

Analysis

Source Evaluation

• Credibility of Sources: The sources cited range from mainstream news outlets to social media and video platforms. While mainstream outlets like MSN and Boing Boing provide some level of editorial oversight, YouTube videos and social media posts may lack rigorous fact-checking and can be influenced by personal bias or sensationalism.

• Bias and Reliability: Some sources, such as those that are critical of Owens, may exhibit bias against her views, potentially framing her statements in a more negative light. Conversely, sources that support her claims may downplay the scientific consensus, leading to a skewed representation of her arguments.

• Methodology and Evidence: Owens' arguments appear to lack empirical support, relying instead on anecdotal evidence and conspiracy theories. This raises questions about the validity of her claims, as they contradict well-established scientific principles supported by extensive research in paleontology.

Conflicts of Interest

Owens is a public figure with a defined political agenda, which may influence her statements on scientific topics. Her framing of science as a "pagan faith" 10 suggests a broader ideological stance that may not prioritize empirical evidence over personal belief systems. This context is crucial for understanding her motivations and the potential biases in her claims.

Additional Information Needed

To fully assess the validity of Owens' claims, further information would be helpful, including:

• Detailed transcripts or recordings of her statements for context.
• Responses from paleontologists or scientists addressing her claims directly.
• Analysis of public reception and discourse surrounding her statements to gauge their impact.

Conclusion

Verdict: True

The evidence indicates that Candace Owens has indeed expressed skepticism regarding the existence of dinosaurs, characterizing scientific evidence as "absurd" and framing her views within a broader conspiracy narrative. This conclusion is supported by multiple public statements, podcast discussions, and social media activity where she openly questions established scientific consensus.

However, it is important to note that while her claims are documented, they are not supported by empirical evidence and contradict well-established scientific principles in paleontology. The sources used to evaluate her statements vary in credibility, with some exhibiting potential bias.

Additionally, the context of Owens' political agenda may influence her views, which complicates the interpretation of her statements. As such, while the claim that she denies the existence of dinosaurs is substantiated, it is essential to approach her assertions with a critical eye and recognize the limitations of the evidence available.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information themselves, considering the sources and context of claims made by public figures.

Sources

1. Candace Owens pivots to paleontology, calls dinosaurs "absurd" - MSN. Link
2. Candace Owens Thinks Dinosaurs Are What? - YouTube. Link
3. Candace Owens Doesn’t Believe In Dinosaurs. - YouTube. Link
4. Candace Owens Says Dinosaurs Never Existed - YouTube. Link
5. Candace Owens - X. Link
6. Candace Owens vs. Dinosaurs: A Thorough Takedown - YouTube. Link
7. Candace Owens pivots to paleontology, calls dinosaurs "absurd" - Boing Boing. Link
8. Candace Owens' Controversial Views on Dinosaurs and the Moon Landing. Link
9. Candace Owens is a cautionary tale about platforming ignorance. Link
10. Candace Owens describes science as "pagan faith" - Newsweek. Link