Fact Check: Candace Owens adheres pseudoscientific beliefs

Fact Check: "Candace Owens adheres to pseudoscientific beliefs"

What We Know

Candace Owens, a prominent political commentator and author, has made several statements that suggest a departure from established scientific consensus. In a recent episode of her podcast, she described science as a "pagan faith" and expressed skepticism towards widely accepted scientific principles, including the shape of the Earth, stating that she had been reading literature supporting the flat Earth theory (Newsweek). This aligns with her broader pattern of questioning scientific authority, particularly regarding COVID-19 vaccinations and public health measures, which she has criticized as lacking common sense (Wikipedia).

Owens has also been associated with various conspiracy theories. For instance, she has publicly expressed doubts about the existence of systemic racism and the severity of white supremacy in society, which are often counter to findings from social science research (Wikipedia). Her skepticism extends to the scientific community, where she has claimed that reliance on expert opinion constitutes a form of faith rather than empirical reasoning (Newsweek).

Analysis

The claim that Candace Owens adheres to pseudoscientific beliefs is supported by her own statements and the context in which they are made. Her characterization of science as a "pagan faith" indicates a rejection of scientific methodology and an embrace of alternative narratives that lack empirical support. This is further evidenced by her engagement with flat Earth theories, which are widely discredited by the scientific community (Newsweek).

Moreover, Owens's history of promoting conspiracy theories and her dismissal of established scientific consensus raises questions about her credibility as a commentator on scientific matters. For example, her statements regarding COVID-19 measures reflect a broader trend of anti-scientific sentiment that has been critiqued by various commentators (LinkedIn).

While some may argue that her views are simply a reflection of personal belief or skepticism towards authority, the consistent pattern of rejecting scientifically validated information in favor of conspiratorial thinking suggests a deeper adherence to pseudoscientific beliefs. This pattern is corroborated by multiple sources that document her controversial statements and positions (Wikipedia, Newsweek, AEI).

Conclusion

The verdict is True. Candace Owens's statements and actions demonstrate a clear alignment with pseudoscientific beliefs. Her rejection of established scientific principles, promotion of conspiracy theories, and characterization of science as a faith indicate a significant departure from empirical reasoning and scientific consensus.