TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Bear lid removal took just minutes after two years of suffering!

Fact Check: Bear lid removal took just minutes after two years of suffering!

Published June 19, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Bear lid removal took just minutes after two years of suffering!" ## What We Know A black bear in Michigan had a plastic lid stuck aro...

Fact Check: "Bear lid removal took just minutes after two years of suffering!"

What We Know

A black bear in Michigan had a plastic lid stuck around its neck for approximately two years. The bear was first spotted in 2023 as a cub, and it was frequently observed on trail cameras while wearing the lid. Wildlife experts from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) were alerted to the bear's presence and successfully trapped it on June 2, 2025. The lid was removed shortly thereafter, taking only a few minutes to cut off once the bear was immobilized with an injection (AP News, ClickOnDetroit).

The bear was found to have some scarring and an abscess on its neck but was otherwise in surprisingly good health, weighing around 110 pounds, which is typical for a two-year-old bear (ClickOnDetroit, NBC News). The DNR noted that the bear managed to survive and feed itself despite the discomfort caused by the lid (AP News).

Analysis

The claim that the removal of the lid took just minutes is supported by multiple credible sources. The Michigan DNR staff confirmed that after the bear was safely trapped and immobilized, the actual cutting off of the lid was a quick process (ClickOnDetroit, MLive). Wildlife biologist Angela Kujawa, who was present during the procedure, corroborated this by stating that the lid was removed swiftly once they had the bear under anesthesia (AP News).

The sources used in this fact check are reputable and provide consistent information regarding the events. The AP News article is a well-established news outlet known for its accurate reporting, while ClickOnDetroit and MLive are local news platforms that cover Michigan news extensively and have reported on the bear's situation in detail. Both outlets have quoted DNR officials, adding credibility to the information presented (ClickOnDetroit, MLive).

Conclusion

The claim that the bear lid removal took just minutes after two years of suffering is True. The evidence from multiple reliable sources confirms that the lid was removed quickly once the bear was trapped and immobilized, and the bear was able to recover from its ordeal.

Sources

  1. A Michigan bear roamed the woods for two years with an awful lid on his neck. Not anymore.
  2. Michigan bear freed after plastic lid stuck on neck for 2 years, DNR says
  3. Michigan bear finally free of lid that was stuck on its neck for years
  4. Michigan DNR removes plastic lid stuck on bear's neck for two years

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Bear spotted in Vilnius after years of absence caused national uproar.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Bear spotted in Vilnius after years of absence caused national uproar.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Bear spotted in Vilnius after years of absence caused national uproar.

Jun 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Bear wandered into Vilnius for the first time in years, causing a national stir.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Bear wandered into Vilnius for the first time in years, causing a national stir.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Bear wandered into Vilnius for the first time in years, causing a national stir.

Jun 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Bear spotted peacefully wandering 60 kilometers from Vilnius after escaping the city.
True

Fact Check: Bear spotted peacefully wandering 60 kilometers from Vilnius after escaping the city.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Bear spotted peacefully wandering 60 kilometers from Vilnius after escaping the city.

Jun 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: American consumers will bear the brunt of tariffs imposed by Trump.
True

Fact Check: American consumers will bear the brunt of tariffs imposed by Trump.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: American consumers will bear the brunt of tariffs imposed by Trump.

Jul 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms in the United States.
True

Fact Check: The Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms in the United States.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms in the United States.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Bear lid removal took just minutes after two years of suffering! | TruthOrFake Blog