TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Bear wandered into Vilnius for the first time in years, causing a national stir.

Fact Check: Bear wandered into Vilnius for the first time in years, causing a national stir.

Published June 20, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Bear wandered into Vilnius for the first time in years, causing a national stir." ## What We Know A young female bear recently wandere...

Fact Check: "Bear wandered into Vilnius for the first time in years, causing a national stir."

What We Know

A young female bear recently wandered into the suburbs of Vilnius, Lithuania, creating significant public interest and concern. This event marked the first time in several years that a bear had entered the city. The bear roamed through neighborhoods, crossed highways, and was observed by numerous onlookers, including those using smartphones and drones to capture the moment (Washington Post, AP News). The Lithuanian government issued a permit for the bear to be shot, which sparked outrage among local hunters who were aware of the bear's protected status and the small population of bears in Lithuania, estimated to be between five and ten (Independent, AP News).

The bear was described as a scared but non-aggressive two-year-old female, and the Lithuanian Association of Hunters and Fishermen expressed their shock at the government's decision, advocating instead for a humane approach to capture and relocate the bear (Washington Post, AP News). After two days of being in the city, the bear managed to leave and was later spotted peacefully wandering in a forest about 60 kilometers from Vilnius (Washington Post, Independent).

Analysis

The claim that a bear wandered into Vilnius for the first time in years and caused a national stir is substantiated by multiple credible sources. Reports from reputable news outlets such as the Washington Post and AP News confirm the incident, detailing the bear's movements and the public's reaction. The involvement of local hunters and their refusal to comply with the government's order to kill the bear adds to the narrative's credibility, highlighting the bear's protected status and the ethical concerns surrounding its treatment.

The sources used are reliable, with the Washington Post and AP News being well-established news organizations known for their journalistic integrity. The information provided is consistent across these sources, reinforcing the accuracy of the claim. Additionally, the involvement of the Lithuanian Association of Hunters and Fishermen lends further weight to the story, as it reflects a local perspective on wildlife conservation and public sentiment regarding the bear's fate.

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim that a bear wandered into Vilnius for the first time in years, causing a national stir, is accurate. The event was widely reported, and the reactions from both the public and local authorities confirm the significance of the incident. The bear's appearance in the city and the subsequent discussions about its fate highlight the ongoing challenges of wildlife management in urban areas.

Sources

  1. A wild bear enters Lithuania's capital. Hunters refuse a ...
  2. A wild bear enters Lithuania's capital. Hunters refuse ...
  3. Lithuanian hunters refuse a government request to shoot a wild bear in ...
  4. LRT English Newsletter: Crazy over bears - LRT - Lietuvos Radijas ir ...
  5. Vilnius Mayor Finally Responds to Bear's Appearance in the Capital ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Bear spotted in Vilnius after years of absence caused national uproar.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Bear spotted in Vilnius after years of absence caused national uproar.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Bear spotted in Vilnius after years of absence caused national uproar.

Jun 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The bear wandered 60 kilometers from Vilnius, escaping the city.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The bear wandered 60 kilometers from Vilnius, escaping the city.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The bear wandered 60 kilometers from Vilnius, escaping the city.

Jun 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Bear spotted wandering Vilnius suburbs for two days before escaping to the forest.
True

Fact Check: Bear spotted wandering Vilnius suburbs for two days before escaping to the forest.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Bear spotted wandering Vilnius suburbs for two days before escaping to the forest.

Jun 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Bear spotted peacefully wandering 60 kilometers from Vilnius after escaping the city.
True

Fact Check: Bear spotted peacefully wandering 60 kilometers from Vilnius after escaping the city.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Bear spotted peacefully wandering 60 kilometers from Vilnius after escaping the city.

Jun 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Wildlife experts finally trap bear after two years of searching!
True

Fact Check: Wildlife experts finally trap bear after two years of searching!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Wildlife experts finally trap bear after two years of searching!

Jun 20, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Bear wandered into Vilnius for the first time in years, causing a national stir. | TruthOrFake Blog