TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Bear spotted in Vilnius after years of absence caused national uproar.

Fact Check: Bear spotted in Vilnius after years of absence caused national uproar.

Published June 21, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Bear spotted in Vilnius after years of absence caused national uproar." ## What We Know A young female bear was spotted roaming the su...

Fact Check: "Bear spotted in Vilnius after years of absence caused national uproar."

What We Know

A young female bear was spotted roaming the suburbs of Vilnius, Lithuania, causing significant public interest and concern. This event marked the first time in many years that a bear had entered the city, leading to widespread media coverage and public discussion (AP News). The bear was seen exploring neighborhoods, crossing highways, and being pursued by onlookers and drones. The Lithuanian government issued a permit for the bear to be shot, which was met with backlash from local hunters who refused to comply, citing the bear's status as a protected species and expressing concern for its well-being (ABC News).

The Lithuanian Association of Hunters and Fishermen noted that there are only about 5 to 10 bears in the entire country, making the sighting particularly significant. The bear was described as a "beautiful young female" who was scared but not aggressive, and the organization advocated for a more humane approach to handling the situation, such as sedation and relocation (LRT).

Analysis

The claim that the bear's appearance caused a national uproar is supported by multiple credible sources. The bear's sighting was indeed unprecedented in recent years, leading to significant media attention and public discourse. The issuance of a kill permit by the government, followed by the refusal of local hunters to carry it out, highlights the contentious nature of the situation and the public's emotional response to the bear's presence (AP News; ABC News).

The reliability of the sources is strong, as they include reputable news agencies like the Associated Press and ABC News, which are known for their journalistic standards. The information provided is consistent across different reports, reinforcing the claim's validity. Additionally, the involvement of local authorities and wildlife experts adds credibility to the narrative, as their responses reflect a genuine concern for both public safety and wildlife conservation.

Conclusion

The claim that a bear was spotted in Vilnius after years of absence and that it caused a national uproar is True. The significant public interest, governmental actions, and the refusal of local hunters to comply with a controversial kill permit all indicate that this event resonated deeply within the Lithuanian community.

Sources

  1. Lithuanian hunters refuse government request to shoot a wild bear in ...
  2. bear的过去式到底是born还是borne？ - 百度知道
  3. bear的过去式和过去分词 - 百度知道
  4. The saga continues: Vilnius bear spotted in the forests near Pabradė
  5. Lithuanian hunters refuse a government request to shoot a ...
  6. 动物英文单词100个 - 百度知道
  7. Vilnius Mayor Finally Responds to Bear's Appearance in the Capital ...
  8. 正负符号±怎么打出来 - 百度知道

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Bear wandered into Vilnius for the first time in years, causing a national stir.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Bear wandered into Vilnius for the first time in years, causing a national stir.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Bear wandered into Vilnius for the first time in years, causing a national stir.

Jun 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Bear spotted peacefully wandering 60 kilometers from Vilnius after escaping the city.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Bear spotted peacefully wandering 60 kilometers from Vilnius after escaping the city.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Bear spotted peacefully wandering 60 kilometers from Vilnius after escaping the city.

Jun 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Bear spotted wandering Vilnius suburbs for two days before escaping to the forest.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Bear spotted wandering Vilnius suburbs for two days before escaping to the forest.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Bear spotted wandering Vilnius suburbs for two days before escaping to the forest.

Jun 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Wildlife experts finally trap bear after two years of searching!
True

Fact Check: Wildlife experts finally trap bear after two years of searching!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Wildlife experts finally trap bear after two years of searching!

Jun 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The bear wandered 60 kilometers from Vilnius, escaping the city.
True

Fact Check: The bear wandered 60 kilometers from Vilnius, escaping the city.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The bear wandered 60 kilometers from Vilnius, escaping the city.

Jun 21, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks