TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Bear first spotted as a cub in 2023, evaded capture for two years.

Fact Check: Bear first spotted as a cub in 2023, evaded capture for two years.

Published June 19, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Bear first spotted as a cub in 2023, evaded capture for two years." ## What We Know A black bear in Michigan was first spotted on trai...

Fact Check: "Bear first spotted as a cub in 2023, evaded capture for two years."

What We Know

A black bear in Michigan was first spotted on trail cameras in 2023 while it was still a cub. The bear had its head stuck in a plastic lid, which it carried around for two years. According to reports, the bear was elusive during this time, frequently appearing in trail camera photos but disappearing before wildlife officials could intervene (New York Times, AP News). The bear was finally captured in June 2025, when it was approximately two years old, and the lid was removed (Detroit News, Global News).

Analysis

The claim that the bear was first spotted as a cub in 2023 and evaded capture for two years is supported by multiple reliable sources. The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) confirmed that they first became aware of the bear in 2023 through trail camera footage (AP News). The bear's ability to evade capture for two years is corroborated by wildlife experts who noted its elusive nature during this period (Detroit News).

The sources used in this fact-check are credible, including major news outlets and official statements from wildlife authorities. The New York Times, AP News, and Detroit News are reputable sources known for their journalistic integrity and fact-checking standards. The information provided aligns consistently across these sources, reinforcing the accuracy of the claim.

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim that the bear was first spotted as a cub in 2023 and evaded capture for two years is accurate. The evidence from multiple credible sources confirms both the timeline of the bear's sightings and its eventual capture after a prolonged period of evasion.

Sources

  1. Bear Whose Head Was Stuck for Two Years Is Freed - New York Times
  2. A Michigan bear roamed the woods for two years with an awful lid on his ... - AP News
  3. After 2 years with a lid stuck on its neck, a Michigan black bear is ... - Detroit News
  4. Black bear finally freed of lid that was stuck on its neck for 2 years ... - Global News

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Bear spotted in Vilnius after years of absence caused national uproar.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Bear spotted in Vilnius after years of absence caused national uproar.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Bear spotted in Vilnius after years of absence caused national uproar.

Jun 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Bear wandered into Vilnius for the first time in years, causing a national stir.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Bear wandered into Vilnius for the first time in years, causing a national stir.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Bear wandered into Vilnius for the first time in years, causing a national stir.

Jun 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Bear spotted wandering Vilnius suburbs for two days before escaping to the forest.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Bear spotted wandering Vilnius suburbs for two days before escaping to the forest.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Bear spotted wandering Vilnius suburbs for two days before escaping to the forest.

Jun 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Bear spotted peacefully wandering 60 kilometers from Vilnius after escaping the city.
True

Fact Check: Bear spotted peacefully wandering 60 kilometers from Vilnius after escaping the city.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Bear spotted peacefully wandering 60 kilometers from Vilnius after escaping the city.

Jun 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: American consumers will bear the brunt of tariffs imposed by Trump.
True

Fact Check: American consumers will bear the brunt of tariffs imposed by Trump.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: American consumers will bear the brunt of tariffs imposed by Trump.

Jul 10, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Bear first spotted as a cub in 2023, evaded capture for two years. | TruthOrFake Blog