TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Are Liverpool FC playing today?

Fact Check: Are Liverpool FC playing today?

Published May 6, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
?
VERDICT
Unverified

# Are Liverpool FC Playing Today? The claim in question is whether Liverpool FC is scheduled to play today. This inquiry is particularly relevant for...

Are Liverpool FC Playing Today?

The claim in question is whether Liverpool FC is scheduled to play today. This inquiry is particularly relevant for fans and followers of the club who want to keep track of their matches during the ongoing 2023–24 season.

What We Know

As of October 2023, Liverpool FC is in the midst of their 132nd season, competing in the Premier League and other competitions. According to the official Liverpool FC website, their match schedule includes various fixtures throughout the month of October 2023. Notably, Liverpool is set to play against Nottingham Forest on October 29, 2023, at Anfield 14.

Additionally, Liverpool's match against Everton is scheduled for October 21, 2023 56. Therefore, if today is either October 21 or October 29, Liverpool FC will indeed be playing.

Analysis

To determine whether Liverpool FC is playing today, we must first establish the current date. The sources provided detail the club's fixtures but do not specify today's date. The most reliable sources for fixture information include the official Liverpool FC website 4 and established sports news outlets like The New York Times 2.

  1. Source Reliability:

    • The official Liverpool FC website is a primary source for match schedules and is considered highly reliable due to its direct connection to the club.
    • The New York Times, while reputable, may not always have the most up-to-date information compared to the club's official channels.
    • Other sources like Transfermarkt 810 and This Is Anfield 7 also provide fixture lists, but their reliability can vary based on how frequently they are updated.

  2. Potential Bias:

    • While most of the sources are factual, the official club website may present information in a way that promotes fan engagement and loyalty, which could introduce a slight bias in how fixtures are framed.
    • The New York Times and similar outlets are generally neutral but may have a focus on broader narratives surrounding the club's performance rather than just fixture details.

  3. Methodology:

    • The information from these sources is typically compiled based on official league schedules and club announcements. However, discrepancies can arise if matches are rescheduled or if there are changes in broadcasting rights that affect kickoff times.

  4. Missing Information:

    • To definitively answer the claim, it would be helpful to know the current date. If today is not one of the scheduled match days, then Liverpool FC would not be playing.

Conclusion

Verdict: Unverified

The determination that Liverpool FC is playing today remains unverified due to the absence of a specified current date in the available information. While the official Liverpool FC website and other reputable sources confirm upcoming matches on October 21 and October 29, 2023, without knowing today's date, we cannot conclusively state whether the team is playing today.

This uncertainty highlights the importance of context in evaluating claims. The reliability of the sources is generally high, but the lack of a clear date introduces ambiguity. Furthermore, potential biases in how information is presented could affect perceptions of the match schedule.

It is crucial to acknowledge the limitations in the available evidence, as the current date is a key factor that remains unspecified. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information themselves and seek out the most current and direct sources to confirm match schedules.

Sources

  1. 2023–24 Liverpool F.C. season
  2. Liverpool's Premier League fixtures: Full 2023-24 schedule
  3. Liverpool FC — Fixtures
  4. Fixtures October 2023 - Liverpool Match
  5. Liverpool FC - Schedule 23/24 - Transfermarkt

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Are Liverpool FC on TV today?
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are Liverpool FC on TV today?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are Liverpool FC on TV today?

May 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is fc barcelona playing today?
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is fc barcelona playing today?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is fc barcelona playing today?

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is Queens Park Rangers playing today?
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is Queens Park Rangers playing today?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Queens Park Rangers playing today?

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is mbappe playing today?
False

Fact Check: Is mbappe playing today?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is mbappe playing today?

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is LFC playing today?
False

Fact Check: Is LFC playing today?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is LFC playing today?

Jun 12, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Are Liverpool FC playing today? | TruthOrFake Blog