TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Is mbappe playing today?

Fact Check: Is mbappe playing today?

Published July 1, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✗
VERDICT
False

# Is Mbappé Playing Today? The claim in question revolves around the participation of Kylian Mbappé in a match between Real Madrid and Juventus durin...

Is Mbappé Playing Today?

The claim in question revolves around the participation of Kylian Mbappé in a match between Real Madrid and Juventus during the 2025 FIFA Club World Cup. Reports indicate that while Mbappé is part of the squad, he is not starting the game but is available on the bench.

What We Know

  1. Current Status: According to a live update from The New York Times, Kylian Mbappé is included in the Real Madrid squad for their match against Juventus but is starting on the bench [1].

  2. Match Context: This match is part of the knockout stage of the FIFA Club World Cup, which is a significant tournament in international club football [4].

  3. Coaching Decisions: Reports from beIN Sports mention that there are questions surrounding why Mbappé is not starting, suggesting that his fitness or tactical decisions by coach Xabi Alonso may play a role [5].

  4. Debut Speculation: There has been considerable speculation about Mbappé's debut for Real Madrid, as he has been a focal point of discussion among fans and analysts alike [7].

Analysis

Source Evaluation

  • The New York Times: This source is generally regarded as credible and reliable, known for its thorough journalism. The live update format suggests timely information, but it is essential to consider that live updates may sometimes lack depth in context [1].

  • beIN Sports: This sports network is known for its coverage of soccer and provides insights into player conditions and match strategies. However, it is crucial to recognize that sports networks can sometimes have biases based on their affiliations with leagues or teams [5].

  • MSN: The article from MSN aggregates information from various sources, which can be beneficial for a broader perspective. However, the reliability of the information can vary depending on the original sources cited within the article [4].

  • StatMuse and ESPN: These platforms provide statistical data and match history, which can be useful for understanding a player's performance over time. However, they do not provide real-time updates on player status for specific matches [2][6].

Conflicting Information

While the reports confirm that Mbappé is part of the squad, they do not clarify the reasons behind his benching. This lack of detail raises questions about his fitness level and the tactical decisions made by the coaching staff. Additional information from team management or medical staff would be beneficial to understand the full context of his availability.

Methodological Concerns

The information regarding Mbappé's status primarily comes from live updates and sports commentary, which may not always provide comprehensive insights into player conditions. A more rigorous analysis involving official team announcements or player interviews would enhance the reliability of the claims.

Conclusion

Verdict: False

The claim that Kylian Mbappé is playing in the match against Juventus is false, as he is confirmed to be on the bench and not starting. Key evidence supporting this conclusion includes live updates from credible sources like The New York Times, which explicitly state his bench status [1]. Additionally, reports from beIN Sports raise questions about his fitness and the coaching decisions that led to this outcome [5].

However, it is important to note that while the information regarding his benching is clear, the reasons behind it remain somewhat ambiguous. The lack of detailed explanations from the coaching staff or medical team leaves room for speculation about his condition and readiness to play.

Moreover, the reliance on live updates and sports commentary introduces limitations in the depth of information available. Future updates or official statements from the team could provide further clarity on Mbappé's situation.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information from multiple sources and remain aware of the evolving nature of sports news, especially regarding player statuses.

Sources

  1. The New York Times. "Real Madrid vs Juventus live updates: Club World Cup ..." Link
  2. StatMuse. "Kylian Mbappé 2025 Matches." Link
  3. Google Translate Support. "Tłumaczenie tekstu pisanego - Komputer." Link
  4. MSN. "Kylian Mbappe Poised for Potential Debut in Real Madrid vs ..." Link
  5. beIN Sports. "Why Isn't Mbappé Starting Against Juventus in the Club ..." Link
  6. ESPN. "Kylian Mbappé 2024-25 Matches - Soccer." Link
  7. World Soccer Talk. "Will Kylian Mbappe debut in the FIFA Club World Cup 2025?" Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Is LFC playing today?
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is LFC playing today?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is LFC playing today?

Jun 12, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is fc barcelona playing today?
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is fc barcelona playing today?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is fc barcelona playing today?

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is Queens Park Rangers playing today?
Unverified

Fact Check: Is Queens Park Rangers playing today?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Queens Park Rangers playing today?

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is DK Metcalf playing today?
Unverified

Fact Check: Is DK Metcalf playing today?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is DK Metcalf playing today?

May 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is CJ Stroud playing today?
Unverified

Fact Check: Is CJ Stroud playing today?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is CJ Stroud playing today?

May 10, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks