TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Is LFC playing today?

Fact Check: Is LFC playing today?

Published June 12, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✗
VERDICT
False

# Is LFC Playing Today? The claim in question is whether Liverpool Football Club (LFC) is playing today. This inquiry is relevant for fans and follow...

Is LFC Playing Today?

The claim in question is whether Liverpool Football Club (LFC) is playing today. This inquiry is relevant for fans and followers of the team who wish to keep track of their matches. To address this claim, we will analyze the available information regarding Liverpool's current schedule.

What We Know

  1. Liverpool's Fixture List: According to the official Liverpool FC website, the team has a detailed fixture list that outlines all upcoming matches, including dates and times [3]. This source is directly from the club's official site, which is generally considered reliable for current schedules.

  2. Recent Matches: Liverpool has played several matches in October 2023, including a recent game against Everton on October 21, 2023, which they won 2-0 [4]. The club's performance in these matches can be tracked through various sports news outlets and official club communications.

  3. Upcoming Matches: The most recent fixture information indicates that Liverpool's next match is scheduled for October 29, 2023 [5]. This suggests that if today is before that date, then Liverpool is not playing today.

  4. External Sources: Other sports news websites, such as ESPN and The New York Times, also provide schedules for Liverpool's matches, confirming the dates and times of games [2][7]. These sources are generally reliable but can vary in their reporting based on the specific focus of their coverage.

Analysis

The reliability of the sources used to determine whether Liverpool is playing today varies:

  • Official Club Website: The Liverpool FC website [3] is the most authoritative source for fixture information. It is updated regularly and reflects the club's official schedule, making it a primary source for fans.

  • Wikipedia: The Wikipedia page for the 2023–24 Liverpool F.C. season [1] provides a general overview of the season's fixtures but may not always reflect the most current information due to its user-edited nature. While it can be a good starting point, it should not be solely relied upon for up-to-the-minute scheduling.

  • Sports News Outlets: Websites like ESPN and The New York Times [2][7] are reputable sources for sports news, but their schedules may not be as frequently updated as the official club site. They can serve as secondary sources to confirm fixture details.

  • Potential Conflicts of Interest: While the club's official website is reliable, it is also promotional in nature, focusing on positive aspects of the team's performance. External sources may have their own biases based on their audience or coverage focus, which can influence how they report on fixtures.

Methodological Considerations

To verify whether Liverpool is playing today, it would be beneficial to have:

  • Current Date: Knowing the exact date is crucial to determine if Liverpool has a match scheduled.
  • Real-Time Updates: Access to real-time sports news updates or live match trackers would provide the most accurate information regarding any last-minute changes to the schedule.

Conclusion

Verdict: False

The claim that Liverpool Football Club (LFC) is playing today is false. Evidence from the official Liverpool FC website confirms that their next match is scheduled for October 29, 2023, indicating that if today is before that date, Liverpool is not playing today.

While the sources consulted, including the club's official site and reputable sports news outlets, are generally reliable, there is always a possibility of last-minute changes or updates that could affect match schedules. Therefore, it is important for fans to verify the current date and check for real-time updates to ensure they have the most accurate information.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information from multiple sources and remain aware of the limitations inherent in scheduling data, particularly when relying on external platforms that may not be updated as frequently as official channels.

Sources

  1. 2023–24 Liverpool F.C. season. Wikipedia. Link
  2. Liverpool Schedule & Fixtures - 2024-25 EPL Matches. The New York Times. Link
  3. Men's Team Match Schedule. Liverpool FC. Link
  4. Liverpool FC Fixture event countdowns in October 2023. Link
  5. Liverpool FC - Schedule 23/24. Transfermarkt. Link
  6. Revealed: Liverpool's 2023-24 Premier League fixture list. Liverpool FC. Link
  7. Liverpool Fixtures. ESPN. Link
  8. Liverpool FC Fixtures & Results 2025/2026. Premier League. Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Is mbappe playing today?
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is mbappe playing today?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is mbappe playing today?

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is LFC on TV today?
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is LFC on TV today?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is LFC on TV today?

Jun 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is fc barcelona playing today?
Unverified

Fact Check: Is fc barcelona playing today?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is fc barcelona playing today?

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is Queens Park Rangers playing today?
Unverified

Fact Check: Is Queens Park Rangers playing today?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Queens Park Rangers playing today?

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is DK Metcalf playing today?
Unverified

Fact Check: Is DK Metcalf playing today?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is DK Metcalf playing today?

May 10, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks