TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: will A.I take over the world

Fact Check: will A.I take over the world

Published June 3, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
?
VERDICT
Unverified

# Will A.I. Take Over the World? ## Introduction The claim that "A.I. will take over the world" has sparked intense debate among technologists, ethic...

Will A.I. Take Over the World?

Introduction

The claim that "A.I. will take over the world" has sparked intense debate among technologists, ethicists, and the general public. This assertion encompasses a wide range of interpretations, from the fear of autonomous systems surpassing human intelligence to the more nuanced concerns about the societal impacts of advanced A.I. technologies. Various experts and organizations have made predictions regarding the future trajectory of A.I., with opinions ranging from optimistic to alarmist.

What We Know

  1. Expert Predictions: A survey conducted by Pew Research in April 2025 found that 56% of A.I. experts believe that A.I. will have a positive impact on the U.S. over the next 20 years, suggesting a more optimistic outlook on the integration of A.I. into society 8.

  2. Technological Advancements: Reports indicate that significant strides have been made in A.I. technology, particularly in the realm of generative A.I. tools, which have seen explosive growth in 2023 10. This growth is attributed to advancements in algorithms and increased computational power.

  3. Public Sentiment: A 2023 survey by DataRobot revealed that a majority of tech leaders support increased government regulation of A.I., indicating a recognition of the potential risks associated with unregulated A.I. development 3.

  4. Divergent Views on A.I.'s Future: The New York Times reported a stark divide in the A.I. prediction landscape, with some forecasts leaning towards a pessimistic view of A.I.'s future, suggesting potential societal disruptions 1. Conversely, other sources, such as Forbes, highlight the positive advancements in humanoid robotics and A.I. integration into various sectors 2.

  5. Narrow vs. General A.I.: Current A.I. systems are largely categorized as "narrow A.I.," meaning they are designed for specific tasks and lack general intelligence. Experts suggest that while advancements may occur, the emergence of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) that could "take over the world" remains speculative and is not expected in the near term 9.

Analysis

The claim that A.I. will take over the world is complex and multifaceted. The sources reviewed provide a mix of empirical data, expert opinions, and speculative forecasts.

  • Source Credibility: The Pew Research Center is generally considered a reliable source for public opinion data, while the New York Times is a reputable news organization known for its investigative journalism. However, both sources can exhibit bias based on their editorial slants. For instance, the New York Times' focus on the "gloom" aspect of A.I. may cater to a narrative that emphasizes risks over benefits.

  • Conflicting Perspectives: The divergence in expert opinions, as highlighted by the Pew Research survey and the reports from Forbes and the World Economic Forum, underscores the uncertainty surrounding A.I.'s future. While some experts advocate for regulation and caution, others emphasize the potential for innovation and positive societal impacts.

  • Methodological Concerns: Many predictions about A.I. rely on expert surveys and qualitative assessments, which can be subjective. The methodologies used to gauge expert opinions, such as the surveys conducted by Pew and DataRobot, should be scrutinized for sample size, representativeness, and question framing.

  • Need for Additional Information: To better understand the potential for A.I. to "take over the world," further research is needed on the implications of A.I. in various sectors, the ethical considerations of autonomous systems, and the long-term societal impacts of A.I. technologies.

Conclusion

Verdict: Unverified

The assertion that A.I. will take over the world remains unverified due to the complexity and variability of expert opinions and predictions. Key evidence includes the mixed sentiments from A.I. experts, with a significant portion expressing optimism about A.I.'s future impact, while others highlight potential risks and societal disruptions. The distinction between narrow A.I. and the speculative nature of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) further complicates the claim, as current technologies do not exhibit the capabilities associated with a "takeover."

It is important to note that the available evidence is limited and often subjective, relying heavily on expert surveys and qualitative assessments. The methodologies behind these predictions can vary, leading to potential biases and uncertainties. As such, the claim cannot be definitively categorized as true or false.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the information presented and consider the nuances involved in discussions about A.I.'s future. The landscape of A.I. is rapidly evolving, and ongoing research will be essential in clarifying its potential impacts on society.

Sources

  1. This A.I. Forecast Predicts Storms Ahead. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/03/technology/ai-futures-project-ai-2027.html
  2. How Accurate Were Our 2023 AI Predictions? Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/robtoews/2023/12/10/how-accurate-were-our-2023-ai-predictions/
  3. What are the key AI predictions for 2023 and beyond? World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/01/key-ai-predictions-for-2023-and-beyond/
  4. In 2023 AI Technology Will Become Indispensable And Trusted. Forrester. Retrieved from https://www.forrester.com/blogs/predictions-2023-ai/
  5. How Accurate Were Our 2023 AI Predictions? Radical Ventures. Retrieved from https://radical.vc/how-accurate-were-our-2023-ai-predictions/
  6. AI timelines: What do experts in artificial intelligence think? Our World in Data. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/ai-timelines
  7. 2023 Predictions: AI That Bends Reality, Unwinds the Golden Screw and Self-Replicates. NVIDIA Blog. Retrieved from https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2023-ai-predictions/
  8. Public and expert predictions for AI's next 20 years. Pew Research. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2025/04/03/public-and-expert-predictions-for-ais-next-20-years/
  9. When Will AI Take Over the World? We Asked ChatGPT. Newsweek. Retrieved from https://www.newsweek.com/will-ai-take-over-world-we-asked-chatgpt-1966935
  10. The state of AI in 2023: Generative AI's breakout year. McKinsey. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai-in-2023-generative-ais-breakout-year

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Reality is a flux of endlessly changing phenomena. Concepts freeze this flux and present it as something fixed and stable. This distortion is a lie: we treat unequal things as if they were equal, thereby misrepresenting them. Nearly every word is a concept, and every concept is a simplification of a unique, unrepeatable experience. When we name something, we group many different and unequal experiences under a single term. This act of generalization ignores the actual differences between individual things and moments. Humans invent words generally based on their sensory experience. Those words become concepts, not exact representations. Over time, we forget the metaphorical origin and treat the word as “truth.” Words aren’t truths—just metaphors that have been socially stabilized. Words do not describe the world—they construct a simplified fiction of it, which we often mistakenly call “reality.”
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Reality is a flux of endlessly changing phenomena. Concepts freeze this flux and present it as something fixed and stable. This distortion is a lie: we treat unequal things as if they were equal, thereby misrepresenting them. Nearly every word is a concept, and every concept is a simplification of a unique, unrepeatable experience. When we name something, we group many different and unequal experiences under a single term. This act of generalization ignores the actual differences between individual things and moments. Humans invent words generally based on their sensory experience. Those words become concepts, not exact representations. Over time, we forget the metaphorical origin and treat the word as “truth.” Words aren’t truths—just metaphors that have been socially stabilized. Words do not describe the world—they construct a simplified fiction of it, which we often mistakenly call “reality.”

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Reality is a flux of endlessly changing phenomena. Concepts freeze this flux and present it as something fixed and stable. This distortion is a lie: we treat unequal things as if they were equal, thereby misrepresenting them. Nearly every word is a concept, and every concept is a simplification of a unique, unrepeatable experience. When we name something, we group many different and unequal experiences under a single term. This act of generalization ignores the actual differences between individual things and moments. Humans invent words generally based on their sensory experience. Those words become concepts, not exact representations. Over time, we forget the metaphorical origin and treat the word as “truth.” Words aren’t truths—just metaphors that have been socially stabilized. Words do not describe the world—they construct a simplified fiction of it, which we often mistakenly call “reality.”

Aug 5, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: the U.S. and Israel helped a group take over Syria,
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: the U.S. and Israel helped a group take over Syria,

Detailed fact-check analysis of: the U.S. and Israel helped a group take over Syria,

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is trump attempting to take over the country in a self coup
True

Fact Check: Is trump attempting to take over the country in a self coup

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is trump attempting to take over the country in a self coup

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Nature doesn’t ask. It takes #viralreels #tsunami #foryou #water #nature #texas #world #2025 #mustsee #ai 00:00 / 00:06 Video Thumbnails All detected text: 07/14/2025 Thousands screamed. No one heard heardthem them
Unverified

Fact Check: Nature doesn’t ask. It takes #viralreels #tsunami #foryou #water #nature #texas #world #2025 #mustsee #ai 00:00 / 00:06 Video Thumbnails All detected text: 07/14/2025 Thousands screamed. No one heard heardthem them

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Nature doesn’t ask. It takes #viralreels #tsunami #foryou #water #nature #texas #world #2025 #mustsee #ai 00:00 / 00:06 Video Thumbnails All detected text: 07/14/2025 Thousands screamed. No one heard heardthem them

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: She was in this country illegally for years, butt then decided to finally take action after January 20, 2025.
Unverified

Fact Check: She was in this country illegally for years, butt then decided to finally take action after January 20, 2025.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: She was in this country illegally for years, butt then decided to finally take action after January 20, 2025.

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks