TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: She was in this country illegally for years, butt then decided to finally take action after January 20, 2025.

Fact Check: She was in this country illegally for years, butt then decided to finally take action after January 20, 2025.

Published July 28, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
?
VERDICT
Unverified

# Fact-Check Article: Claim Regarding Illegal Immigration Action ## What We Know The claim states that "She was in this country illegally for years,...

Advertisement
NordVPN - Explore the internet securely and privately

Secure your internet browsing withNordVPN's trusted protection

Fact-Check Article: Claim Regarding Illegal Immigration Action

What We Know

The claim states that "She was in this country illegally for years, but then decided to finally take action after January 20, 2025." To evaluate this, we need to consider the context of immigration policy changes and executive actions that were initiated around that date.

On January 20, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order titled Protecting the American People Against Invasion. This order aimed to enforce stricter immigration laws and revoke previous executive orders that had relaxed immigration enforcement. The order emphasized the need to prioritize the removal of individuals deemed inadmissible or removable, particularly those posing threats to national security or public safety. It also directed the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to enhance enforcement actions against undocumented immigrants in the U.S. (Federal Register).

Furthermore, the executive order outlined a comprehensive approach to immigration enforcement, including the establishment of Homeland Security Task Forces and prioritizing the prosecution of immigration-related offenses (National Law Review). This indicates a significant shift in policy aimed at increasing the enforcement of immigration laws.

Analysis

The claim implies that the individual in question was previously undocumented and only took action after the new executive order was signed. However, the details surrounding the individual's situation are not provided, making it difficult to verify the claim. The executive order itself does not specify any particular cases or individuals; it outlines a broad policy change affecting many undocumented immigrants.

The sources cited, particularly the executive order and its subsequent interpretations, indicate a clear intention by the Trump administration to ramp up immigration enforcement. This includes targeting individuals who have been in the country illegally for extended periods. However, the claim lacks specific evidence regarding the individual's actions or circumstances that led to their decision to "finally take action."

Moreover, the reliability of the sources is generally high, as they come from official government documents and reputable legal analyses. However, the interpretation of these policies can vary, and the potential for bias exists, especially in politically charged contexts.

Conclusion

Verdict: Unverified

The claim that "She was in this country illegally for years, but then decided to finally take action after January 20, 2025" remains unverified due to the lack of specific evidence regarding the individual's circumstances and actions. While the executive order signed on January 20, 2025, indicates a significant shift in immigration policy, it does not provide concrete details about any individual cases. Therefore, without additional information, the claim cannot be substantiated.

Sources

  1. Protecting the American People Against Invasion
  2. Federal Register :: Protecting the American People Against Invasion
  3. Key Impacts of 2025 Immigration Policies Under Executive Orders
  4. EO 14165 § 5 directs DHS to end “catch and release” and ...
  5. 2025 Immigration Rules Redefine Deportation Risks for Green Card Holders
  6. Legislative Bulletin — Friday, January 31, 2025 - National Immigration Forum
  7. Trump White House plans 10 actions on immigration, including ...
Advertisement
NordVPN - Explore the internet securely and privately

Secure your internet browsing withNordVPN's trusted protection

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: KATIE JOHNSON: "Mr. Trump had another girl and I dress as maids and pretend to clean the room. The other girl, Maria, was 12 years old. Mr. Trump ordered us to carry out a string of sex acts on each other and on him. After he finished he said "we both could have done better" and then left." (from her sworn affidavit about the 3rd encounter where Trump raped her when she was 13 years old. Her words have never been retracted or debunked. C
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: KATIE JOHNSON: "Mr. Trump had another girl and I dress as maids and pretend to clean the room. The other girl, Maria, was 12 years old. Mr. Trump ordered us to carry out a string of sex acts on each other and on him. After he finished he said "we both could have done better" and then left." (from her sworn affidavit about the 3rd encounter where Trump raped her when she was 13 years old. Her words have never been retracted or debunked. C

Detailed fact-check analysis of: KATIE JOHNSON: "Mr. Trump had another girl and I dress as maids and pretend to clean the room. The other girl, Maria, was 12 years old. Mr. Trump ordered us to carry out a string of sex acts on each other and on him. After he finished he said "we both could have done better" and then left." (from her sworn affidavit about the 3rd encounter where Trump raped her when she was 13 years old. Her words have never been retracted or debunked. C

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Donald Trump sexually assaulted and physically abused "Katie Johnson" when she was 13 years old,
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Donald Trump sexually assaulted and physically abused "Katie Johnson" when she was 13 years old,

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donald Trump sexually assaulted and physically abused "Katie Johnson" when she was 13 years old,

Aug 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Speaker Mike Johnson publicly supported Ghislaine Maxwell testifying and pushed for full disclosure of Epstein documents, but subsequently orchestrated House recess and blocked floor action to avoid actual votes on releasing the testimony or records.
Partially True

Fact Check: Speaker Mike Johnson publicly supported Ghislaine Maxwell testifying and pushed for full disclosure of Epstein documents, but subsequently orchestrated House recess and blocked floor action to avoid actual votes on releasing the testimony or records.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Speaker Mike Johnson publicly supported Ghislaine Maxwell testifying and pushed for full disclosure of Epstein documents, but subsequently orchestrated House recess and blocked floor action to avoid actual votes on releasing the testimony or records.

Aug 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump claimed on the campaign trail that he knew nothing about Project 2025 — yet just six months into his term, he’s already pushed through 46% of its radical agenda to reshape the federal government.
Partially True

Fact Check: Trump claimed on the campaign trail that he knew nothing about Project 2025 — yet just six months into his term, he’s already pushed through 46% of its radical agenda to reshape the federal government.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump claimed on the campaign trail that he knew nothing about Project 2025 — yet just six months into his term, he’s already pushed through 46% of its radical agenda to reshape the federal government.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced that she was presenting evidence that then- President Barack Obama's team laid the groundwork for the Russia-connected "coup" against Trump.
True

Fact Check: Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced that she was presenting evidence that then- President Barack Obama's team laid the groundwork for the Russia-connected "coup" against Trump.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced that she was presenting evidence that then- President Barack Obama's team laid the groundwork for the Russia-connected "coup" against Trump.

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks