TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Waymo are safer then Humans

Fact Check: Waymo are safer then Humans

Published May 17, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Are Waymo's Autonomous Vehicles Safer Than Human Drivers? ## Introduction The claim that "Waymo is safer than humans" refers to assertions made by ...

Are Waymo's Autonomous Vehicles Safer Than Human Drivers?

Introduction

The claim that "Waymo is safer than humans" refers to assertions made by Waymo and various studies suggesting that their autonomous vehicles (AVs) demonstrate significantly better safety records compared to human drivers. This claim has garnered attention as the technology behind self-driving cars continues to evolve and integrate into everyday transportation. However, the validity of this assertion requires careful examination of the available evidence, methodologies, and potential biases in the sources.

What We Know

  1. Waymo's Safety Performance: Waymo has published studies indicating that their autonomous driving system (ADS) has a lower crash rate compared to human drivers. According to Waymo, their vehicles have achieved an 85% reduction in crash rates involving injuries, with a reported incidence of 0.41 crashes per million miles compared to 2.78 for human drivers 2.

  2. Swiss Re Study: A study by Swiss Re, a global reinsurance company, claims that Waymo's AVs are significantly safer than human drivers. This study analyzed auto liability claims related to 25.3 million miles driven by Waymo and found an 88% reduction in property damage claims and a 92% reduction in injury claims when compared to human benchmarks 34.

  3. Comparative Analysis: Additional reports indicate that Waymo's vehicles have logged over 50 million miles, with significantly fewer incidents compared to human drivers. For instance, Waymo's vehicles reportedly experienced only 13 airbag crashes, suggesting an 83% reduction in such incidents compared to typical human driving 9.

  4. Broader Context: The comparison of AVs to human drivers is complex, as it involves various factors including driving conditions, types of roads, and the nature of the incidents. The studies often rely on specific methodologies that may not account for all variables affecting driving safety.

Analysis

Source Evaluation

  • Waymo's Own Reports: The data from Waymo 12 is self-reported and may carry inherent bias, as the company has a vested interest in promoting its technology as safer. While the methodologies used in their studies are detailed, independent verification is crucial for establishing credibility.

  • Swiss Re Study: The Swiss Re study 348 is more credible due to its independent nature. However, it is essential to consider that Swiss Re operates within the insurance industry, which may influence its perspective on AV safety due to potential impacts on liability claims and insurance models.

  • Media Reports: Articles from sources like NBC Bay Area 6 and Ars Technica 9 provide summaries of these studies but may not delve deeply into the methodologies used or the potential limitations of the data. While they can offer valuable insights, they should be approached with caution, as media outlets may prioritize sensational headlines over nuanced analysis.

Methodological Concerns

  • Data Collection: The methodologies employed in these studies often involve comparing specific metrics (e.g., crash rates per million miles). However, the context of these miles driven—such as urban vs. rural settings, traffic conditions, and the presence of pedestrians—can significantly affect safety outcomes.

  • Benchmarking Against Human Drivers: The benchmarks used for human drivers are critical. If the human baseline is derived from a limited or biased dataset, it could skew the results in favor of AVs. The reliability of the human benchmark data from Swiss Re, which includes over 500,000 claims, appears robust but warrants further scrutiny regarding its representativeness of all driving conditions 4.

Conflicts of Interest

  • Industry Influence: Waymo's position as a leading AV developer means that its findings may be viewed as promotional rather than purely scientific. The potential for conflicts of interest exists, particularly in how data is presented and interpreted.

  • Insurance Perspectives: Swiss Re's involvement in the study could reflect an interest in promoting AVs as a means to reduce liability claims, which may influence the framing of their findings.

What Additional Information Would Be Helpful?

  • Independent Verification: More independent studies that replicate Waymo's findings using different methodologies and datasets would enhance the credibility of the claim.

  • Longitudinal Studies: Long-term data on the performance of AVs compared to human drivers across various conditions would provide a more comprehensive understanding of safety implications.

  • Detailed Methodologies: Access to the full methodologies used in the studies, including how human benchmarks are established and the specific conditions under which data was collected, would allow for a more thorough evaluation of the claims.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim that Waymo's autonomous vehicles are safer than human drivers is partially true based on the evidence presented. Waymo's own reports and the Swiss Re study indicate significant reductions in crash rates and claims when comparing their AVs to human drivers. However, the self-reported nature of Waymo's data raises concerns about potential bias, and the methodologies used in these studies may not fully account for all relevant variables affecting driving safety.

The complexity of comparing AVs to human drivers, alongside potential conflicts of interest from both Waymo and the insurance industry, adds further nuance to the claim. While the evidence suggests that Waymo's AVs may be safer in certain contexts, the limitations in data and methodology necessitate caution in drawing definitive conclusions.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the information presented and consider the broader context when assessing the safety of autonomous vehicles compared to human drivers.

Sources

  1. Comparative safety performance of autonomous and human drivers - Waymo. Link
  2. Waymo significantly outperforms comparable human benchmarks over 7 million - Waymo Blog. Link
  3. Waymo's AVs Safer Than Human Drivers, Swiss Re Study Finds. Link
  4. New Swiss Re study: Waymo is safer than even the most advanced human - Waymo Blog. Link
  5. Waymo robotaxis are safer than human drivers | GrowSF.org. Link
  6. Waymo's robotaxis surpass 25 million miles, but are they safer than - NBC Bay Area. Link
  7. Waymo Reduces Crash Rates Compared to Human - AV Industry. Link
  8. How Waymo's AI-Driven Vehicles are Making Roads Safer. Link
  9. After 50 million miles, Waymos crash a lot less than human - Ars Technica. Link
  10. Comparison of Waymo Rider-Only crash rates by crash type to human - Taylor & Francis Online. Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Aug 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: National debt, 1960: $286 billion National debt, 2025: $36.2 TRILLION Are our communities safer? Is it easier to raise a family? Did we improve education? How about infrastructure? If not, then what the hell did they do with that $36,200,000,000,000?
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: National debt, 1960: $286 billion National debt, 2025: $36.2 TRILLION Are our communities safer? Is it easier to raise a family? Did we improve education? How about infrastructure? If not, then what the hell did they do with that $36,200,000,000,000?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: National debt, 1960: $286 billion National debt, 2025: $36.2 TRILLION Are our communities safer? Is it easier to raise a family? Did we improve education? How about infrastructure? If not, then what the hell did they do with that $36,200,000,000,000?

Mar 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Actually crime rates are higher in red states then blue states.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Actually crime rates are higher in red states then blue states.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Actually crime rates are higher in red states then blue states.

Aug 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: President Trump pulled out a satellite photo of a Taliban leader’s house, threatened to kill him if Americans were harmed, then walked out—after which no Americans were killed for 18 months.
Partially True

Fact Check: President Trump pulled out a satellite photo of a Taliban leader’s house, threatened to kill him if Americans were harmed, then walked out—after which no Americans were killed for 18 months.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: President Trump pulled out a satellite photo of a Taliban leader’s house, threatened to kill him if Americans were harmed, then walked out—after which no Americans were killed for 18 months.

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: I can promise you that NWS was NOT eradicated in 1966. I was a teen in the 1970s living/working on a ranch in far west Texas. The ranch had 2000 sheep at one time. We had many many cases of screw worm infestations. I became an expert open pasture roper during the summers. We roped the sheep and applied medicine (white king? then purple stuffin later years). I carried 2 ropes on my saddle and they smelled like a corpse. So much for facts.
Partially True

Fact Check: I can promise you that NWS was NOT eradicated in 1966. I was a teen in the 1970s living/working on a ranch in far west Texas. The ranch had 2000 sheep at one time. We had many many cases of screw worm infestations. I became an expert open pasture roper during the summers. We roped the sheep and applied medicine (white king? then purple stuffin later years). I carried 2 ropes on my saddle and they smelled like a corpse. So much for facts.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: I can promise you that NWS was NOT eradicated in 1966. I was a teen in the 1970s living/working on a ranch in far west Texas. The ranch had 2000 sheep at one time. We had many many cases of screw worm infestations. I became an expert open pasture roper during the summers. We roped the sheep and applied medicine (white king? then purple stuffin later years). I carried 2 ropes on my saddle and they smelled like a corpse. So much for facts.

Aug 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: vapes are healthier then cigarettes
Partially True

Fact Check: vapes are healthier then cigarettes

Detailed fact-check analysis of: vapes are healthier then cigarettes

Aug 15, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Waymo are safer then Humans | TruthOrFake Blog