Fact Check: USSR was first to land on moon

Fact Check: USSR was first to land on moon

Published March 13, 2025Updated June 18, 2025
VERDICT
False

# Fact Check: "USSR was first to land on moon" ## What We Know The claim that the USSR was the first to land on the Moon is inaccurate. The first suc...

Fact Check: "USSR was first to land on moon"

What We Know

The claim that the USSR was the first to land on the Moon is inaccurate. The first successful crewed lunar landing was achieved by the United States during the Apollo 11 mission on July 20, 1969. The Soviet Union did conduct a series of lunar missions, known as the Luna program, which included several significant achievements such as the first uncrewed soft landing on the Moon with Luna 9 on February 3, 1966, and the first photographs of the Moon's far side (Luna Mission - Lunar and Planetary Institute, Luna 9 - Wikipedia). However, despite ambitious plans, the Soviet Union never successfully landed a crewed mission on the Moon.

The Soviet crewed lunar programs were initiated in the 1960s, aiming to compete with the U.S. Apollo program. These included the Soyuz 7K-L1 (Zond) for lunar flybys and the N1-L3 program for lunar landings. However, both programs faced numerous challenges and were ultimately unsuccessful in achieving a crewed lunar landing before the U.S. (Soviet crewed lunar programs - Wikipedia). The N1 rocket, which was intended for crewed lunar missions, suffered from multiple failures, leading to the eventual cancellation of the Soviet crewed lunar landing program in the mid-1970s (Soviet crewed lunar programs - Wikipedia).

Analysis

The evidence clearly indicates that while the Soviet Union made significant contributions to lunar exploration, including robotic missions that achieved several "firsts," they did not land humans on the Moon. The Apollo 11 mission, which successfully landed astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on the lunar surface, marked the first time humans set foot on the Moon (Moon landing - Wikipedia).

The sources used for this fact-check are reliable and well-documented. Wikipedia entries on the Soviet crewed lunar programs and the Luna missions provide comprehensive overviews of the Soviet efforts, detailing their successes and failures. The Lunar and Planetary Institute also offers a thorough account of the Luna program's objectives and achievements, emphasizing that these missions were primarily robotic and did not include crewed landings (Luna Mission - Lunar and Planetary Institute).

Moreover, historical analyses from reputable sources, such as the National Air and Space Museum and HISTORY, corroborate the timeline and outcomes of the space race, affirming that the U.S. was the first to achieve a crewed lunar landing (What Was the Space Race? | National Air and Space Museum, The Soviet Response to the Moon Landing? Denial There Was a ... - HISTORY).

Conclusion

The claim that the USSR was the first to land on the Moon is False. The first successful crewed lunar landing was accomplished by the United States with Apollo 11 in 1969. Although the Soviet Union achieved several significant milestones in lunar exploration through robotic missions, they never succeeded in landing a crewed mission on the Moon.

Sources

  1. Soviet crewed lunar programs - Wikipedia
  2. Luna Mission - Lunar and Planetary Institute (LPI)
  3. What Was the Space Race? | National Air and Space Museum
  4. Luna 9 - Wikipedia
  5. Moon landing - Wikipedia
  6. Luna programme - Wikipedia
  7. A history of the Soviet Union's moonlanding Luna programme
  8. The Soviet Response to the Moon Landing? Denial There Was a ... - HISTORY

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Social security number issued after 2011 does not verify state inn the first three numbers. So Obama was either a non citizen or he was given a bogus number issued by the CIA. Yale University located in Conn. President and ex bones man Bush was head of CIA.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Social security number issued after 2011 does not verify state inn the first three numbers. So Obama was either a non citizen or he was given a bogus number issued by the CIA. Yale University located in Conn. President and ex bones man Bush was head of CIA.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Social security number issued after 2011 does not verify state inn the first three numbers. So Obama was either a non citizen or he was given a bogus number issued by the CIA. Yale University located in Conn. President and ex bones man Bush was head of CIA.

Aug 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 	
So now I may expose everything
they love hiding from
customers. First, half of the
security cameras at Walmart are
literally fake. I saw someone
open one up and it was
literally just a plastic shell.
They're just there to scare
you. Alright, they be hiding
this but y'all really can get a
seven hundred dollar Walmart
gift card. If you sign up at
700 WM. com, everyone is
qualified for this and I still
do this every month since I'm a
single mom. Next, if you find
something in Walmart that's
already been open or with
ripped packaging, you can ask
for a discount and we have to
give it to you. Okay now if you
comment Walmart in the comments
00:32
I'll send you a little bonus
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: So now I may expose everything they love hiding from customers. First, half of the security cameras at Walmart are literally fake. I saw someone open one up and it was literally just a plastic shell. They're just there to scare you. Alright, they be hiding this but y'all really can get a seven hundred dollar Walmart gift card. If you sign up at 700 WM. com, everyone is qualified for this and I still do this every month since I'm a single mom. Next, if you find something in Walmart that's already been open or with ripped packaging, you can ask for a discount and we have to give it to you. Okay now if you comment Walmart in the comments 00:32 I'll send you a little bonus

Detailed fact-check analysis of: So now I may expose everything they love hiding from customers. First, half of the security cameras at Walmart are literally fake. I saw someone open one up and it was literally just a plastic shell. They're just there to scare you. Alright, they be hiding this but y'all really can get a seven hundred dollar Walmart gift card. If you sign up at 700 WM. com, everyone is qualified for this and I still do this every month since I'm a single mom. Next, if you find something in Walmart that's already been open or with ripped packaging, you can ask for a discount and we have to give it to you. Okay now if you comment Walmart in the comments 00:32 I'll send you a little bonus

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  the President confirmed that First Lady Melania Trump is facing a critical and deeply private health battle
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: the President confirmed that First Lady Melania Trump is facing a critical and deeply private health battle

Detailed fact-check analysis of: the President confirmed that First Lady Melania Trump is facing a critical and deeply private health battle

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
911 was a false flag. For the
first 10 years, I did not think
anything other than the
official narrative then after
being shown a video, a close up
video of building number seven
coming down and that got me
going because it's obvious to
me that building seven was was
a controlled demolition because
the building collapses from the
bottom down. The trade centers
were unique in that they were
designed to withstand the
00:33
impact of a a a jet. From what
I understand the the outer
skeleton of the building. The
outer columns was like a a fish
net and you had these inner
core columns which was
substantial thick steel beams
to withstand four or five times
what the loads were. Got it.
The engineers always over
design a building. No steel
frame building has ever
collapsed before or since 9/
eleven. So that should say
something right there. And it
said that building seven it was
01:05
aggressive collapse that it was
caused by fire but progressive
collapse unlike the twin
towers, the twin towers
collapse from the top down.
That's a progressive collapse.
Sure. Floor by floor by floor.
But if you look at the videos
of building seven collapsing,
it collapses uniformly, it's
collapsing from the bottom, the
building stays intact all the
way to the bottom of the ground
and you could see the sides
caving in on it. For a building
to collapse uniformly which the
video show all the load bearing
it would have to have failed
01:36
simultaneously. Now, fire
doesn't act like that. I came
across an analogy of the twin
towers and if you could
visualize cast iron stoves
stacked. One on top of each
other. The stoves up at the
top. Yes, there's fire and
they've been damaged but the
stoves on the bottom, they
haven't been damaged. Okay. So,
the structure underneath all of
that is intact. So, it's
impossible for a building to
collapse near free fall speed
and increase. Without a
02:07
controlled demolition. You're
running into the path of most
resistance. I something else is
going on. I don't believe that
it was just the planes or the
fires I think that and they
examine the dust and they found
what they call thermitic
material which is like a
explosive incendiary which was
in the dust samples and that's
documented. There were reports
of the buildings were
undergoing a extensive elevator
renovation in the two or three
years prior to all kinds of
02:40
workers they had access to the
the core the cores of the
building and on the day of the
attack the the elevator company
would not assist in the
operations of the elevators and
the elevator company was the
elevator company it
subsequently went out of
business and a couple of years
after that
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The massmurder of at least 60 million white Orthodox Christians and Muslims in USSR was committed by a 95% Jewish government.

The Bolsheviks killed 60 million people and you never once heard about that in school!
False

Fact Check: The massmurder of at least 60 million white Orthodox Christians and Muslims in USSR was committed by a 95% Jewish government. The Bolsheviks killed 60 million people and you never once heard about that in school!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The massmurder of at least 60 million white Orthodox Christians and Muslims in USSR was committed by a 95% Jewish government. The Bolsheviks killed 60 million people and you never once heard about that in school!

Mar 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Elon Musk and the U.S. President in Heated Clash After Controversial Encounter With First Lady In a shocking development t
False

Fact Check: Elon Musk and the U.S. President in Heated Clash After Controversial Encounter With First Lady In a shocking development t

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Elon Musk and the U.S. President in Heated Clash After Controversial Encounter With First Lady In a shocking development t

Jul 14, 2025
Read more →