Fact Check: Trump had sought a hearing before the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit after a three-judge panel declined to overturn the judgment.

Fact Check: Did Trump Seek a Hearing Before the Full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit?

What We Know

The claim states that Donald Trump sought a hearing before the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit after a three-judge panel declined to overturn a judgment against him. Recent reports confirm that the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Trump's request to rehear his appeal regarding a $5 million judgment in the E. Jean Carroll case, where he was found liable for battery and defamation (ABC News, CNBC). This rejection indicates that Trump's legal team did indeed pursue further review after the initial panel's decision.

Analysis

The evidence supporting the claim comes from multiple reliable news sources, including ABC News and CNBC, both of which reported on the 2nd Circuit's decision to deny Trump's request for a rehearing. These sources are credible and well-established in the field of journalism, providing a solid basis for the information presented.

However, while the claim is accurate in stating that Trump sought a rehearing, it lacks specific details about the nature of the request and the context surrounding it. For instance, the reports do not clarify whether Trump formally filed a petition for a rehearing en banc (by the full court) or if he simply expressed a desire for further review. This distinction is important because the procedural steps involved in such requests can vary significantly.

Additionally, the sources do not provide information on the legal strategies or arguments presented by Trump's team in their attempt to overturn the judgment. This lack of detail leaves some ambiguity around the claim, necessitating further investigation into the specific legal actions taken by Trump's lawyers.

Conclusion

Needs Research: While the claim that Trump sought a hearing before the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit is supported by credible sources, the lack of detailed procedural context and the nature of the request leaves room for further inquiry. More information is needed to fully understand the implications of Trump's legal maneuvers in this case.

Sources

1. Supreme Court Procedures
2. PRACTITIONER'S HANDBOOK FOR APPEALS
3. Qui est Massad Boulos, ce libanais conseiller de TRUMP
4. Appeals court rejects Trump's bid to challenge $5 million E. Jean Carroll judgment
5. Pourquoi ce chapeau de Melania Trump - JForum
6. Donald Trump est-il sur le point de tuer le marché des voitures électriques
7. Trump loses bid to rehear E. Jean Carroll case appeal
8. Trump ; Je classe déjà l’UE comme un pays du tiers monde