TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Tom Homan, the White House border czar, stated that ICE will increase work site enforcement operations in sanctuary jurisdictions that limit the agency's access to local jails.

Fact Check: Tom Homan, the White House border czar, stated that ICE will increase work site enforcement operations in sanctuary jurisdictions that limit the agency's access to local jails.

Published June 15, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Tom Homan, the White House border czar, stated that ICE will increase work site enforcement operations in sanctuary jurisdictions that ...

Fact Check: "Tom Homan, the White House border czar, stated that ICE will increase work site enforcement operations in sanctuary jurisdictions that limit the agency's access to local jails."

What We Know

Tom Homan, who served as the acting director of ICE and has been appointed as the White House border czar, has made several statements regarding immigration enforcement in sanctuary jurisdictions. In a recent statement, Homan emphasized that ICE would increase its operations in areas that limit the agency's access to local jails, particularly targeting work sites in these jurisdictions (source-1). He has been quoted saying that sanctuary cities "will get exactly what they don't want, more officers in the communities and more officers at the work sites" (source-8). This aligns with his broader strategy to counteract local policies that he believes hinder federal immigration enforcement.

Analysis

Homan's statements have been consistent across various platforms. He has repeatedly indicated that ICE will not be deterred by local sanctuary policies and will instead intensify enforcement actions, including worksite raids (source-4). This approach is part of a larger initiative to prioritize the removal of undocumented immigrants, particularly those with criminal records, from communities that do not cooperate with federal immigration authorities (source-5).

The reliability of Homan's statements can be assessed through the context of his role and past actions. As a former head of ICE, he has firsthand experience with immigration enforcement policies and practices. However, it is important to note that his statements may carry a political bias, as they align with the Trump administration's hardline stance on immigration. This could influence how his statements are perceived by different audiences.

Moreover, the implications of Homan's statements have been met with criticism from immigrant rights advocates and local officials in sanctuary jurisdictions, who argue that increased ICE presence can lead to fear and distrust within communities (source-6).

Conclusion

The claim that Tom Homan stated that ICE will increase work site enforcement operations in sanctuary jurisdictions is True. Homan has articulated a clear intention to ramp up enforcement actions in these areas, directly linking them to the limitations imposed by local policies on ICE's operational access. His statements reflect a consistent strategy aimed at counteracting sanctuary city policies.

Sources

  1. Statement from ICE Acting Director Thomas Homan regarding California Sanctuary Legislation
  2. PDF Statement Summary of Thomas D Homan - Congress.gov
  3. ICE statement on immigration enforcement activities in Northern California
  4. Trump's border czar says immigration raids will begin next week, including in Chicago
  5. Homan: Sanctuary cities will keep seeing 'collateral' ICE arrests
  6. Trump's border czar threatens arrest for immigration officials
  7. ICE Enforcement Escalates: Impacts on Sanctuary Cities and Employers
  8. Trump curbs immigration enforcement at farms, meatpacking plants, hotels, restaurants

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: 1. Market Attraction and Outreach • Are we effectively targeting overnight visitors from Tucson and Phoenix, our two largest markets? How can we improve our outreach and engagement strategies to attract more long-term guests from these key regions? • Are there untapped markets, such as Albuquerque or Houston, that we should pursue more aggressively? What customized marketing or partnerships could help us reach these potential visitors? • Are our online and in-person efforts sufficient to connect with our highest-volume markets? How can we leverage digital marketing, social media, and local partnerships to increase visibility? • Are we telling compelling stories that resonate with potential visitors from places like Denver or Las Vegas? What narratives or unique selling points could better showcase what Cochise County offers? ________________________________________ 2. Understanding Visitor Behavior and Enhancing Stay Duration • Why do visitors from farther away (Dallas, L.A., Las Vegas) tend to stay longer than local Arizonans? What aspects of our offerings appeal to out-of-state visitors, and how can we replicate or enhance those features? • What specific experiences or amenities could we add to encourage longer stays? Are there activities, events, or accommodations that could keep visitors engaged and extend their visits? • How can we foster repeat visitation and encourage visitors to share their experiences with others? What loyalty programs, referral incentives, or community engagement initiatives could support this? ________________________________________ 3. Seasonal Planning and Business Collaboration • Are we prepared to maximize revenue during peak months like March and October? What marketing campaigns, special events, or package deals can we implement to capitalize on these periods? • What strategies can we adopt during slower months (June, July, August) to attract more visitors? Could off-season promotions, themed events, or targeted advertising fill the gap? • How can local businesses collaborate to turn single-night stays into multi-night visits? Are there bundled packages, cross-promotions, or joint events that encourage longer stays? • What small changes or new offerings (events, experiences, packages) could boost tourism during quieter months? How can we creatively leverage local heritage, outdoor activities, or seasonal festivals? ________________________________________ 4. Enhancing Visitor Experience and Community Engagement • How can we better welcome and serve visitors from Tucson and Phoenix, who already love Cochise County? Are there tailored experiences or concierge services that could deepen their connection? • How can our businesses support each other to leave a strong, lasting impression on first-time visitors? Can we develop cross-business collaborations, shared marketing efforts, or community ambassador programs? • How can we celebrate our heritage while offering fresh, innovative experiences to attract new guests? What storytelling, cultural events, or experiential tourism can showcase our unique identity? • Are there stories or local narratives we’re not telling enough, which could attract diverse markets? How can storytelling be integrated into our marketing to highlight authenticity and appeal? ________________________________________ 5. Long-term Community and Economic Sustainability • What does this visitor data suggest about staffing, marketing, and infrastructure planning for the upcoming year? How can we align resources to meet demand during peak times and prepare for slower periods? • How do we ensure that tourism supports and strengthens our community and economy sustainably? What measures can we implement to balance growth with community well-being, environmental preservation, and local culture?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 1. Market Attraction and Outreach • Are we effectively targeting overnight visitors from Tucson and Phoenix, our two largest markets? How can we improve our outreach and engagement strategies to attract more long-term guests from these key regions? • Are there untapped markets, such as Albuquerque or Houston, that we should pursue more aggressively? What customized marketing or partnerships could help us reach these potential visitors? • Are our online and in-person efforts sufficient to connect with our highest-volume markets? How can we leverage digital marketing, social media, and local partnerships to increase visibility? • Are we telling compelling stories that resonate with potential visitors from places like Denver or Las Vegas? What narratives or unique selling points could better showcase what Cochise County offers? ________________________________________ 2. Understanding Visitor Behavior and Enhancing Stay Duration • Why do visitors from farther away (Dallas, L.A., Las Vegas) tend to stay longer than local Arizonans? What aspects of our offerings appeal to out-of-state visitors, and how can we replicate or enhance those features? • What specific experiences or amenities could we add to encourage longer stays? Are there activities, events, or accommodations that could keep visitors engaged and extend their visits? • How can we foster repeat visitation and encourage visitors to share their experiences with others? What loyalty programs, referral incentives, or community engagement initiatives could support this? ________________________________________ 3. Seasonal Planning and Business Collaboration • Are we prepared to maximize revenue during peak months like March and October? What marketing campaigns, special events, or package deals can we implement to capitalize on these periods? • What strategies can we adopt during slower months (June, July, August) to attract more visitors? Could off-season promotions, themed events, or targeted advertising fill the gap? • How can local businesses collaborate to turn single-night stays into multi-night visits? Are there bundled packages, cross-promotions, or joint events that encourage longer stays? • What small changes or new offerings (events, experiences, packages) could boost tourism during quieter months? How can we creatively leverage local heritage, outdoor activities, or seasonal festivals? ________________________________________ 4. Enhancing Visitor Experience and Community Engagement • How can we better welcome and serve visitors from Tucson and Phoenix, who already love Cochise County? Are there tailored experiences or concierge services that could deepen their connection? • How can our businesses support each other to leave a strong, lasting impression on first-time visitors? Can we develop cross-business collaborations, shared marketing efforts, or community ambassador programs? • How can we celebrate our heritage while offering fresh, innovative experiences to attract new guests? What storytelling, cultural events, or experiential tourism can showcase our unique identity? • Are there stories or local narratives we’re not telling enough, which could attract diverse markets? How can storytelling be integrated into our marketing to highlight authenticity and appeal? ________________________________________ 5. Long-term Community and Economic Sustainability • What does this visitor data suggest about staffing, marketing, and infrastructure planning for the upcoming year? How can we align resources to meet demand during peak times and prepare for slower periods? • How do we ensure that tourism supports and strengthens our community and economy sustainably? What measures can we implement to balance growth with community well-being, environmental preservation, and local culture?

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Tom Homan will run the biggest deportation operation this country has ever seen.
Partially True

Fact Check: Tom Homan will run the biggest deportation operation this country has ever seen.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Tom Homan will run the biggest deportation operation this country has ever seen.

Jul 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Immigration and Customs Enforcement will become the largest law enforcement agency in the country.
False

Fact Check: Immigration and Customs Enforcement will become the largest law enforcement agency in the country.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Immigration and Customs Enforcement will become the largest law enforcement agency in the country.

Jul 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: ormer Interim NYPD Police Commissioner Tom Donlon in his lawsuit alleges that Tarik Sheppard "fraudulently orchestrated his own promotion granting himself greater authority and a higher salary"
True

Fact Check: ormer Interim NYPD Police Commissioner Tom Donlon in his lawsuit alleges that Tarik Sheppard "fraudulently orchestrated his own promotion granting himself greater authority and a higher salary"

Detailed fact-check analysis of: ormer Interim NYPD Police Commissioner Tom Donlon in his lawsuit alleges that Tarik Sheppard "fraudulently orchestrated his own promotion granting himself greater authority and a higher salary"

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks