Fact Check: THIS IS STRAIGHT OUT OF THE MAGA PROJECT 2025 : PLEASE READ THIS ARTICLE AND SHARE FAR AND WIDE ❤ THANK YOU FOLKS ❤ LIKE THE MAGA, THE PP HAS A 100 DAY AGENDA : The first rule of Fight Club is you do not talk about Fight Club. Over the past year, if you asked around Ottawa about the transition team that was planning Pierre Poilievre’s first days in government, you were likely to be met with shrugs. The members of the team were not named, and those in the know were not talking. Even The Hill Times, the Ottawa parliamentary affairs outlet that excels at digging up gossipy news, had come up empty-handed. At the outset of 2025, they approached a dozen Conservatives close to Poilievre, all of whom stayed tight-lipped. His campaign manager Jenni Byrne ran a very tight organization, and slip-ups might incur her wrath. Besides, any operative whose party is on the verge of power knows it’s best to maintain utmost organizational secrecy. Such discipline, however, sometimes falters under the influence of a few drinks. That’s what Bryan Evans, a political science professor at Toronto Metropolitan University, found out in late 2024. Around the winter holidays, he ducked into his neighbourhood bar and ran into an old acquaintance. The man wasn’t himself on the transition team, but it turned out he was deeply informed. They slid onto stools for a conversation. While they didn’t run in the same circles, and certainly didn’t share political opinions, his acquaintance knew that Evans had an understanding and appreciation for the machinery of government. For ten years he was employed by the Ontario government, including a stint in the Ministry of Labour after Progressive Conservative Mike Harris had come to power in the mid 1990s. Relying on insights from that experience, he wrote his doctoral dissertation on that government and its radical agenda. In December 2024, Poilievre was riding high in the polls, as he had been for nearly two years. So maybe it was the overconfidence talking. Over beers, Evans’s drinking companion laid out more about the transition planning than anything yet discovered by well-connected reporters in the establishment media. The group was preparing for a Poilievre government to hit the ground running. It was going to be a blitzkrieg. “You were there at the start of the Mike Harris government.” “Yeah,” Evans said. “That’s going to be the playbook.” It was an ominous sign. Mike Harris’s government had moved quickly to make dramatic reforms. They had a hundred-day agenda, and they got a lot done: laying off public sector employees, cutting funding to education, slashing social assistance rates, deregulating industries, repealing equity laws, selling off Crown corporations, and empowering the government to impose user fees on public services. “It’s going to come hard and fast from every direction again,” Evan’s acquaintance said. The groups and communities impacted, as well as the political opposition, both inside Parliament and outside, would have to fight on dozens of fronts at once. One of Harris’s key first steps was to balance the budget as a way of supercharging their plans, according to Guy Giorno, the premier’s top strategist. He described this as their “agenda within the agenda,” the “factor which meant that absolutely everybody rolled in the same direction.” It began the process of shrinking public spending, and was followed up by deregulation, rolling back labour protections, freezing the minimum wage, and encouraging the subcontracting of public services. Back in the 1990s, Harris had been convinced by Alberta Premier Ralph Klein’s advisors that he would have to move speedily to implement his agenda, lest he get tripped up by protests or a stubborn public service. Those advisors had once encouraged Klein to read the work of economist Milton Friedman (Pierre Poilievre’s own ideological guru). In the 1980’s, Friedman had written that “a new administration has some six to nine months in which to achieve major changes; if it does not seize the opportunity to act decisively during that period, it will not have another such opportunity.” It’s the lesson Friedman had drawn from his first laboratory, Chile. After the U.S. backed overthrow of democratic socialist Salvador Allende, the military dictator Augusto Pinochet had instituted a violent, rapid-fire makeover of the economy, following Friedman’s radical free market rulebook: privatization, deregulation, cutbacks to the public sector, and attacks on labour unions. Purging the public service As for the composition of Poilievre’s transition group, Bryan Evans’ acquaintance belatedly recalled his Fight Club rules. He wouldn’t divulge names, but offered some ideas. There were Poilievre’s policy advisors, as well as some former senior public servants, lawyers, and an ex-Cabinet minister. He admitted that some people who had been around for the Mike Harris days were in there too. Even before they were sworn in as the government in 1995, Harris’s team had laid groundwork within the public service to ensure they could take swift control of the levers of power. Members of his transition team had shown up to their first meeting with outgoing NDP government officials with a list of six high-ranking deputy ministers they wanted to meet quickly. Those civil servants were the A-list, empowered to advise and serve Harris’s agenda; several others, considered unfriendly, received their pink slips as part of a careful purge. As one NDP official remarked, his own party had “assumed office, but never took power. These guys are taking power even before they have assumed office.” Poilievre’s transition team also was thinking very strategically about how they would wield the machinery of the state. Who did they want to bring into the higher ranks of public service to help advance their plans? Who should be removed? And who might they want for the most important position of all, the top ranking civil servant, the Clerk of the Privy Council? These were some of the questions they were asking while plotting their first moves. When it came to policy plans, one crucial difference between the two eras was that Mike Harris’ Conservatives publicly had rolled out their agenda years in advance. Harris’s young ideologues put out detailed papers, organized policy conferences, eventually published a manifesto, the Common Sense Revolution, of which they printed 2.5 million copies. Everyone knew what was coming, even if it would still shock people when it arrived and extend far beyond what Harris had promised. Would Poilievre’s team, for instance, follow Mike Harris’s “playbook” on healthcare? Harris had lulled Ontario into complacency by assuaging voters’ fears about protecting health services. Their manifesto was crystal clear: “We will not cut healthcare spending.” But the result turned out to look very different: forty hospital closures, 25,000 staff laid off, and declining per capita real funding at a time of growing need. Poilievre’s team, by contrast, hadn’t laid out many policy details. And yet, over the years and in the run-up to the spring of 2025, Poilievre had telegraphed a lot in past election platforms, online videos, and podcast interviews with Jordan Peterson. It hinted at what his sweeping agenda would entail if he was able to secure a majority government—an assault on the country’s collective assets and already tattered social programs, a renewed attack on unions, activist and Indigenous defenders, and a bonanza of deregulation and privatization that would make his billionaire backers cheer. This is an excerpt from Martin Lukacs’s THE POILIEVRE PROJECT : A RADICAL BLUEPRINT FOR CORPORATE RULE published by Breach Books and available for order.

April 6, 2025by TruthOrFake
?
VERDICT
Unverified

Analyzing Claims About Pierre Poilievre's Transition Team and Its Agenda

Introduction

The claim under scrutiny discusses the alleged plans of Pierre Poilievre's transition team for a potential government, drawing parallels to the aggressive strategies employed by former Ontario Premier Mike Harris. The narrative suggests that Poilievre's team is preparing a "blitzkrieg" of cuts and reforms, based on insights shared by an unnamed acquaintance of political science professor Bryan Evans. The claim also references a broader context of conservative governance and its historical implications, particularly in relation to the "MAGA Project 2025."

What We Know

  1. Pierre Poilievre is the leader of the Conservative Party of Canada and has been a Member of Parliament since 2004. He has been vocal about his vision for Canada, which includes significant reforms and a critique of the current government 3.

  2. Mike Harris's Government: Harris's administration (1995-2002) is noted for its rapid implementation of conservative policies, including cuts to public services and deregulation. His government famously introduced a "Common Sense Revolution," which outlined aggressive fiscal policies 410.

  3. Transition Teams: Transition teams are common in politics, tasked with preparing incoming administrations for governance. Poilievre's transition team has not publicly disclosed its members, leading to speculation about its composition and agenda 6.

  4. Bryan Evans: A political science professor who reportedly overheard insights about Poilievre's transition planning during a casual conversation. His acquaintance, while unnamed, suggested that the team is preparing for a swift and comprehensive implementation of policy changes, reminiscent of the Harris era 19.

  5. Public Sentiment: Polls indicate that a significant portion of Canadians, including some Liberal voters, resonate with Poilievre's critiques of the current government, suggesting a potential base for support if he were to assume power 7.

Analysis

The claim presents a narrative that combines anecdotal evidence with historical context to suggest a deliberate and strategic approach by Poilievre's team. However, several factors warrant critical examination:

  • Source Reliability: The primary source of the claim is an article by Martin Lukacs published by Breach Media, which has a reputation for left-leaning commentary. This could introduce bias, as the outlet may have an agenda to portray Poilievre negatively 1. The article's reliance on an informal conversation for key insights raises questions about the verifiability of the claims made.

  • Anecdotal Evidence: The insights attributed to Evans's acquaintance are anecdotal and lack corroboration from other sources. While they provide a narrative framework, they do not constitute definitive evidence of Poilievre's plans. The absence of named sources or direct quotes from individuals involved in the transition team further complicates the claim's credibility.

  • Historical Context: The comparison to Mike Harris's government is significant, as it frames Poilievre's potential governance style. However, historical parallels can be misleading if not carefully contextualized. The political landscape has evolved since the 1990s, and the specific conditions that allowed Harris to implement his agenda may not be present today.

  • Potential Conflicts of Interest: The sources discussing Poilievre's transition plans, including those with ties to previous conservative administrations, may have their own biases or interests that could color their perspectives. This is particularly relevant in political discourse, where narratives can be shaped to align with specific agendas.

  • Lack of Specific Policy Details: While the article discusses the potential for a "blitzkrieg" of cuts, it does not provide specific policy proposals or actions that Poilievre's team might pursue. This lack of detail makes it challenging to assess the validity of the claims regarding the transition team's agenda.

Conclusion

Verdict: Unverified

The claim regarding Pierre Poilievre's transition team and its alleged agenda remains unverified due to several key factors. The primary evidence stems from anecdotal insights shared by an unnamed acquaintance of a political science professor, which lack corroboration and are not substantiated by direct quotes or named sources. Furthermore, the reliance on a potentially biased media outlet raises questions about the reliability of the information presented.

While historical comparisons to Mike Harris's administration provide context, they do not definitively indicate Poilievre's intentions or strategies, especially given the evolving political landscape. The absence of specific policy proposals or actions further complicates the assessment of the claim's validity.

It is important to acknowledge the limitations in the available evidence, as the lack of transparency regarding Poilievre's transition team and its plans leaves room for speculation. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider the sources and context behind claims before drawing conclusions.

Sources

  1. ‘Hard and fast from every direction’: inside the group plotting Poilievre’s blitzkrieg of cuts. Breach Media. Link
  2. What is Project 2025? Wish list for Trump second term, explained. BBC. Link
  3. Pierre Poilievre - Wikipedia. Link
  4. Alister Campbell: Pierre Poilievre has a chance to be a transformational Conservative PM. Will he seize it? The Hub. Link
  5. Has Canada found its Trump? POLITICO. Link
  6. Poilievre's transition team must contend with U.S. trade war issues and ... The Hill Times. Link
  7. 10 Campaign Promises That Define Pierre Poilievre's Vision. Pierre Poilievre News. Link
  8. Why the Liberals' Hopes Aren't Dead Yet. The Tyee. Link
  9. ‘Hard and fast from every direction’: inside the group plotting Poilievre’s blitzkrieg of cuts. Anarchist Federation. Link
  10. Alister Campbell: What Pierre Poilievre can learn from Mike Harris. The Hub. Link

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

Have a claim you want to verify?

Have a claim you want to verify?

Our AI-powered fact-checker can analyze any claim against reliable sources and provide you with an evidence-based verdict.