Fact Check: the US president can control the fed

Fact Check: the US president can control the fed

Published April 9, 2025โ€ข
โœ—
VERDICT
Mostly False

# The Claim: "The US president can control the Fed" The assertion that the President of the United States can control the Federal Reserve (Fed) raise...

The Claim: "The US president can control the Fed"

The assertion that the President of the United States can control the Federal Reserve (Fed) raises significant questions about the nature of the relationship between the executive branch and the central bank. The claim suggests a direct influence or control over monetary policy and the operations of the Fed, which is traditionally viewed as an independent entity. This article will explore the nuances of this claim, examining the legal framework, historical context, and the perspectives of various experts.

What We Know

  1. Independence of the Federal Reserve: The Federal Reserve was established by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, designed to operate independently of political pressures to ensure stable monetary policy. This independence is a cornerstone of its function, allowing it to make decisions based on economic data rather than political considerations 2.

  2. Presidential Appointments: The President does have the power to appoint members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, which can influence the Fed's direction. However, these appointments require Senate confirmation, and the terms of governors are staggered, which limits the President's ability to exert immediate control 59.

  3. Removal of Fed Officials: The President has the authority to remove the Chair of the Federal Reserve, but this power is not absolute. Legal interpretations suggest that such removals must be for cause, and the President cannot unilaterally dictate monetary policy 610.

  4. Historical Context: The relationship between the presidency and the Fed has evolved, particularly during times of economic crisis. For instance, during the 2008 financial crisis, the Fed took unprecedented actions that were supported by the executive branch, highlighting a collaborative approach rather than direct control 4.

  5. Public Perception and Influence: While the President can influence economic policy through public statements and legislative agendas, the actual control over monetary policy remains with the Fed. This indirect influence is often more about shaping the economic environment rather than direct control 5.

Analysis

The claim that the President can control the Fed is complex and requires careful examination of the sources and their credibility:

  • Source Credibility: The Brookings Institution, a well-respected think tank, provides a thorough analysis of the Fed's independence, emphasizing that while the President can influence appointments, the Fed operates independently in its decision-making 2. This source is generally reliable and free from overt bias.

  • Legal Perspectives: The Cornell Law Review article discusses the legal framework surrounding the President's powers concerning the Fed, indicating that while the President can remove Fed leaders, this power is constrained by legal precedents that emphasize the Fed's independence 6. This source is credible, as it is published in a peer-reviewed legal journal.

  • Public Opinion and Political Influence: The article from Wharton highlights concerns about presidential influence over monetary policy, suggesting that while the President can advocate for certain policies, the Fed's independence is crucial for maintaining economic stability 4. This source is reputable, but it may reflect a bias towards maintaining institutional independence.

  • Historical Context: NPR's coverage of past presidential claims regarding control over independent agencies provides context about the evolving nature of this relationship, particularly during politically charged periods 10. NPR is generally regarded as a reliable news source, though it may have a slight liberal bias.

Conflicts of Interest

Some sources may have inherent biases based on their institutional affiliations or the political climate during publication. For instance, think tanks may promote specific economic ideologies that could color their interpretations of the relationship between the presidency and the Fed.

Methodological Concerns

The analysis of presidential influence over the Fed often relies on qualitative assessments rather than quantitative data. More empirical research examining the outcomes of presidential appointments or public statements on Fed policy could provide clearer insights into the nature of this influence.

What Additional Information Would Be Helpful

To further understand the dynamics between the presidency and the Federal Reserve, additional information would be beneficial, including:

  • Historical Case Studies: Detailed case studies of specific presidencies and their interactions with the Fed during economic crises could illuminate patterns of influence.
  • Quantitative Data: Empirical studies measuring the impact of presidential appointments on Fed policy decisions over time would enhance the analysis.
  • Expert Testimonies: Insights from economists and political scientists specializing in monetary policy and executive power could provide a more nuanced understanding of the claim.

Conclusion

Verdict: Mostly False

The claim that the President of the United States can control the Federal Reserve is "Mostly False." While the President has some influence over the Fed through appointments and public advocacy, the institution operates with a significant degree of independence, as established by law. The President's ability to directly control monetary policy is limited by legal constraints and the structure of the Fed itself.

This verdict acknowledges that while there are avenues for presidential influence, such as the appointment of board members and public statements, these do not equate to direct control over the Fed's operations or policy decisions. The historical context shows that the relationship is often collaborative, particularly during crises, rather than one of unilateral control.

It is important to recognize the limitations in the available evidence, as much of the analysis relies on qualitative assessments and interpretations of legal frameworks. More empirical research could provide a clearer understanding of the dynamics at play.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information regarding the relationship between the presidency and the Federal Reserve, considering the complexities and nuances involved.

Sources

  1. What power does the president have over the federal bureaucracy? Harvard Law School. Link
  2. Why is the Federal Reserve independent, and what does that mean in practice? Brookings. Link
  3. Keeping the Balance: What a President Can Do and Cannot Do. Truman Library. Link
  4. Why Presidential Influence Over Monetary Policy Should be Checked. Wharton. Link
  5. You Decide: Can the President Control the Economy? North Carolina State University. Link
  6. Article II and the Federal Reserve. Cornell Law Review. Link
  7. Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies. White House. Link
  8. The Fed Explained - Who We Are. Federal Reserve. Link
  9. Federal Reserve Board of Governors - Wikipedia. Link
  10. Trump claims expanded power over independent agencies. NPR. Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

๐Ÿ’ก Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
โœ“100% Free
โœ“No Registration
โœ“Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Karoline Leavitt <redacted_social_handle> Every month since President Trump took office, core inflation- the best measure of inflation- has beat or matched expectations. The data proves that President Trump is stabilizing inflation and the Panicans continue to be wrong about tariffs raising prices. Donald J. Trump <redacted_social_handle> Fed should cut Rates by 3 Points. Very Low Inflation. One Trillion Dollars a year would be saved!!! 429 ReTruths 1.57k Likes Jul 15, 2025, 10:08 AM
Partially True
๐ŸŽฏ Similar

Fact Check: Karoline Leavitt <redacted_social_handle> Every month since President Trump took office, core inflation- the best measure of inflation- has beat or matched expectations. The data proves that President Trump is stabilizing inflation and the Panicans continue to be wrong about tariffs raising prices. Donald J. Trump <redacted_social_handle> Fed should cut Rates by 3 Points. Very Low Inflation. One Trillion Dollars a year would be saved!!! 429 ReTruths 1.57k Likes Jul 15, 2025, 10:08 AM

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Karoline Leavitt <redacted_social_handle> Every month since President Trump took office, core inflation- the best measure of inflation- has beat or matched expectations. The data proves that President Trump is stabilizing inflation and the Panicans continue to be wrong about tariffs raising prices. Donald J. Trump <redacted_social_handle> Fed should cut Rates by 3 Points. Very Low Inflation. One Trillion Dollars a year would be saved!!! 429 ReTruths 1.57k Likes Jul 15, 2025, 10:08 AM

Jul 26, 2025
Read more โ†’
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
We have some news right now.
Ice detained a toddler, a
mother, and a grandmother. All
United States American citizens
just because they overheard
them speaking Spanish.
According to Telamundo, Puerto
Rico, these three American
citizens were taken into
custody in Milwaukee, Wisconsin
after Ice agents overheard them
speaking Spanish. This included
a toddler. A member of their
family says that they were
taken into custody while
shopping at a local department
store. And they didn't have a
chance to speak with Ice agents
until they were at the
detention facility. And when
they arrived they tried to
explain to Ice that they were
born in Puerto Rico that
they're American citizens. And
00:32
it wasn't until after they
provided documentation of proof
that Ice agents apologize and
that they were eventually
released. According to the
Daily Beast Daryl Marine the
national president of the
Hispanic Advocacy Group Forward
Latino has confirmed that these
three individuals were detained
by Ice. More and more American
citizens are being caught up in
these mass deportation rates
True
๐ŸŽฏ Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 We have some news right now. Ice detained a toddler, a mother, and a grandmother. All United States American citizens just because they overheard them speaking Spanish. According to Telamundo, Puerto Rico, these three American citizens were taken into custody in Milwaukee, Wisconsin after Ice agents overheard them speaking Spanish. This included a toddler. A member of their family says that they were taken into custody while shopping at a local department store. And they didn't have a chance to speak with Ice agents until they were at the detention facility. And when they arrived they tried to explain to Ice that they were born in Puerto Rico that they're American citizens. And 00:32 it wasn't until after they provided documentation of proof that Ice agents apologize and that they were eventually released. According to the Daily Beast Daryl Marine the national president of the Hispanic Advocacy Group Forward Latino has confirmed that these three individuals were detained by Ice. More and more American citizens are being caught up in these mass deportation rates

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 We have some news right now. Ice detained a toddler, a mother, and a grandmother. All United States American citizens just because they overheard them speaking Spanish. According to Telamundo, Puerto Rico, these three American citizens were taken into custody in Milwaukee, Wisconsin after Ice agents overheard them speaking Spanish. This included a toddler. A member of their family says that they were taken into custody while shopping at a local department store. And they didn't have a chance to speak with Ice agents until they were at the detention facility. And when they arrived they tried to explain to Ice that they were born in Puerto Rico that they're American citizens. And 00:32 it wasn't until after they provided documentation of proof that Ice agents apologize and that they were eventually released. According to the Daily Beast Daryl Marine the national president of the Hispanic Advocacy Group Forward Latino has confirmed that these three individuals were detained by Ice. More and more American citizens are being caught up in these mass deportation rates

Jul 27, 2025
Read more โ†’
Fact Check: SUPREME COURT REMOVES VP SARA DUTERTE AND SENATE PRESIDENT CHIZ ESCUDERO FROM OFFICE
False
๐ŸŽฏ Similar

Fact Check: SUPREME COURT REMOVES VP SARA DUTERTE AND SENATE PRESIDENT CHIZ ESCUDERO FROM OFFICE

Detailed fact-check analysis of: SUPREME COURT REMOVES VP SARA DUTERTE AND SENATE PRESIDENT CHIZ ESCUDERO FROM OFFICE

Jul 27, 2025
Read more โ†’
๐Ÿ”
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more โ†’
Fact Check: Trump's New Strategy on Epstein Fallout: Blame the Democrats President Trump said the outrage among his supporters over the Epstein case was just the latest "scam" cooked up by Democrats.
True

Fact Check: Trump's New Strategy on Epstein Fallout: Blame the Democrats President Trump said the outrage among his supporters over the Epstein case was just the latest "scam" cooked up by Democrats.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's New Strategy on Epstein Fallout: Blame the Democrats President Trump said the outrage among his supporters over the Epstein case was just the latest "scam" cooked up by Democrats.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more โ†’
Fact Check:  Senator Ashley Moody and President Trump just deliveredโ€”for YOU.

โœ… No tax on tips.
โœ… No tax on overtime.
โœ… Medicare protected.
Partially True

Fact Check: Senator Ashley Moody and President Trump just deliveredโ€”for YOU. โœ… No tax on tips. โœ… No tax on overtime. โœ… Medicare protected.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senator Ashley Moody and President Trump just deliveredโ€”for YOU. โœ… No tax on tips. โœ… No tax on overtime. โœ… Medicare protected.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more โ†’
Fact Check: the US president can control the fed | TruthOrFake Blog