Fact Check: The ranked-choice voting system in New York allows voters to rank up to five candidates on their ballots.

Fact Check: The ranked-choice voting system in New York allows voters to rank up to five candidates on their ballots.

Published June 14, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "The ranked-choice voting system in New York allows voters to rank up to five candidates on their ballots." ## What We Know The ranked-...

Fact Check: "The ranked-choice voting system in New York allows voters to rank up to five candidates on their ballots."

What We Know

The ranked-choice voting (RCV) system implemented in New York City allows voters to rank up to five candidates in order of their preference. This system was introduced for special and primary elections for various municipal offices, including Mayor, Public Advocate, Comptroller, Borough President, and City Council, following a charter amendment approved by voters in 2019 (Public Advocate, NYC Votes).

Under this system, voters can indicate their first, second, third, fourth, and fifth choices on their ballots. If a voter's top choice is eliminated during the counting process, their vote automatically transfers to their next highest-ranked candidate (NYC Votes, NYCLU). Importantly, voters are not required to rank all five candidates; they can choose to rank fewer candidates or just one (Public Advocate, NYC Votes).

Analysis

The claim that New York's ranked-choice voting system allows voters to rank up to five candidates is supported by multiple reliable sources. The Public Advocate and NYC Votes both explicitly state that voters can rank up to five candidates in order of preference. This information is consistent across various reputable sources, including the New York Civil Liberties Union and CNN, which also confirm the mechanics of the RCV system.

The sources used in this analysis are credible and provide a comprehensive overview of how ranked-choice voting works in New York City. They are produced by reputable organizations and government entities, which enhances their reliability. The information is consistent and corroborated across multiple platforms, indicating a strong consensus on the mechanics of the voting system.

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim that the ranked-choice voting system in New York allows voters to rank up to five candidates on their ballots is accurate. This system is designed to give voters more options and ensure that their preferences are taken into account, even if their top choice is not successful.

Sources

  1. Ranked Choice Voting Explained - Public Advocate
  2. Ranked Choice Voting for NYC Local Elections
  3. Ranked Choice Voting
  4. Ranked choice voting explained: What to know for New York City mayor…
  5. Explaining New York City's ranked-choice voting system ...
  6. Ranked Choice Voting in NYC: What You Need to Know
  7. Ranked-choice voting NYC explained for New York City ...
  8. Ranked Choice Voting: Lessons in Democracy Reform ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Ocasio-Cortez endorsed a slate of five candidates in the Democratic primary, making Zohran Mamdani her top choice under the city’s ranked-choice voting system.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Ocasio-Cortez endorsed a slate of five candidates in the Democratic primary, making Zohran Mamdani her top choice under the city’s ranked-choice voting system.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Ocasio-Cortez endorsed a slate of five candidates in the Democratic primary, making Zohran Mamdani her top choice under the city’s ranked-choice voting system.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The ranked-choice voting system is designed to encourage coalition-building and discourage negative campaigning.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The ranked-choice voting system is designed to encourage coalition-building and discourage negative campaigning.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The ranked-choice voting system is designed to encourage coalition-building and discourage negative campaigning.

Jun 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: This year's primary marks the second major New York City election using ranked-choice voting.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: This year's primary marks the second major New York City election using ranked-choice voting.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: This year's primary marks the second major New York City election using ranked-choice voting.

Jun 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Poll shows Mamdani surging to 52% against Cuomo's 48% in ranked-choice voting!
True

Fact Check: Poll shows Mamdani surging to 52% against Cuomo's 48% in ranked-choice voting!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Poll shows Mamdani surging to 52% against Cuomo's 48% in ranked-choice voting!

Jun 24, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Cuomo conceded despite ongoing ranked-choice vote counting.
False

Fact Check: Cuomo conceded despite ongoing ranked-choice vote counting.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Cuomo conceded despite ongoing ranked-choice vote counting.

Jun 25, 2025
Read more →