TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: The number of jobs created by FDI declined by 31% in Romania.

Fact Check: The number of jobs created by FDI declined by 31% in Romania.

Published July 3, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "The number of jobs created by FDI declined by 31% in Romania." ## What We Know The claim that the number of jobs created by Foreign Di...

Fact Check: "The number of jobs created by FDI declined by 31% in Romania."

What We Know

The claim that the number of jobs created by Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Romania declined by 31% is supported by multiple sources. According to the EY Attractiveness Survey 2025, the number of jobs created through FDI fell from 5,935 in 2023 to 4,098 in 2024, marking a significant decrease of 31%. This decline reflects a broader trend in which investments are increasingly capital-intensive and technology-driven, leading to fewer jobs being created per project. The survey highlights that while the number of FDI projects increased by 57%, the focus has shifted towards automation and innovation rather than expanding headcount.

Analysis

The evidence supporting the claim comes primarily from the EY Attractiveness Survey, which is a reputable source in the field of economic analysis and investment trends. The survey indicates a clear correlation between the increase in FDI projects and the decline in job creation, suggesting that while Romania is attracting more investment, the nature of these investments is changing. As noted in the survey, "investors grow more selective and focus on automation, innovation, and infrastructure over headcount" (EY Attractiveness Survey 2025).

Additionally, another report from Romania Insider corroborates this information, stating that the number of jobs created fell by 31% in 2024. This report also emphasizes the shift towards leaner operations, which aligns with the findings of the EY survey. The consistency across these sources strengthens the reliability of the claim.

However, it is important to consider the potential biases in these reports. The EY survey, while credible, is conducted by a consulting firm that may have an interest in portraying Romania's investment climate positively. Nonetheless, the data presented is backed by statistical analysis and reflects observable trends in the market.

Conclusion

The claim that the number of jobs created by FDI in Romania declined by 31% is True. The evidence from reputable sources, including the EY Attractiveness Survey and corroborating reports, clearly indicates a significant decrease in job creation linked to FDI, alongside an increase in the number of projects. This trend reflects a shift in investment strategies towards more capital-intensive and technology-driven initiatives.

Sources

  1. Quantcom | Vyjádření k sítím
  2. Bridging Confidence and Commitment: Romania's path to sustainable FDI ...
  3. Quantcom | Kontakt
  4. EY counts 54% more FDI projects in Romania last year, particularly in ...
  5. Podejte žádosti o vyjádření k existenci sítí
  6. EY Romania Attractiveness Survey: 58% of investors expect Romania's ...
  7. Quantcom | Podpora · Quantcom
  8. European foreign direct investment faces first decline in three years

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump fired the head of the jobs report agency due to unfavorable numbers and installed a successor expected to produce favorable data.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump fired the head of the jobs report agency due to unfavorable numbers and installed a successor expected to produce favorable data.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump fired the head of the jobs report agency due to unfavorable numbers and installed a successor expected to produce favorable data.

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Saudi Arabia executes a significant number of people for non-violent drug offenses.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Saudi Arabia executes a significant number of people for non-violent drug offenses.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Saudi Arabia executes a significant number of people for non-violent drug offenses.

Jul 9, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The budget reconciliation measure will increase the number of uninsured by 10.9 million.
True

Fact Check: The budget reconciliation measure will increase the number of uninsured by 10.9 million.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The budget reconciliation measure will increase the number of uninsured by 10.9 million.

Jul 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The number of people crossing the southern border has fallen to its lowest level in decades.
True

Fact Check: The number of people crossing the southern border has fallen to its lowest level in decades.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The number of people crossing the southern border has fallen to its lowest level in decades.

Jul 5, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The number of voters supporting a border wall has increased by 10 percentage points since 2019.
True

Fact Check: The number of voters supporting a border wall has increased by 10 percentage points since 2019.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The number of voters supporting a border wall has increased by 10 percentage points since 2019.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks