Fact Check: The Intercept y Drop Site news no deben ser tomados tan en serio porque son amarillistas y progresistas.

Fact Check: "The Intercept y Drop Site news no deben ser tomados tan en serio porque son amarillistas y progresistas."

What We Know

The claim suggests that both The Intercept and Drop Site News should not be taken seriously due to their perceived sensationalism and progressive bias.

The Intercept: Founded in 2014 by Glenn Greenwald, Jeremy Scahill, and Laura Poitras, The Intercept is characterized as a left-wing nonprofit news organization. It has been involved in significant investigative journalism, particularly regarding issues of national security and government accountability, often challenging mainstream narratives (source-1, source-3). However, it has also faced criticism for its editorial slant, which some critics label as "sensationalist" or "yellow journalism" due to its progressive stance (source-4).
Drop Site News: Established in July 2024 by former Intercept journalists Ryan Grim and Jeremy Scahill, Drop Site News focuses on investigative journalism that critiques U.S. military interventions and corporate influence (source-2, source-5). Like its predecessor, it has been described as having a progressive bias, which may influence its reporting style and content (source-5).
Media Bias Ratings: Both outlets have been rated as left-leaning by various media bias fact-checking organizations. For instance, AllSides rated The Intercept as left, and similar assessments have been made for Drop Site News (source-3, source-5).

Analysis

The assertion that these outlets should not be taken seriously due to their progressive leanings and sensationalism is partially valid but requires a nuanced understanding:

Bias and Sensationalism: While both The Intercept and Drop Site News are indeed progressive, labeling them as purely sensationalist overlooks their contributions to investigative journalism. The Intercept has won multiple awards for its reporting, particularly in areas like government accountability and civil liberties (source-1). Critics often highlight specific articles that may appear sensationalist, but this does not encompass the entirety of their output.
Credibility of Sources: The credibility of The Intercept has been questioned by some due to its funding sources and editorial decisions, particularly after significant staff departures and financial challenges (source-1). However, it still maintains a reputation for breaking important stories, particularly those involving government misconduct.
Drop Site News: As a newer outlet, Drop Site News is still establishing its reputation. Its founders have a history of serious journalism, which lends some credibility to its mission. However, as with any new media outlet, its long-term reliability and impact remain to be seen (source-2, source-5).
Public Perception: The perception of sensationalism often arises from the framing of stories. Both outlets prioritize narratives that challenge mainstream media, which can be interpreted as sensationalist by those who favor traditional reporting styles.

Conclusion

The claim that The Intercept and Drop Site News should not be taken seriously due to their sensationalism and progressive bias is Partially True. While both outlets do exhibit a left-leaning bias and have faced criticism for sensationalism, they also provide significant investigative journalism that has contributed to public discourse on important issues. Thus, while caution is warranted when consuming their content, outright dismissal may overlook their valuable contributions to journalism.

Fact Check: The Intercept y Drop Site news no deben ser tomados tan en serio porque son amarillistas y progresistas.