Fact Check: "The GOP is furious at MacDonough for enforcing Senate rules."
What We Know
Recently, Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough made several rulings that rejected key provisions in a Republican tax and immigration bill, which has led to significant backlash from GOP members. For instance, Senator Tommy Tuberville expressed his frustration on social media, suggesting that MacDonough should be fired “ASAP” for her decisions (AP News). Additionally, Representative Greg Steube criticized her role, questioning why an “unelected swamp bureaucrat” should have such authority over legislation supported by millions of voters (New York Times).
MacDonough's rulings are part of her responsibility to enforce Senate rules, particularly when legislation is being considered under special budget reconciliation procedures that limit debate and require compliance with specific fiscal guidelines. Her decisions have historically affected both parties, as she previously ruled against Democratic efforts to include a minimum wage increase in COVID-19 relief (AP News).
Analysis
The reactions from GOP members indicate a strong sentiment of anger and frustration towards MacDonough's enforcement of Senate rules. Tuberville's and Steube's comments reflect a broader sentiment among some Republicans who feel that MacDonough's rulings undermine their legislative agenda. The criticism of MacDonough is not unprecedented; her role has drawn ire from both sides of the aisle when her rulings do not align with party priorities (New York Times).
However, it is important to note that the parliamentarian's role is to provide nonpartisan advice on the Senate's rules, and her recommendations are not binding. Senators can choose to ignore her advice, but doing so could set a precedent that undermines the integrity of Senate procedures (AP News). Michael Thorning, a director at the Bipartisan Policy Center, emphasized that MacDonough is viewed as an "honest broker" and that her decisions are often respected by lawmakers, regardless of party affiliation (AP News).
The GOP's fury appears to stem from a combination of frustration over the legislative process and a desire to push through significant policy changes without the constraints imposed by Senate rules. This situation illustrates the tension between legislative goals and procedural limitations inherent in the Senate's structure.
Conclusion
The claim that "The GOP is furious at MacDonough for enforcing Senate rules" is True. The evidence shows that several Republican lawmakers have publicly expressed their anger and frustration towards MacDonough following her rulings that hindered their legislative efforts. This reaction highlights the contentious nature of the current political climate and the challenges faced by lawmakers in navigating Senate procedures.
