Fact Check: Trump and GOP Leaders Are Furious Over MacDonough's Ruling Against Their Bill
What We Know
On June 26, 2025, Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough ruled against several key provisions in a major domestic policy bill proposed by Senate Republicans, which included significant cuts to Medicaid and changes to student loan repayment options. This ruling was seen as a major setback for the GOP as they aimed to pass the legislation by a July 4 deadline set by President Trump (New York Times). Following the ruling, several Republican leaders expressed their frustration publicly. Senator Tommy Tuberville of Alabama called for MacDonough to be fired, stating that she was an "unelected bureaucrat" who should not have such power over legislation supported by millions of voters (AP News).
The ruling not only affected the current bill but also raised concerns among Senate Republicans about the viability of their legislative agenda, as they would need to either modify or completely remove the provisions struck down by MacDonough (The Hill).
Analysis
The claim that Trump and GOP leaders are furious over MacDonough's ruling is supported by multiple sources. The immediate reactions from Republican senators and representatives indicate a strong sentiment of anger and frustration. For instance, Senator Tuberville's tweet calling for MacDonough's dismissal reflects a broader discontent among GOP members regarding her authority and the implications of her rulings on their legislative efforts (AP News).
Moreover, the New York Times reported that the provisions ruled against by MacDonough could eliminate over $500 billion in intended spending cuts, which would significantly impact the GOP's fiscal strategy (New York Times). This financial aspect adds weight to the GOP's frustration, as the loss of these provisions jeopardizes their legislative goals.
While some Republican leaders, such as Senate Majority Leader John Thune, attempted to downplay the rulings by referring to them as "speed bumps," the overall tone from other GOP members suggests a more serious level of concern and anger (New York Times). The mixed responses within the party highlight the division and urgency surrounding the legislation.
Conclusion
The claim that Trump and GOP leaders are furious over MacDonough's ruling against their bill is True. The reactions from various Republican leaders demonstrate a clear sense of frustration and anger regarding the implications of the parliamentarian's decisions on their legislative agenda. The significant financial stakes involved further underscore the seriousness of their discontent.
