Fact Check: The core claim: taxpayer money funded a flood control wall in Barangay 166 built by Mayor Along Malapitan and Congressman Oca Malapitan.

Fact Check: The core claim: taxpayer money funded a flood control wall in Barangay 166 built by Mayor Along Malapitan and Congressman Oca Malapitan.

Published July 31, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact-Check: Did Taxpayer Money Fund a Flood Control Wall in Barangay 166 Built by Mayor Along Malapitan and Congressman Oca Malapitan? ## What We K...

Fact-Check: Did Taxpayer Money Fund a Flood Control Wall in Barangay 166 Built by Mayor Along Malapitan and Congressman Oca Malapitan?

What We Know

The claim states that taxpayer money funded a flood control wall in Barangay 166, built by Mayor Dale Gonzalo "Along" Malapitan and Congressman Oscar "Oca" Malapitan.

  1. Construction Project: A document detailing the construction of a flood control wall in Barangay 166 indicates that the project was executed with a total value of approximately 47.9 million PHP. This document outlines various components of the project, including earthworks and quality assurance certifications (SWA 166 Fc Wall 2ND 89).

  2. Government Involvement: The local government of Caloocan City, under Mayor Along Malapitan, has been actively involved in launching multiple infrastructure projects, including flood mitigation efforts. Reports confirm that the mayor has overseen various infrastructure initiatives aimed at improving local conditions (10 infrastructure projects inilatag ng Caloocan City government).

  3. Funding Source: The Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) has committed to enhancing flood mitigation efforts across the Philippines, which implies that taxpayer money is likely involved in funding such projects (DPWH Commits to Enhanced Flood Mitigation Efforts).

  4. Political Context: Both Mayor Along Malapitan and Congressman Oca Malapitan are prominent political figures in Caloocan City, with a history of working together on local projects (Along Malapitan - Wikipedia).

Analysis

The evidence supports the core claim that taxpayer money funded the flood control wall in Barangay 166. The project was officially documented and appears to be part of a broader initiative by the local government to address flooding issues in the area. The involvement of the DPWH suggests that the funding likely comes from public resources, which aligns with the claim that taxpayer money was used.

However, the claim does not specify the exact proportion of funding attributed to taxpayer contributions versus other potential sources, such as national government allocations or private partnerships. This lack of specificity means that while the claim is fundamentally accurate, it may oversimplify the financial dynamics involved in the project.

Moreover, the reliability of the sources varies. The construction document is a primary source that provides concrete details about the project, while news articles and Wikipedia entries may contain biases or incomplete information. The credibility of the sources is generally high, but it is essential to consider the potential for political bias, especially in articles discussing local politicians.

Conclusion

The claim that taxpayer money funded a flood control wall in Barangay 166, built by Mayor Along Malapitan and Congressman Oca Malapitan, is Partially True. While there is substantial evidence indicating that taxpayer funds were likely involved in the project, the claim lacks detail regarding the exact funding sources and proportions. Thus, while the core assertion is accurate, it does not capture the full complexity of the funding situation.

Sources

  1. DPWH Commits to Enhanced Flood Mitigation Efforts
  2. Along Malapitan - Wikipedia
  3. SWA 166 Fc Wall 2ND 89 | PDF | Metro Manila
  4. 10 infrastructure projects inilatag ng Caloocan City government
  5. CONGRESSMAN DALE “ALONG” MALAPITAN - league.ph
  6. Irony alert: Mayor Along Malapitan's flood control project billboard sinks in floods

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Karoline Leavitt <redacted_social_handle> Every month since President Trump took office, core inflation- the best measure of inflation- has beat or matched expectations. The data proves that President Trump is stabilizing inflation and the Panicans continue to be wrong about tariffs raising prices. Donald J. Trump <redacted_social_handle> Fed should cut Rates by 3 Points. Very Low Inflation. One Trillion Dollars a year would be saved!!! 429 ReTruths 1.57k Likes Jul 15, 2025, 10:08 AM
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Karoline Leavitt <redacted_social_handle> Every month since President Trump took office, core inflation- the best measure of inflation- has beat or matched expectations. The data proves that President Trump is stabilizing inflation and the Panicans continue to be wrong about tariffs raising prices. Donald J. Trump <redacted_social_handle> Fed should cut Rates by 3 Points. Very Low Inflation. One Trillion Dollars a year would be saved!!! 429 ReTruths 1.57k Likes Jul 15, 2025, 10:08 AM

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Karoline Leavitt <redacted_social_handle> Every month since President Trump took office, core inflation- the best measure of inflation- has beat or matched expectations. The data proves that President Trump is stabilizing inflation and the Panicans continue to be wrong about tariffs raising prices. Donald J. Trump <redacted_social_handle> Fed should cut Rates by 3 Points. Very Low Inflation. One Trillion Dollars a year would be saved!!! 429 ReTruths 1.57k Likes Jul 15, 2025, 10:08 AM

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Climate change around the globe does not affect the Earth's core
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Climate change around the globe does not affect the Earth's core

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Climate change around the globe does not affect the Earth's core

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Core consumer prices rose 2.9 percent compared to a year ago.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Core consumer prices rose 2.9 percent compared to a year ago.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Core consumer prices rose 2.9 percent compared to a year ago.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
911 was a false flag. For the
first 10 years, I did not think
anything other than the
official narrative then after
being shown a video, a close up
video of building number seven
coming down and that got me
going because it's obvious to
me that building seven was was
a controlled demolition because
the building collapses from the
bottom down. The trade centers
were unique in that they were
designed to withstand the
00:33
impact of a a a jet. From what
I understand the the outer
skeleton of the building. The
outer columns was like a a fish
net and you had these inner
core columns which was
substantial thick steel beams
to withstand four or five times
what the loads were. Got it.
The engineers always over
design a building. No steel
frame building has ever
collapsed before or since 9/
eleven. So that should say
something right there. And it
said that building seven it was
01:05
aggressive collapse that it was
caused by fire but progressive
collapse unlike the twin
towers, the twin towers
collapse from the top down.
That's a progressive collapse.
Sure. Floor by floor by floor.
But if you look at the videos
of building seven collapsing,
it collapses uniformly, it's
collapsing from the bottom, the
building stays intact all the
way to the bottom of the ground
and you could see the sides
caving in on it. For a building
to collapse uniformly which the
video show all the load bearing
it would have to have failed
01:36
simultaneously. Now, fire
doesn't act like that. I came
across an analogy of the twin
towers and if you could
visualize cast iron stoves
stacked. One on top of each
other. The stoves up at the
top. Yes, there's fire and
they've been damaged but the
stoves on the bottom, they
haven't been damaged. Okay. So,
the structure underneath all of
that is intact. So, it's
impossible for a building to
collapse near free fall speed
and increase. Without a
02:07
controlled demolition. You're
running into the path of most
resistance. I something else is
going on. I don't believe that
it was just the planes or the
fires I think that and they
examine the dust and they found
what they call thermitic
material which is like a
explosive incendiary which was
in the dust samples and that's
documented. There were reports
of the buildings were
undergoing a extensive elevator
renovation in the two or three
years prior to all kinds of
02:40
workers they had access to the
the core the cores of the
building and on the day of the
attack the the elevator company
would not assist in the
operations of the elevators and
the elevator company was the
elevator company it
subsequently went out of
business and a couple of years
after that
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Electronic warfare has been a core component of military strategy for decades.
True

Fact Check: Electronic warfare has been a core component of military strategy for decades.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Electronic warfare has been a core component of military strategy for decades.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Public access to land is a core value in Western U.S. culture.
Unverified

Fact Check: Public access to land is a core value in Western U.S. culture.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Public access to land is a core value in Western U.S. culture.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →