Fact Check: The agency, which accredits Tulane, did not comment.

Fact Check: "The agency, which accredits Tulane, did not comment."

What We Know

Tulane University is accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC), which is responsible for ensuring that institutions meet certain educational standards. Accreditation is critical for institutions as it affects their eligibility for federal funding and grants (Accreditation & Compliance). The university has various programs that are also accredited by specific programmatic accrediting organizations (The BSPH Degree).

In the context of accreditation, it is common for accrediting bodies to refrain from commenting on specific institutions or programs, particularly when it concerns ongoing evaluations or sensitive matters. For example, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has stated that they cannot comment on the specifics of any program's accreditation (Tulane School of Medicine placed on probation by accreditor).

Analysis

The claim that "the agency, which accredits Tulane, did not comment" appears to be a general statement about the practices of accrediting bodies. While it is true that SACSCOC and other accrediting agencies often do not provide comments on specific institutions, the lack of a direct comment from SACSCOC regarding a particular issue or inquiry is not unusual.

The reliability of the sources discussing accreditation practices is generally high, as they come from official university communications and reputable news outlets. However, it is crucial to note that the specific context of the comment (or lack thereof) is not detailed in the claim. The statement could imply a lack of transparency or accountability, which may not accurately reflect the standard operating procedures of accrediting agencies.

Moreover, the sources indicate that Tulane's accreditation was reaffirmed in 2022, with the next major review scheduled for 2028 (SACSCOC Institutional Accreditation). This timeline suggests that while the agency may not comment on every issue, they are actively engaged in the accreditation process.

Conclusion

Needs Research. The claim that "the agency, which accredits Tulane, did not comment" lacks sufficient context and specificity. While it is true that accrediting agencies often do not comment on specific cases, this is a standard practice rather than an indication of negligence or oversight. Further investigation into the specific circumstances surrounding the claim would be necessary to provide a definitive verdict.

Sources

1. Accreditation & Compliance
2. The BSPH Degree | Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine
3. CALEA Public Comment Portal | Tulane Public Safety
4. Celia Scott Weatherhead School of Public ... - Accreditation
5. SACSCOC Instiutional Accreditation
6. Substantive Change Policy
7. Tulane School of Medicine placed on probation by accreditor ...
8. Tulane School of Medicine put on probation by accrediting ...