Fact Check: The agency, which accredits Tulane, did not comment.

Fact Check: "The agency, which accredits Tulane, did not comment."

What We Know

Tulane University is accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC), which is responsible for ensuring quality assurance for degree-granting institutions. Tulane's accreditation was last reaffirmed in 2022, and the next decennial reaffirmation is scheduled for 2031-2032, with an interim report due in 2028 (SACSCOC Institutional Accreditation).

The SACSCOC is an institutional accreditor that serves as a common denominator of shared values and practices among its members, which include both U.S. and international institutions (SACSCOC Institutional Accreditation). The agency provides a structured process for institutions to demonstrate compliance with accreditation standards, which includes submitting a compliance certification report and a Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) (SACSCOC Institutional Accreditation).

Analysis

The claim that "the agency, which accredits Tulane, did not comment" lacks context and specificity. While it is true that SACSCOC does not typically provide comments on individual institutions unless there is a significant issue or inquiry, the absence of a comment does not imply a lack of oversight or concern regarding Tulane's accreditation status.

The SACSCOC operates under a framework that emphasizes institutional self-regulation and accountability. Their process includes regular reviews and the submission of reports by the accredited institutions, which suggests that they are actively engaged in monitoring compliance (SACSCOC Institutional Accreditation). Furthermore, the public can direct inquiries to SACSCOC regarding Tulane's accreditation, indicating that there is a channel for communication, even if it does not result in public comments (SACSCOC Institutional Accreditation).

The reliability of the source, SACSCOC, is high as it is a recognized accrediting body with established protocols for accreditation and compliance. However, the claim itself may stem from a misunderstanding of the accreditation process and the role of SACSCOC in public communications.

Conclusion

Needs Research. The assertion that "the agency, which accredits Tulane, did not comment" requires further investigation to clarify the context and implications of such a statement. While it is accurate that SACSCOC may not comment publicly on every institution, this does not reflect a lack of oversight or engagement. Understanding the accreditation process and the nature of communications from accrediting bodies is essential to fully evaluate this claim.

Sources

1. SACSCOC Institutional Accreditation
2. CALEA Public Comment Portal | Tulane Public Safety
3. The BSPH Degree | Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine
4. ACCREDITING ORGANIZATION PROGRAMS INITIAL ...
5. Program of Nursing Accreditation | Tulane School of Medicine
6. NAAB Accreditation - Tulane School of Architecture
7. Accredited Educator Preparation Provider
8. Accreditation & Compliance