TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence, and TruthorFake.com regularly ignores this.

Fact Check: The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence, and TruthorFake.com regularly ignores this.

Published May 30, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✗
VERDICT
Mostly False

# The Claim: "The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence, and TruthorFake.com regularly ignores this." ## Introduction The claim suggests...

The Claim: "The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence, and TruthorFake.com regularly ignores this."

Introduction

The claim suggests that TruthorFake.com, a website dedicated to fact-checking, frequently disregards the principle that the absence of evidence does not equate to evidence of absence. This principle is often invoked in discussions surrounding controversial topics where definitive proof may be lacking. The assertion raises questions about the site's methodology and its treatment of claims that lack concrete evidence.

What We Know

  1. Principle of Absence of Evidence: The phrase "the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" is a philosophical concept often used in scientific and logical discussions. It implies that just because evidence is not currently available does not mean that something does not exist or did not happen. This principle is referenced in various contexts, including discussions about cryptids and extraterrestrial life 26.

  2. TruthorFake.com’s Approach: The website has published multiple articles where it discusses claims related to public figures, including Donald Trump and Joe Biden. In these articles, the site often emphasizes the lack of direct evidence linking individuals to certain allegations, which aligns with the principle mentioned in the claim. For instance, they note that the absence of direct evidence linking Trump to Jeffrey Epstein's illegal actions complicates substantiating claims against him 39.

  3. Critique of Methodology: TruthorFake.com has been critiqued for its methodology in evaluating claims. In one instance, the site acknowledged that the absence of user reviews or expert analyses limited the robustness of its findings on a specific topic 5. This suggests that while the site may recognize the principle of absence of evidence, it may not always apply it consistently across all claims.

Analysis

The claim that TruthorFake.com "regularly ignores" the principle of absence of evidence requires a nuanced examination of the site's content and methodology:

  • Source Reliability: TruthorFake.com presents itself as a fact-checking entity, which generally lends it credibility. However, the reliability of its assessments can vary based on the sources it cites. For example, in discussing the absence of evidence regarding cryptids, the site references paleontologist Donald Prothero, who is a credible source in the field of paleontology 2. However, the site's overall approach may be influenced by its editorial stance, which could introduce bias.

  • Potential Bias: The site appears to focus on high-profile political figures and controversial claims, which may lead to selective reporting. For instance, while it emphasizes the absence of evidence in claims against Trump and Biden, it does not always explore the broader context of these claims, such as the motivations behind them or the implications of their absence 39. This selective focus could be interpreted as a form of bias.

  • Conflicts of Interest: It is important to consider whether TruthorFake.com has any affiliations or sponsorships that might influence its reporting. A lack of transparency regarding funding or affiliations could raise questions about potential conflicts of interest.

  • Need for Additional Information: To fully assess the claim, it would be beneficial to have a comprehensive analysis of TruthorFake.com's articles over time, examining how frequently the site invokes the principle of absence of evidence and in what contexts. A comparative analysis with other fact-checking organizations could also provide insights into its methodology and reliability.

Conclusion

Verdict: Mostly False

The claim that TruthorFake.com "regularly ignores" the principle that the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence is deemed mostly false based on the available evidence. While the site does emphasize the lack of direct evidence in various claims, it has also faced criticism for inconsistencies in its methodology and potential biases in its reporting. The site acknowledges the principle in some contexts but does not consistently apply it across all claims, which raises questions about its overall reliability.

It is important to recognize that the evaluation of TruthorFake.com's adherence to this principle is limited by the scope of available articles and the subjective nature of bias in fact-checking. A more comprehensive analysis of its content over time would be necessary to draw firmer conclusions. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider multiple sources when assessing claims related to fact-checking and evidence.

Sources

  1. Fact Check: Donald Trump is a Russian asset named 'Agent Krasnov'. (https://truthorfake.com/blog/donald-trump-is-a-russian-asset-named-a-667)
  2. Fact Check: Is there any evidence of cryptids? | TruthOrFake Blog (https://truthorfake.com/blog/is-there-any-evidence-of-cryptids-945)
  3. Fact Check: Trump is on the Epstein list | TruthOrFake Blog (https://truthorfake.com/blog/trump-is-on-the-epstein-list-1247)
  4. Fact Check: TRUMPS MOM SAID THEY BETTER NOT LET HIM ... (https://truthorfake.com/blog/trumps-mom-said-they-better-not-let-him-3225)
  5. Fact Check: Is GD Acortador? | TruthOrFake Blog (https://truthorfake.com/blog/is-gd-acortador-13318)
  6. Fact Check: There was never any life on Mars - TruthOrFake (https://truthorfake.com/blog/there-was-never-any-life-on-mars-otgwjl)
  7. Fact Check: is it true that the hacker team anonymous has evidence that ... (https://truthorfake.com/blog/is-it-true-that-the-hacker-team-anonymou-3158)
  8. There are no credible sources that substantiate claims ... - TruthOrFake (https://truthorfake.com/blog/what-we-know-plagiarism-recent-reports-3250)
  9. Fact Check: Joe Biden is corrupt | TruthOrFake Blog (https://truthorfake.com/blog/joe-biden-is-corrupt-2082)
  10. Fact Check: you failed to find the correct source. you suck (https://truthorfake.com/blog/you-failed-to-find-the-correct-source-y-4035)

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, warns Sagan.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, warns Sagan.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, warns Sagan.

Jun 28, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: What We Know Plagiarism: Recent reports indicate that Mark Carney has been accused of plagiarism in his 1995 PhD thesis from Oxford University, with claims of ten instances of apparent plagiarism identified by academics reviewing the material 89. Tax Evasion and Creative Accounting: There are no credible sources that substantiate claims of tax evasion or creative accounting related to Carney. These allegations appear to be unverified assertions without supporting evidence. Abusing Tenants and Union Busting: There is currently no reliable information or credible sources that confirm these claims against Carney. These assertions seem to lack a factual basis and may require further investigation. Moving Headquarters: Carney's professional history includes significant roles in both Canada and the U.S., but specific claims about moving a headquarters are vague and not substantiated by credible evidence. Denying Insurance Claims to Coal Miners: This claim is not supported by any verified sources. Further context or evidence would be necessary to evaluate its validity. Loans from Chinese State-Owned Banks: There are no verified reports or credible sources that confirm Carney has taken loans from Chinese state-owned banks. Advisor to Justin Trudeau: Carney did serve as an informal advisor to Prime Minister Trudeau during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly on economic responses 37. Analysis The claims made against Mark Carney vary significantly in their credibility. The plagiarism allegations are backed by recent investigative journalism, notably from sources like The Independent and the National Post, which have reported on the findings of academics who reviewed Carney's thesis 89. These sources are generally considered reliable, although the National Post has been criticized for a conservative bias, which could influence the framing of the story. In contrast, the other allegations—such as tax evasion, union busting, and denying insurance claims—lack credible sources and appear to be unverified assertions. The absence of evidence or reliable reporting on these points raises questions about their validity. The claims about moving headquarters and loans from Chinese banks are particularly vague and lack any substantiation. Without specific details or credible sources, these assertions remain unverified and should be treated with skepticism. The context of these claims is also essential. Carney's recent political ascent, including his candidacy for Prime Minister, may have prompted opponents to scrutinize his past more closely, potentially leading to exaggerated or unfounded claims aimed at undermining his credibility.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: What We Know Plagiarism: Recent reports indicate that Mark Carney has been accused of plagiarism in his 1995 PhD thesis from Oxford University, with claims of ten instances of apparent plagiarism identified by academics reviewing the material 89. Tax Evasion and Creative Accounting: There are no credible sources that substantiate claims of tax evasion or creative accounting related to Carney. These allegations appear to be unverified assertions without supporting evidence. Abusing Tenants and Union Busting: There is currently no reliable information or credible sources that confirm these claims against Carney. These assertions seem to lack a factual basis and may require further investigation. Moving Headquarters: Carney's professional history includes significant roles in both Canada and the U.S., but specific claims about moving a headquarters are vague and not substantiated by credible evidence. Denying Insurance Claims to Coal Miners: This claim is not supported by any verified sources. Further context or evidence would be necessary to evaluate its validity. Loans from Chinese State-Owned Banks: There are no verified reports or credible sources that confirm Carney has taken loans from Chinese state-owned banks. Advisor to Justin Trudeau: Carney did serve as an informal advisor to Prime Minister Trudeau during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly on economic responses 37. Analysis The claims made against Mark Carney vary significantly in their credibility. The plagiarism allegations are backed by recent investigative journalism, notably from sources like The Independent and the National Post, which have reported on the findings of academics who reviewed Carney's thesis 89. These sources are generally considered reliable, although the National Post has been criticized for a conservative bias, which could influence the framing of the story. In contrast, the other allegations—such as tax evasion, union busting, and denying insurance claims—lack credible sources and appear to be unverified assertions. The absence of evidence or reliable reporting on these points raises questions about their validity. The claims about moving headquarters and loans from Chinese banks are particularly vague and lack any substantiation. Without specific details or credible sources, these assertions remain unverified and should be treated with skepticism. The context of these claims is also essential. Carney's recent political ascent, including his candidacy for Prime Minister, may have prompted opponents to scrutinize his past more closely, potentially leading to exaggerated or unfounded claims aimed at undermining his credibility.

Apr 2, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: What We Know Plagiarism: Recent reports indicate that Mark Carney has been accused of plagiarism in his 1995 PhD thesis from Oxford University, with claims of ten instances of apparent plagiarism identified by academics reviewing the material 89. Tax Evasion and Creative Accounting: There are no credible sources that substantiate claims of tax evasion or creative accounting related to Carney. These allegations appear to be unverified assertions without supporting evidence. Abusing Tenants and Union Busting: There is currently no reliable information or credible sources that confirm these claims against Carney. These assertions seem to lack a factual basis and may require further investigation. Moving Headquarters: Carney's professional history includes significant roles in both Canada and the U.S., but specific claims about moving a headquarters are vague and not substantiated by credible evidence. Denying Insurance Claims to Coal Miners: This claim is not supported by any verified sources. Further context or evidence would be necessary to evaluate its validity. Loans from Chinese State-Owned Banks: There are no verified reports or credible sources that confirm Carney has taken loans from Chinese state-owned banks. Advisor to Justin Trudeau: Carney did serve as an informal advisor to Prime Minister Trudeau during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly on economic responses 37. Analysis The claims made against Mark Carney vary significantly in their credibility. The plagiarism allegations are backed by recent investigative journalism, notably from sources like The Independent and the National Post, which have reported on the findings of academics who reviewed Carney's thesis 89. These sources are generally considered reliable, although the National Post has been criticized for a conservative bias, which could influence the framing of the story. In contrast, the other allegations—such as tax evasion, union busting, and denying insurance claims—lack credible sources and appear to be unverified assertions. The absence of evidence or reliable reporting on these points raises questions about their validity. The claims about moving headquarters and loans from Chinese banks are particularly vague and lack any substantiation. Without specific details or credible sources, these assertions remain unverified and should be treated with skepticism. The context of these claims is also essential. Carney's recent political ascent, including his candidacy for Prime Minister, may have prompted opponents to scrutinize his past more closely, potentially leading to exaggerated or unfounded claims aimed at undermining his credibility.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: What We Know Plagiarism: Recent reports indicate that Mark Carney has been accused of plagiarism in his 1995 PhD thesis from Oxford University, with claims of ten instances of apparent plagiarism identified by academics reviewing the material 89. Tax Evasion and Creative Accounting: There are no credible sources that substantiate claims of tax evasion or creative accounting related to Carney. These allegations appear to be unverified assertions without supporting evidence. Abusing Tenants and Union Busting: There is currently no reliable information or credible sources that confirm these claims against Carney. These assertions seem to lack a factual basis and may require further investigation. Moving Headquarters: Carney's professional history includes significant roles in both Canada and the U.S., but specific claims about moving a headquarters are vague and not substantiated by credible evidence. Denying Insurance Claims to Coal Miners: This claim is not supported by any verified sources. Further context or evidence would be necessary to evaluate its validity. Loans from Chinese State-Owned Banks: There are no verified reports or credible sources that confirm Carney has taken loans from Chinese state-owned banks. Advisor to Justin Trudeau: Carney did serve as an informal advisor to Prime Minister Trudeau during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly on economic responses 37. Analysis The claims made against Mark Carney vary significantly in their credibility. The plagiarism allegations are backed by recent investigative journalism, notably from sources like The Independent and the National Post, which have reported on the findings of academics who reviewed Carney's thesis 89. These sources are generally considered reliable, although the National Post has been criticized for a conservative bias, which could influence the framing of the story. In contrast, the other allegations—such as tax evasion, union busting, and denying insurance claims—lack credible sources and appear to be unverified assertions. The absence of evidence or reliable reporting on these points raises questions about their validity. The claims about moving headquarters and loans from Chinese banks are particularly vague and lack any substantiation. Without specific details or credible sources, these assertions remain unverified and should be treated with skepticism. The context of these claims is also essential. Carney's recent political ascent, including his candidacy for Prime Minister, may have prompted opponents to scrutinize his past more closely, potentially leading to exaggerated or unfounded claims aimed at undermining his credibility.

Apr 2, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Dear Ms. Clay, Thank you for reaching out to inquire about these important questions—it's always encouraging to hear from residents who take an active interest in the health and infrastructure safety of our community. 1. Fluoride in Tombstone Water: • Tombstone does not add fluoride to its municipal water supply. • Testing results show fluoride levels well under federal safety limits, averaging around 0.3 to 0.34 ppm, far below the EPA's maximum of 4 ppm. • The EPA’s Safe Drinking Water System database confirms no fluoride violations for our system in the past decade (EWG, EWG). 2. EMFs from Cell Towers: • Any cell towers in our area are required to meet FCC limits for EMF emissions, well below levels regarded as harmful. • Although some residents worry about long-term exposure, there is no credible evidence that FCC-compliant towers pose health risks. 3. Upcoming Treatment Plant Tour: • The City is organizing a guided tour of the Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants next week and we’d be pleased to have you join once the date is finalized. If you'd like to keep on top of the water quality reports, you can visit the City’s Annual Drinking Water Quality Report page here: 🔗 https://cityoftombstoneaz.gov/public-works-department/ Please feel free to let me know if you'd like a spot on the plant tour. I’ll send details once it’s scheduled.
True

Fact Check: Dear Ms. Clay, Thank you for reaching out to inquire about these important questions—it's always encouraging to hear from residents who take an active interest in the health and infrastructure safety of our community. 1. Fluoride in Tombstone Water: • Tombstone does not add fluoride to its municipal water supply. • Testing results show fluoride levels well under federal safety limits, averaging around 0.3 to 0.34 ppm, far below the EPA's maximum of 4 ppm. • The EPA’s Safe Drinking Water System database confirms no fluoride violations for our system in the past decade (EWG, EWG). 2. EMFs from Cell Towers: • Any cell towers in our area are required to meet FCC limits for EMF emissions, well below levels regarded as harmful. • Although some residents worry about long-term exposure, there is no credible evidence that FCC-compliant towers pose health risks. 3. Upcoming Treatment Plant Tour: • The City is organizing a guided tour of the Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants next week and we’d be pleased to have you join once the date is finalized. If you'd like to keep on top of the water quality reports, you can visit the City’s Annual Drinking Water Quality Report page here: 🔗 https://cityoftombstoneaz.gov/public-works-department/ Please feel free to let me know if you'd like a spot on the plant tour. I’ll send details once it’s scheduled.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Dear Ms. Clay, Thank you for reaching out to inquire about these important questions—it's always encouraging to hear from residents who take an active interest in the health and infrastructure safety of our community. 1. Fluoride in Tombstone Water: • Tombstone does not add fluoride to its municipal water supply. • Testing results show fluoride levels well under federal safety limits, averaging around 0.3 to 0.34 ppm, far below the EPA's maximum of 4 ppm. • The EPA’s Safe Drinking Water System database confirms no fluoride violations for our system in the past decade (EWG, EWG). 2. EMFs from Cell Towers: • Any cell towers in our area are required to meet FCC limits for EMF emissions, well below levels regarded as harmful. • Although some residents worry about long-term exposure, there is no credible evidence that FCC-compliant towers pose health risks. 3. Upcoming Treatment Plant Tour: • The City is organizing a guided tour of the Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants next week and we’d be pleased to have you join once the date is finalized. If you'd like to keep on top of the water quality reports, you can visit the City’s Annual Drinking Water Quality Report page here: 🔗 https://cityoftombstoneaz.gov/public-works-department/ Please feel free to let me know if you'd like a spot on the plant tour. I’ll send details once it’s scheduled.

Jul 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: There are high-level DNC Emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's quote psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness and that then Secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers
True

Fact Check: There are high-level DNC Emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's quote psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness and that then Secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers

Detailed fact-check analysis of: There are high-level DNC Emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's quote psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness and that then Secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers

Aug 3, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence, and TruthorFake.com regularly ignores this. | TruthOrFake Blog