TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: you failed to find the correct source. you suck

Fact Check: you failed to find the correct source. you suck

Published April 9, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
?
VERDICT
Unverified

# The Claim: "You failed to find the correct source. You suck" ## 1. Introduction The claim "you failed to find the correct source. you suck" appears...

The Claim: "You failed to find the correct source. You suck"

1. Introduction

The claim "you failed to find the correct source. you suck" appears to be a critical remark directed at someone's research or citation efforts. This statement raises questions about the reliability of sources used in verifying quotes, as well as the broader implications of misattribution in academic and public discourse. The context of this claim is essential for understanding its validity and the potential consequences of failing to accurately source quotations.

2. What We Know

Accurate sourcing of quotations is a significant aspect of research and writing. Misattributed or distorted quotes can lead to misinformation and undermine the credibility of arguments. Various resources exist to assist individuals in verifying quotations:

  • Library Guides: Many libraries, such as Duke University and the University of Denver, provide guides on how to find and verify quotations, emphasizing the importance of locating original sources to avoid misattributions 135.
  • Online Tools: Websites like Quote Investigator and Wikiquote aim to trace the origins of quotes, although the reliability of these sources can vary 58.
  • Research Techniques: Effective methods for finding quotes include using specific keywords, searching for variations of the quote, and consulting expert resources like librarians 267.

3. Analysis

The claim itself lacks specificity regarding the context in which the source was supposedly misidentified. This ambiguity makes it challenging to evaluate the validity of the assertion.

Source Evaluation

  • Credibility: The sources cited for finding quotations, such as library guides and educational institutions, generally have high credibility. They are often authored by professionals in the field of information science or librarianship, which lends authority to their recommendations 123456.
  • Bias and Reliability: While many of these sources are reliable, they may not cover all possible nuances of quotation verification. For instance, some online platforms that aggregate quotes may not prioritize accuracy, leading to the propagation of misattributed quotes 8. This highlights the need for critical evaluation of any source used in research.
  • Methodology: The methodologies suggested for verifying quotes often involve searching through multiple databases and cross-referencing information. However, the effectiveness of these methods can depend on the user's familiarity with the tools and the specificity of the quote being investigated. A lack of detailed context or wording can complicate the search process 7.

Conflicts of Interest

Some sources, particularly those that aggregate quotes for commercial purposes, may have conflicts of interest. They may prioritize user engagement over accuracy, potentially leading to the dissemination of incorrect information 8.

4. Conclusion

Verdict: Unverified

The claim that someone "failed to find the correct source" remains unverified due to a lack of specific context and details regarding the quote in question. While credible sources exist to assist in verifying quotations, the ambiguity surrounding the claim makes it difficult to ascertain its validity. The absence of a specific quote or context limits the ability to evaluate the accuracy of the attribution, leading to uncertainty.

It is important to note that while many resources for verifying quotes are reliable, they are not infallible. The methodologies suggested for quote verification can vary in effectiveness based on the user's experience and the specificity of the information sought. Additionally, potential biases in some online platforms may further complicate the verification process.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider the context in which claims are made. The lack of definitive evidence in this case underscores the importance of thorough research and the need for clarity in discussions about source attribution.

5. Sources

  1. Duke University. "Who said that? Librarian tips for verifying quotes." Duke University
  2. Valley City State University. "Quotations - How To Find..." Valley City State University
  3. University of Denver. "Home - Finding Quotations." University of Denver
  4. Library of Congress. "Research Guides: Finding Quotations." Library of Congress
  5. Duke University. "Finding Quotes - Literature in English." Duke University
  6. Library of Congress. "Introduction - Finding Quotations." Library of Congress
  7. New York Public Library. "How to Research a Quotation." New York Public Library
  8. Kristen Stieffel. "Verify the Sources of Your Quotations." Kristen Stieffel
  9. Spotify. "Failure is Not Proof that You Suck - Never Settle Podcast." Spotify
  10. TV Tropes. "Best Quotes for 'The Reason You Suck' Speech." TV Tropes

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: So now I may expose everything they love hiding from customers. First, half of the security cameras at Walmart are literally fake. I saw someone open one up and it was literally just a plastic shell. They're just there to scare you. Alright, they be hiding this but y'all really can get a seven hundred dollar Walmart gift card. If you sign up at 700 WM. com, everyone is qualified for this and I still do this every month since I'm a single mom. Next, if you find something in Walmart that's already been open or with ripped packaging, you can ask for a discount and we have to give it to you. Okay now if you comment Walmart in the comments 00:32 I'll send you a little bonus
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: So now I may expose everything they love hiding from customers. First, half of the security cameras at Walmart are literally fake. I saw someone open one up and it was literally just a plastic shell. They're just there to scare you. Alright, they be hiding this but y'all really can get a seven hundred dollar Walmart gift card. If you sign up at 700 WM. com, everyone is qualified for this and I still do this every month since I'm a single mom. Next, if you find something in Walmart that's already been open or with ripped packaging, you can ask for a discount and we have to give it to you. Okay now if you comment Walmart in the comments 00:32 I'll send you a little bonus

Detailed fact-check analysis of: So now I may expose everything they love hiding from customers. First, half of the security cameras at Walmart are literally fake. I saw someone open one up and it was literally just a plastic shell. They're just there to scare you. Alright, they be hiding this but y'all really can get a seven hundred dollar Walmart gift card. If you sign up at 700 WM. com, everyone is qualified for this and I still do this every month since I'm a single mom. Next, if you find something in Walmart that's already been open or with ripped packaging, you can ask for a discount and we have to give it to you. Okay now if you comment Walmart in the comments 00:32 I'll send you a little bonus

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: you failed to find the correct source. you suck | TruthOrFake Blog