Fact Check: Texts proved fox reporters didn't believe election fraud claims

Fact Check: Texts proved fox reporters didn't believe election fraud claims

Published July 22, 2025
by TruthOrFake AI
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Texts proved fox reporters didn't believe election fraud claims" ## What We Know Following the 2020 U.S. presidential election, Fox Ne...

Fact Check: "Texts proved fox reporters didn't believe election fraud claims"

What We Know

Following the 2020 U.S. presidential election, Fox News faced significant scrutiny over its coverage of election fraud claims. A series of legal filings, particularly from Dominion Voting Systems, revealed that many Fox News hosts and executives privately expressed disbelief in the very allegations they were broadcasting. For instance, Tucker Carlson referred to the claims as "absurd" in private messages, while Laura Ingraham described Sidney Powell, a key proponent of the fraud claims, as "a bit nuts" (source-2, source-3).

Moreover, a memo shared by Powell, which contained outlandish claims about election fraud, was described by its author as "pretty wackadoodle" (source-2). This memo was pivotal in the discussions among Fox News personalities, who were concerned about the network's ratings and viewer loyalty following its early call for Joe Biden in Arizona (source-3).

Analysis

The evidence presented in the Dominion lawsuit against Fox News is substantial and reveals a stark contrast between the network's public stance and private beliefs. The private communications among Fox News personalities indicate a clear skepticism about the validity of the election fraud claims. For example, Carlson's private messages included derogatory remarks about the claims, while Hannity openly stated in a deposition that he did not believe the narrative pushed by Powell (source-3, source-6).

The credibility of the sources involved in these revelations is bolstered by the legal context; the information comes from sworn depositions and legal filings, which carry a weight of accountability. Furthermore, the media outlets reporting on these findings, such as NPR and PBS, are established news organizations known for their investigative journalism, which adds to the reliability of the information presented (source-2, source-6).

However, it is essential to note that Fox News has publicly denied the allegations made by Dominion, claiming that the lawsuit mischaracterizes the network's actions and statements (source-3). This defense, while part of their legal strategy, does not negate the documented private sentiments of their hosts.

Conclusion

The claim that "Texts proved fox reporters didn't believe election fraud claims" is True. The evidence from Dominion's legal filings and the subsequent reporting indicates that many Fox News personalities privately dismissed the election fraud claims as baseless while continuing to promote them on air. This contradiction highlights a significant ethical concern regarding journalistic integrity and the responsibility of media outlets to provide accurate information to their audience.

Sources

  1. Fox Stars Privately Expressed Disbelief About Election Fraud Claims
  2. The 'wackadoodle' foundation of Fox News' election-fraud claims
  3. Off the air, Fox News stars blasted the election fraud claims
  4. Defamation suit produced trove of Tucker Carlson messages
  5. Dominion Voting Systems v. Fox News Network
  6. Lawsuit filing shows Fox hosts didn't believe election fraud lies they pushed on TV
  7. Five Bombshells in Tucker Carlson's Texts About Election
  8. What Fox News hosts allegedly said privately versus on-air

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...