Fact Check: Texts proved a fox reporter didn't believe election fraud claims and did not like trump

Fact Check: Texts proved a fox reporter didn't believe election fraud claims and did not like trump

Published July 22, 2025
by TruthOrFake AI
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Texts proved a fox reporter didn't believe election fraud claims and did not like Trump" ## What We Know Recent legal filings from Dom...

Fact Check: "Texts proved a fox reporter didn't believe election fraud claims and did not like Trump"

What We Know

Recent legal filings from Dominion Voting Systems have revealed that several prominent Fox News personalities, including Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, and Laura Ingraham, privately expressed skepticism about the election fraud claims made by former President Donald Trump and his allies. In text messages, Carlson referred to Trump attorney Sidney Powell as "lying" and "insane," while Ingraham described Powell as "a complete nut" and noted that "no one will work with her" (New York Times, NPR). Furthermore, Rupert Murdoch, chairman of Fox Corporation, characterized Trump's claims as "really crazy stuff" (New York Times).

The internal communications also revealed that Fox executives were concerned about the potential backlash from their audience after the network accurately called Arizona for Biden on election night. This decision reportedly led to a significant drop in ratings, prompting Fox hosts to promote unfounded claims of widespread voter fraud to retain their viewership (NPR, Washington Post).

Analysis

The evidence presented in the Dominion lawsuit paints a clear picture of Fox News personalities and executives expressing disbelief in the very claims they were broadcasting. The text messages and internal communications serve as critical evidence, demonstrating that key figures at Fox were aware of the lack of credibility behind the election fraud allegations. For instance, Carlson's text messages indicate that he was more concerned about the network's ratings than the truth of the claims being made (AP News, Newsweek).

The reliability of these sources is bolstered by the fact that they are based on legal filings, which typically undergo scrutiny and require a degree of factual accuracy. Furthermore, the context of these communications—taking place during a high-stakes election and subsequent legal challenges—adds weight to their significance. Critics of Fox News have pointed out that the network's actions reflect a broader trend of prioritizing audience retention over journalistic integrity (PBS, CNN).

Conclusion

The claim that texts proved a Fox reporter did not believe in election fraud claims and did not like Trump is True. The internal communications from Fox News personalities reveal a clear disconnect between their private beliefs and public statements. This discrepancy highlights a troubling aspect of media ethics, where the pursuit of ratings and audience loyalty can overshadow factual reporting.

Sources

  1. Fox Stars Privately Expressed Disbelief About Election ...
  2. Off the air, Fox News stars blasted the election fraud claims ...
  3. Defamation suit produced trove of Tucker Carlson messages
  4. Fox News bosses scolded reporters who challenged false ...
  5. The 'wackadoodle' foundation of Fox News' election-fraud ...
  6. Five Bombshells in Tucker Carlson's Texts About Election
  7. Lawsuit filing shows Fox hosts didn't believe election fraud ...
  8. Fox News stars and executives privately trashed Trump's ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

Fact Check: Texts proved a fox reporter didn't believe election fraud claims and did not like trump | TruthOrFake Blog