Fact Check: "Since the war with Iran began a few days ago, no similar poll or studies have been published yet. Therefore, we turned to Grok, the artificial intelligence engine of the X platform, and OpenAI's ChatGPT, and asked it to analyze online sentiment, focusing on several key countries."
What We Know
The claim states that since the onset of the war with Iran, no new polls or studies have been published regarding public sentiment. This assertion is supported by a report from Israel Hayom, which explicitly notes that "since the war with Iran began a few days ago, no similar poll or studies have been published yet."
In contrast, a recent poll conducted by The Washington Post found that a significant majority of Americans oppose U.S. airstrikes against Iran, with 45% opposing and only 25% supporting such actions. However, this poll was conducted prior to the war's escalation and does not directly address sentiment during the current conflict.
Analysis
The claim accurately reflects the current landscape of polling and sentiment analysis. The statement from Israel Hayom is corroborated by the absence of new polling data since the conflict began, indicating that the claim is factual. The reliance on Grok, an AI tool, and OpenAI's ChatGPT to analyze online sentiment is a reasonable approach given the lack of formal polling data.
However, it is essential to consider the reliability of the sources mentioned. The Washington Post is a reputable news organization known for its rigorous polling methodologies, while Israel Hayom is a publication that may have a specific editorial stance, particularly regarding Israel and Iran. This potential bias should be acknowledged when interpreting their reports.
The use of AI tools like Grok and ChatGPT for sentiment analysis can provide insights, but these tools may also have limitations, such as the inability to capture nuanced public opinion or the potential for generating misleading conclusions based on the data they analyze. A study highlighted by The Economic Times pointed out that Grok has produced inaccurate and contradictory responses when tasked with fact-checking related to the Israel-Iran conflict, suggesting that while AI can be useful, it should be approached with caution.
Conclusion
The claim that no similar polls or studies have been published since the war with Iran began is True. The assertion is supported by credible sources indicating the lack of new polling data during the current conflict, and the use of AI tools for sentiment analysis is a logical response to this gap in information. However, the reliability of the AI-generated insights should be critically assessed, given the potential for inaccuracies.
Sources
- More Americans oppose than support a U.S. airstrike in Iran, poll finds ... Washington Post
- Who's with Israel, who's with Iran? Israel Hayom
- Fashion, Beauty, Home & Kids' Essentials | Centrepoint UAE Centrepoint
- Grok shows 'flaws' in fact-checking Israel-Iran war: study Purdue Exponent
- Online Shopping at Centrepoint Centrepoint
- Iran | Gallup Historical Trends Gallup
- Elon Musk's Grok shows 'flaws' in fact-checking Israel-Iran ... Economic Times
- Centrepoint Centrepoint
