TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Shipping times could increase by 15-20 days due to Hormuz disruptions.

Fact Check: Shipping times could increase by 15-20 days due to Hormuz disruptions.

Published June 22, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "Shipping times could increase by 15-20 days due to Hormuz disruptions." ## What We Know The Strait of Hormuz is a critical maritime ch...

Fact Check: "Shipping times could increase by 15-20 days due to Hormuz disruptions."

What We Know

The Strait of Hormuz is a critical maritime chokepoint through which approximately 20% of global oil supplies transit. In 2024, oil flow through this strait averaged around 20 million barrels per day, making it vital for global energy security (EIA). Recent geopolitical tensions, particularly involving Iran, have raised concerns about potential disruptions in shipping through this route.

Analysts have indicated that any significant disruption in the Strait of Hormuz could lead to substantial delays and increased shipping costs. For instance, a report from Citigroup projected that a full closure of the strait could spike oil prices significantly, with disruptions potentially affecting around 3 million barrels per day (Gulf News). Furthermore, while tanker traffic has remained stable, there are signs of increased caution among shipping companies, leading to elevated freight rates (Reuters).

Analysis

The claim that shipping times could increase by 15-20 days due to disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz is plausible but requires careful consideration of the context. The Strait is indeed a critical chokepoint, and any disruptions can lead to increased shipping times. However, the extent of the delay (15-20 days) is not universally agreed upon and may vary based on specific circumstances.

While some reports suggest that shipping disruptions are already occurring, with increased freight rates and rerouting of tankers, the actual increase in shipping time can depend on various factors, including the nature of the disruption and the availability of alternative routes (Times of Israel, New Age).

Alternative pipelines exist that can bypass the Strait of Hormuz, such as Saudi Arabia's East-West pipeline, which can mitigate some of the disruptions. However, these alternatives do not operate at full capacity and may not be sufficient to handle all the oil that typically transits through the strait (EIA).

In summary, while the potential for increased shipping times exists, the specific claim of a 15-20 day increase lacks definitive evidence and may be an overestimation based on current data.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True
The claim that shipping times could increase by 15-20 days due to disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz is partially true. While disruptions in this critical chokepoint can lead to increased shipping times and costs, the specific duration of 15-20 days is not substantiated by current evidence and may vary based on the situation. The geopolitical landscape is fluid, and while the risk of delays is real, the exact impact remains uncertain.

Sources

  1. Amid regional conflict, the Strait of Hormuz remains critical ... EIA
  2. Middle East conflict slows tanker bookings, lifts rates Reuters
  3. Shipping disruption surges around Hormuz amid ... - The Times of Israel Times of Israel
  4. Iran's Strait of Hormuz closure threat raises stakes for global energy ... Gulf News
  5. leboncoin, site de petites annonces gratuites leboncoin
  6. Toute la France - leboncoin leboncoin
  7. Businesses fear trade disruption New Age

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz could spike shipping costs by 40-50%.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz could spike shipping costs by 40-50%.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz could spike shipping costs by 40-50%.

Jun 22, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: All detected text: trump posted PSAs, total BREAKING We have just IMPORTANT WIN in our Historic Lawsuit against Minutes, and Paramount. like C and George Slopadopoulos, Corporate Owners knew that they defrauded the American People, and desperate settle. Minutes have today paid and we also anticipate receiving Million Dollars more from the new Owners, similar Programming, over Million Dollars. This another long VICTORIES Fake News Media, who holding account for their widespread fraud and deceit. Wall Street Journal, The Failing New York Times, The Washington Post, MSDNC, CNN, other Mainstream Media Liars, NOTICE that the days them being allowed the American People are GREAT AGAIN!
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: All detected text: trump posted PSAs, total BREAKING We have just IMPORTANT WIN in our Historic Lawsuit against Minutes, and Paramount. like C and George Slopadopoulos, Corporate Owners knew that they defrauded the American People, and desperate settle. Minutes have today paid and we also anticipate receiving Million Dollars more from the new Owners, similar Programming, over Million Dollars. This another long VICTORIES Fake News Media, who holding account for their widespread fraud and deceit. Wall Street Journal, The Failing New York Times, The Washington Post, MSDNC, CNN, other Mainstream Media Liars, NOTICE that the days them being allowed the American People are GREAT AGAIN!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: All detected text: trump posted PSAs, total BREAKING We have just IMPORTANT WIN in our Historic Lawsuit against Minutes, and Paramount. like C and George Slopadopoulos, Corporate Owners knew that they defrauded the American People, and desperate settle. Minutes have today paid and we also anticipate receiving Million Dollars more from the new Owners, similar Programming, over Million Dollars. This another long VICTORIES Fake News Media, who holding account for their widespread fraud and deceit. Wall Street Journal, The Failing New York Times, The Washington Post, MSDNC, CNN, other Mainstream Media Liars, NOTICE that the days them being allowed the American People are GREAT AGAIN!

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Shipping through Hormuz could be disrupted for weeks or months.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Shipping through Hormuz could be disrupted for weeks or months.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Shipping through Hormuz could be disrupted for weeks or months.

Jun 22, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Strait of Hormuz is a critical global oil shipping route.
Unverified

Fact Check: The Strait of Hormuz is a critical global oil shipping route.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Strait of Hormuz is a critical global oil shipping route.

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Shipping rate spread skyrockets from 50 to 1,101 in just 40 days.
Needs Research

Fact Check: Shipping rate spread skyrockets from 50 to 1,101 in just 40 days.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Shipping rate spread skyrockets from 50 to 1,101 in just 40 days.

Jun 23, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks