Fact Check: Senate's version adds $500 billion more debt than House's!

Fact Check: Senate's version adds $500 billion more debt than House's!

Published June 29, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Senate's version adds $500 billion more debt than House's!" ## What We Know The claim that the Senate's version of the "One Big Beauti...

Fact Check: "Senate's version adds $500 billion more debt than House's!"

What We Know

The claim that the Senate's version of the "One Big Beautiful Bill" adds $500 billion more debt than the House's version is supported by multiple sources. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Senate bill is projected to add at least $3.3 trillion to the national debt over a decade, while the House version is estimated to add approximately $2.4 trillion. This indicates a difference of about $900 billion between the two bills. However, some analyses suggest that the Senate bill could add even more to the debt when considering additional borrowing costs, potentially pushing the total closer to $4 trillion.

Furthermore, a report from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget indicates that the Senate bill likely violates House budget instructions by at least $500 billion, reinforcing the claim that the Senate's version incurs significantly more debt than the House's version (CRFB).

Analysis

The evidence presented shows a clear discrepancy between the projected costs of the House and Senate versions of the bill. The CBO's estimate of $3.3 trillion for the Senate bill compared to $2.4 trillion for the House bill suggests a substantial increase in debt. The difference of $900 billion is significant, but the claim specifically states an increase of $500 billion more debt, which aligns with the findings from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. This organization has a reputation for providing nonpartisan analyses of fiscal policy, which adds credibility to their findings.

Moreover, the Senate's approach to budget costs, which includes making certain tax cuts permanent without accounting for their full cost, has been criticized by some fiscal conservatives. This alternative accounting method could lead to underestimating the true impact on the debt, further complicating the financial implications of the Senate's version of the bill (New York Times).

While both the CBO and the CRFB are reputable sources, it is important to note that the CBO's estimates are based on the current legislative text and assumptions about future economic conditions, which can change. Therefore, while the estimates are reliable, they are subject to revision as new information becomes available.

Conclusion

Verdict: True. The claim that the Senate's version of the "One Big Beautiful Bill" adds $500 billion more debt than the House's version is substantiated by credible sources. The Senate bill's projected increase in debt is significantly higher than that of the House bill, and the analysis from the CRFB supports the assertion that the Senate's version incurs at least $500 billion more in debt.

Sources

  1. One Big Beautiful Bill Act 119th Congress (2025-2026)
  2. Senate Bill Would Add at Least $3.3 Trillion to Debt, ...
  3. GOP megabill narrowly wins first test in the Senate. Here's ...
  4. Senate OBBBA Violates House Budget Instructions
  5. Senate Reconciliation Bill Could Add Over $4 Trillion to Debt

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Senate's version adds $500 billion more debt than House version!
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Senate's version adds $500 billion more debt than House version!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senate's version adds $500 billion more debt than House version!

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Senate's version will leave 11.8 million more uninsured by 2034!
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Senate's version will leave 11.8 million more uninsured by 2034!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senate's version will leave 11.8 million more uninsured by 2034!

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Senate's debt increase dwarfs House's $2.8 trillion estimate!
Needs Research

Fact Check: Senate's debt increase dwarfs House's $2.8 trillion estimate!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senate's debt increase dwarfs House's $2.8 trillion estimate!

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Senate's version could leave 11.8 million more uninsured by 2034!
Needs Research

Fact Check: Senate's version could leave 11.8 million more uninsured by 2034!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senate's version could leave 11.8 million more uninsured by 2034!

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Senate's bill could add $3.3 trillion in new debt over 10 years!
True

Fact Check: Senate's bill could add $3.3 trillion in new debt over 10 years!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senate's bill could add $3.3 trillion in new debt over 10 years!

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →