Fact Check: Resistance groups in Mariupol sabotage Russian military operations.

Fact Check: Resistance groups in Mariupol sabotage Russian military operations.

Published June 30, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Resistance groups in Mariupol sabotage Russian military operations." ## What We Know Resistance groups in Mariupol have been actively ...

Fact Check: "Resistance groups in Mariupol sabotage Russian military operations."

What We Know

Resistance groups in Mariupol have been actively involved in efforts to undermine Russian military operations. According to reports, these groups engage in various activities, including intelligence gathering and sabotage. For instance, residents of Mariupol have indicated that these resistance groups have disrupted railway lines into the city by setting fire to signaling boxes, which is a clear act of sabotage against military logistics (BBC). Furthermore, individuals involved in these groups have stated that their primary objective is to collect intelligence on Russian military movements, including the transportation of weapons and the status of military personnel, which they then relay to Ukrainian intelligence (BBC).

Analysis

The claim that resistance groups in Mariupol are sabotaging Russian military operations is supported by credible sources, including firsthand accounts from residents and reports from reputable news organizations. The BBC's investigation into the situation in Mariupol highlights the ongoing hardships faced by the residents under Russian occupation, while also shedding light on the clandestine activities of resistance groups (BBC).

The reliability of the BBC as a source is generally high, as it is a well-established international news organization known for its journalistic standards. The accounts from Mariupol residents, although anecdotal, provide a compelling narrative of resistance against the occupying forces. These residents have described their actions as a means of moral support for fellow Ukrainians and a way to maintain a semblance of resistance against the Russian military (BBC).

However, it is important to consider the potential for bias in reporting from both sides of the conflict. While the BBC aims for impartiality, the portrayal of resistance activities may be influenced by the broader narrative of Ukrainian resilience against Russian aggression. Nonetheless, the specific details provided about sabotage activities lend credibility to the claim.

Conclusion

Verdict: True. The evidence clearly indicates that resistance groups in Mariupol are actively involved in sabotaging Russian military operations. Their efforts to disrupt logistics and gather intelligence demonstrate a concerted resistance against the occupying forces, as corroborated by multiple credible sources.

Sources

  1. Ukraine war: Mariupol residents deny Russian stories ...
  2. Siege of Mariupol
  3. Ukrainian Resistance Targets Russian Intelligence ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
911 was a false flag. For the
first 10 years, I did not think
anything other than the
official narrative then after
being shown a video, a close up
video of building number seven
coming down and that got me
going because it's obvious to
me that building seven was was
a controlled demolition because
the building collapses from the
bottom down. The trade centers
were unique in that they were
designed to withstand the
00:33
impact of a a a jet. From what
I understand the the outer
skeleton of the building. The
outer columns was like a a fish
net and you had these inner
core columns which was
substantial thick steel beams
to withstand four or five times
what the loads were. Got it.
The engineers always over
design a building. No steel
frame building has ever
collapsed before or since 9/
eleven. So that should say
something right there. And it
said that building seven it was
01:05
aggressive collapse that it was
caused by fire but progressive
collapse unlike the twin
towers, the twin towers
collapse from the top down.
That's a progressive collapse.
Sure. Floor by floor by floor.
But if you look at the videos
of building seven collapsing,
it collapses uniformly, it's
collapsing from the bottom, the
building stays intact all the
way to the bottom of the ground
and you could see the sides
caving in on it. For a building
to collapse uniformly which the
video show all the load bearing
it would have to have failed
01:36
simultaneously. Now, fire
doesn't act like that. I came
across an analogy of the twin
towers and if you could
visualize cast iron stoves
stacked. One on top of each
other. The stoves up at the
top. Yes, there's fire and
they've been damaged but the
stoves on the bottom, they
haven't been damaged. Okay. So,
the structure underneath all of
that is intact. So, it's
impossible for a building to
collapse near free fall speed
and increase. Without a
02:07
controlled demolition. You're
running into the path of most
resistance. I something else is
going on. I don't believe that
it was just the planes or the
fires I think that and they
examine the dust and they found
what they call thermitic
material which is like a
explosive incendiary which was
in the dust samples and that's
documented. There were reports
of the buildings were
undergoing a extensive elevator
renovation in the two or three
years prior to all kinds of
02:40
workers they had access to the
the core the cores of the
building and on the day of the
attack the the elevator company
would not assist in the
operations of the elevators and
the elevator company was the
elevator company it
subsequently went out of
business and a couple of years
after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: China's military superiority will crush Taiwan's resistance in a conflict.
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: China's military superiority will crush Taiwan's resistance in a conflict.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: China's military superiority will crush Taiwan's resistance in a conflict.

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: China's military superiority could crush Taiwan's resistance in a war.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: China's military superiority could crush Taiwan's resistance in a war.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: China's military superiority could crush Taiwan's resistance in a war.

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: China's military superiority will crush Taiwanese resistance in a conflict.
Needs Research

Fact Check: China's military superiority will crush Taiwanese resistance in a conflict.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: China's military superiority will crush Taiwanese resistance in a conflict.

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
🔍
True

Fact Check: Civil wars can lead to the growth of armed resistance.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Civil wars can lead to the growth of armed resistance.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Varroa mites have evolved resistance to multiple classes of miticide since the 1980s.
True

Fact Check: Varroa mites have evolved resistance to multiple classes of miticide since the 1980s.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Varroa mites have evolved resistance to multiple classes of miticide since the 1980s.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →