Fact Check: "POGOs have been replaced by even more addictive online gambling."
What We Know
Philippine Offshore Gaming Operators (POGOs) have been a controversial topic in the Philippines, primarily due to their association with various illicit activities, including human trafficking and financial scams. Recently, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. announced a ban on POGOs, stating that their operations have been linked to severe criminal activities and have tarnished the country's image (BBC). The ban aims to shut down these operators by the end of the year, as they have been deemed detrimental to the moral fabric of the nation (BBC).
Following the ban on POGOs, concerns have been raised about the emergence of alternative online gambling platforms that may be even more addictive. Cardinal Pablo Virgilio David has highlighted that while POGOs have been outlawed, new online gambling platforms, referred to as "PIGOs" (Philippine Inland Gaming Operators), have taken their place. These platforms are reportedly more accessible and potentially more addictive than their predecessors, as they are available 24/7 and target a broader demographic, including young Filipinos (Crux Now).
Analysis
The claim that POGOs have been replaced by more addictive online gambling is supported by statements from credible sources. Cardinal David, a prominent figure in the Catholic Church in the Philippines, has publicly stated that the new online gambling platforms are "wrecking the lives of poor people who get addicted to it" (Crux Now). He emphasizes that these platforms utilize the same digital infrastructure as the now-banned POGOs, suggesting a continuity in the gambling culture despite the regulatory changes.
Moreover, reports indicate that state revenue from online gambling continues to grow even after the ban on POGOs, which implies that the demand for online gambling remains high (BusinessWorld). This persistence in gambling activity could indicate that while POGOs have been shut down, the underlying issues of addiction and accessibility have not been adequately addressed.
However, the reliability of the sources must be considered. While Cardinal David is a respected authority on social issues, his statements may carry a bias due to his position within the Church, which traditionally opposes gambling. Additionally, the media reports on the topic may vary in their framing, with some emphasizing the addiction aspect more than others.
Conclusion
The claim that "POGOs have been replaced by even more addictive online gambling" is Partially True. While it is accurate that new online gambling platforms have emerged following the ban on POGOs, the extent to which these platforms are more addictive is still a matter of debate. The evidence suggests a continuity of gambling culture, with new forms potentially exacerbating addiction issues, but further research and data would be necessary to fully substantiate the claim.
