Fact Check: On March 8th 2023 a bill was introduced to parliament to increase Old Age Security by 10% and to increase the amount they can make by 30%. The Bloc, Conservatives and NDP all voted in favor of this motion. Not a single member of the Liberal party did including our own Nova Scotia MP’s Kody Blois, Darrell Samson Sean Fraser Mike Kelloway Jaime Battiste Lena Metlege Diab Darren Fisher The bill was passed, regardless of Liberal Nays! This bill was slowed to a crawl by parliament despite it passing votes by members of Parliament. Then, on Oct 2nd 2024, 19 months later a motion was put in by parliament to get Bill C-319 royal accent. Again, The liberals tried to block it. Again, The Bloc, Conservatives and NDP all voted to pass this and it was passed. Unfortunately this session of parliament was shut down by the liberal government and this bill is now dead. So to every senior out there living on old age security and a low income job trying to make ends meet, you know who truly supports you.

April 16, 2025•by TruthOrFake

✓

VERDICT

Mostly True

# Claim Analysis: Bill C-319 and the Response of Canadian Political Parties ## 1. Introduction The claim states that on March 8, 2023, a bill (C-319)...

Claim Analysis: Bill C-319 and the Response of Canadian Political Parties

1. Introduction

The claim states that on March 8, 2023, a bill (C-319) was introduced in the Canadian Parliament to increase Old Age Security (OAS) by 10% and to raise the income exemption for seniors. It asserts that the Bloc Québécois, Conservatives, and NDP supported the bill, while no Liberal MPs voted in favor, including those from Nova Scotia. The claim further alleges that the bill faced delays and was ultimately blocked by the Liberal government, rendering it "dead" as of October 2, 2024.

2. What We Know

Bill C-319: Introduced on March 8, 2023, this bill proposed amendments to the Old Age Security Act, including a 10% increase in OAS for seniors aged 65 and older and an increase in the income exemption from $5,000 to $6,500 for the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) 2 3.
Voting Record: Reports indicate that the Bloc Québécois, Conservatives, and NDP voted in favor of the bill, while the majority of Liberals opposed it 5 6. Specific names of the Nova Scotia MPs mentioned in the claim are indeed Liberal members who voted against the bill 5.
Parliamentary Process: The bill required a royal recommendation to proceed, which was not granted initially, leading to delays in its passage 6. On October 2, 2024, a motion was introduced to expedite the royal assent for Bill C-319, but it was reportedly blocked by the Liberal government 5 6.
Current Status: As of the latest information available, the bill is considered "dead" due to the lack of royal assent and the dissolution of Parliament 5.

3. Analysis

Source Evaluation

Parliament of Canada: The official documents from the Parliament of Canada 2 6 are reliable as they provide direct information about the bill's content and legislative process.
OpenParliament.ca: This source provides a summary of the bill and is generally accurate, but it is important to note that it is computer-generated and may contain inaccuracies 3.
Global News and National Post: These news outlets reported on the voting patterns and the political dynamics surrounding the bill 5 7. While they are established news organizations, potential bias should be considered, especially regarding their framing of political events.
Wikipedia: The entry on candidates for the 2025 Canadian federal election 1 is not directly relevant to the claim but serves as a general context for understanding the political landscape. Wikipedia's reliability can vary, as it is user-edited, but it often cites credible sources.

Methodology and Evidence

The claim's narrative suggests a clear partisan divide, portraying the Liberals as obstructive to senior support initiatives. However, the evidence primarily comes from parliamentary voting records and news reports, which may reflect the political leanings of the reporting sources. The claim lacks detailed evidence of the motivations behind the Liberals' voting decisions, which would be helpful for a more nuanced understanding.

Conflicts of Interest

The claim appears to be politically charged, potentially aimed at discrediting the Liberal Party. It is essential to consider whether the sources of the claim have any political affiliations or agendas that could influence their portrayal of the events.

4. Conclusion

Verdict: Mostly True

The claim regarding Bill C-319 is mostly true based on the evidence available. The bill was indeed introduced to increase Old Age Security and the income exemption for seniors, and it received support from the Bloc Québécois, Conservatives, and NDP, while the majority of Liberal MPs opposed it. The assertion that the bill was ultimately blocked by the Liberal government and is now considered "dead" is also accurate.

However, the claim simplifies a complex political situation. While it highlights the partisan divide, it does not fully explore the reasons behind the Liberal Party's opposition or the broader context of the legislative process, including the requirement for royal recommendation. Additionally, the evidence primarily comes from voting records and media reports, which may carry inherent biases.

It is important to acknowledge that the political landscape can be fluid, and interpretations of events may vary. Readers should critically evaluate the information presented and consider multiple perspectives to gain a comprehensive understanding of the issue.

5. Sources

Candidates of the 2025 Canadian federal election - Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candidates_of_the_2025_Canadian_federal_election)
Private Member's Bill C-319 (44-1) - Parliament of Canada (https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/bill/C-319/first-reading)
Bill C-319 - openparliament.ca (https://openparliament.ca/bills/44-1/C-319/)
Vote Detail - 62 - Members of Parliament (https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en/votes/43/2/62)
Liberals vote against Bloc Quebecois’ old age security motion - National | Globalnews.ca (https://globalnews.ca/news/10791235/bloc-quebecois-pension-payments-possible-election/amp)
C-319 (44-1) - LEGISinfo - Parliament of Canada (https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/44-1/c-319)
Bloc giving Liberals 'a few days' to increase OAS for all seniors ... - National Post (https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/liberals-vote-against-bloc-motion-pension-payment)
Hansard No. 382 - 44-1 (https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/House/441/Debates/382/HAN382-E.PDF)
Liberals Kelloway, Battiste announce they will run in new federal ridings in N.S. | CBC News (https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/mike-kelloway-jaime-battiste-liberal-cape-breton-1.7490824)
Conservatives win 3 seats in Nova Scotia, unseating 2 Liberals (https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.6183078)

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:

"Coffee helps you live longer"

✓100% Free

✓No Registration

✓Instant Results

Comments

Loading comments...

Check another claim

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍

Mostly True

🎯 Similar

Fact Check: On March 8th 2023 a bill was introduced to parliament to increase Old Age Security by 10% and to increase the amount they can make by 30%. The Bloc, Conservatives and NDP all voted in favor of this motion. Not a single member of the Liberal party did including our own Nova Scotia MP’s Kody Blois, Darrell Samson Sean Fraser Mike Kelloway Jaime Battiste Lena Metlege Diab Darren Fisher The bill was passed, regardless of Liberal Nays! This bill was slowed to a crawl by parliament despite it passing votes by members of Parliament. Then, on Oct 2nd 2024, 19 months later a motion was put in by parliament to get Bill C-319 royal accent. Again, The liberals tried to block it. Again, The Bloc, Conservatives and NDP all voted to pass this and it was passed. Unfortunately this session of parliament was shut down by the liberal government and this bill is now dead. So to every senior out there living on old age security and a low income job trying to make ends meet, you know who truly supports you.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: On March 8th 2023 a bill was introduced to parliament to increase Old Age Security by 10% and to inc...

Fact Check: How nuts is Mark Carney? Perhaps nuttier than you think. Have a read of this piece in the Financial Post, by Matthew Lau. "Having left his gig as UN Special Envoy for Climate and Finance to lead the federal Liberal government, Mark Carney is now in a position to focus his and Greta Thunberg’s global climate crusade squarely on Canada. The crusade, Carney boasted back in 2021 while in his previous role, is worth many trillions of dollars. As he told CBC News at that year’s UN climate conference, “We have banks, asset managers, pension funds, insurance companies from around the world — more than 45 countries — and their total resources, totalling US$130 trillion” dedicated to transitioning the world’s economy away from fossil fuels. That dollar figure is higher than global GDP. Last month, Carney laid out Canada’s required contribution to his climate ambitions: “Canada must invest $2 trillion by 2050 — about $80 billion per year — to become carbon competitive and achieve Net Zero. However, investments in decarbonisation currently run between $10–20 billion annually.” The implication is that another $60-70 billion a year will need to be wrung out of Canadian businesses and consumers, either through direct taxation and government spending or with regulatory browbeating to push Canadians’ savings and investments into global warming initiatives. Carney has made no effort to hide his agenda to browbeat businesses into joining his and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade. In a 2021 interview he declared, “We need a sustainable economy, and is your business aligned with that? Are your hiring practices consistent with that? Are you developing people in a way that’s consistent with that? Ultimately, what’s being asked of businesses when it comes to climate is, do you have a plan for net-zero? Canada has a legislated objective for net zero alongside another 130 countries.” “A Swedish teenager,” Carney continued, referring to Thunberg, “can figure out the carbon budget and that we have less than 10 years and you have to get to net-zero to stabilize it and if you’re a company and you have purpose, well, what’s your plan? And all these plans need to come together.” This is utter insanity: under Justin Trudeau Canada suffered rapidly declining business investment and now his successor wants the country’s business leaders to take financial planning directives from Greta Thunberg. While the federal government barrels down the road to net-zero impoverishment for Canada, everyone else is looking for the exit ramp. In January, six of the largest U.S. banks — JPMorganChase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley — quit the Carney-led net-zero banking alliance. Canada’s Big Six Banks — RBC, TD Bank, BMO, Scotiabank, CIBC and National Bank — have quit the initiative as well. Even Europe is beginning to back off on government piling climate obligations onto businesses in the name of fighting global warming. As the Wall Street Journal reports, the EU is watering down its climate accounting policies “amid pushback from member states and companies within the bloc over the new rules, which they say would have increased costs and reduced the competitiveness of their business.” Specifically, regulations previously scheduled for this year would have forced companies “to report in detail on their environmental, social and corporate-governance performance while making significant cuts to the emissions from within their supply chain.” The EU is now dropping, weakening or postponing many of these climate regulations, so that businesses will be able to better “grow, innovate, and create quality jobs.” This is effectively an admission that piling climate obligations and environmental reporting mandates onto businesses prevents them from growing, innovating and creating good jobs. Unfortunately, Mark Carney is all about climate obligations and reporting mandates. The road Canada is currently marching down for climate-related financial disclosures is based on a framework proposed by a task force Carney initiated in 2015. His aforementioned Thunberg-praising interview was not with an environmental journalist, but with Pivot Magazine, which is published by CPA Canada, the accounting industry’s national association. “We cannot get to net-zero without proper climate reporting,” he insisted, speaking of the need for “one core global standard” for climate accounting and reporting. A global climate reporting standard to help push trillions of dollars — yes, trillions with a “T” — from Canadian workers and taxpayers into Mark Carney and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade? After a decade of Justin Trudeau’s ruinous policies weakening Canada from coast to coast, there could be little worse for the country and its economy than a Liberal government led by Mark Carney." The Financial Post Cape Breton Politics Jason Boudreau · 1h · Big numbers in unions. 😁😁

Detailed fact-check analysis of: How nuts is Mark Carney? Perhaps nuttier than you think. Have a read of this piece in the Financia...

Fact Check: How nuts is Mark Carney? Perhaps nuttier than you think. Have a read of this piece in the Financial Post, by Matthew Lau. "Having left his gig as UN Special Envoy for Climate and Finance to lead the federal Liberal government, Mark Carney is now in a position to focus his and Greta Thunberg’s global climate crusade squarely on Canada. The crusade, Carney boasted back in 2021 while in his previous role, is worth many trillions of dollars. As he told CBC News at that year’s UN climate conference, “We have banks, asset managers, pension funds, insurance companies from around the world — more than 45 countries — and their total resources, totalling US$130 trillion” dedicated to transitioning the world’s economy away from fossil fuels. That dollar figure is higher than global GDP. Last month, Carney laid out Canada’s required contribution to his climate ambitions: “Canada must invest $2 trillion by 2050 — about $80 billion per year — to become carbon competitive and achieve Net Zero. However, investments in decarbonisation currently run between $10–20 billion annually.” The implication is that another $60-70 billion a year will need to be wrung out of Canadian businesses and consumers, either through direct taxation and government spending or with regulatory browbeating to push Canadians’ savings and investments into global warming initiatives. Carney has made no effort to hide his agenda to browbeat businesses into joining his and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade. In a 2021 interview he declared, “We need a sustainable economy, and is your business aligned with that? Are your hiring practices consistent with that? Are you developing people in a way that’s consistent with that? Ultimately, what’s being asked of businesses when it comes to climate is, do you have a plan for net-zero? Canada has a legislated objective for net zero alongside another 130 countries.” “A Swedish teenager,” Carney continued, referring to Thunberg, “can figure out the carbon budget and that we have less than 10 years and you have to get to net-zero to stabilize it and if you’re a company and you have purpose, well, what’s your plan? And all these plans need to come together.” This is utter insanity: under Justin Trudeau Canada suffered rapidly declining business investment and now his successor wants the country’s business leaders to take financial planning directives from Greta Thunberg. While the federal government barrels down the road to net-zero impoverishment for Canada, everyone else is looking for the exit ramp. In January, six of the largest U.S. banks — JPMorganChase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley — quit the Carney-led net-zero banking alliance. Canada’s Big Six Banks — RBC, TD Bank, BMO, Scotiabank, CIBC and National Bank — have quit the initiative as well. Even Europe is beginning to back off on government piling climate obligations onto businesses in the name of fighting global warming. As the Wall Street Journal reports, the EU is watering down its climate accounting policies “amid pushback from member states and companies within the bloc over the new rules, which they say would have increased costs and reduced the competitiveness of their business.” Specifically, regulations previously scheduled for this year would have forced companies “to report in detail on their environmental, social and corporate-governance performance while making significant cuts to the emissions from within their supply chain.” The EU is now dropping, weakening or postponing many of these climate regulations, so that businesses will be able to better “grow, innovate, and create quality jobs.” This is effectively an admission that piling climate obligations and environmental reporting mandates onto businesses prevents them from growing, innovating and creating good jobs. Unfortunately, Mark Carney is all about climate obligations and reporting mandates. The road Canada is currently marching down for climate-related financial disclosures is based on a framework proposed by a task force Carney initiated in 2015. His aforementioned Thunberg-praising interview was not with an environmental journalist, but with Pivot Magazine, which is published by CPA Canada, the accounting industry’s national association. “We cannot get to net-zero without proper climate reporting,” he insisted, speaking of the need for “one core global standard” for climate accounting and reporting. A global climate reporting standard to help push trillions of dollars — yes, trillions with a “T” — from Canadian workers and taxpayers into Mark Carney and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade? After a decade of Justin Trudeau’s ruinous policies weakening Canada from coast to coast, there could be little worse for the country and its economy than a Liberal government led by Mark Carney." The Financial Post Cape Breton Politics Jason Boudreau · 1h · Big numbers in unions. 😁😁

Detailed fact-check analysis of: How nuts is Mark Carney? Perhaps nuttier than you think. Have a read of this piece in the Financia...

Mar 25, 2025

🔍

Unverified

Fact Check: How nuts is Mark Carney? Perhaps nuttier than you think. Have a read of this piece in the Financial Post, by Matthew Lau. "Having left his gig as UN Special Envoy for Climate and Finance to lead the federal Liberal government, Mark Carney is now in a position to focus his and Greta Thunberg’s global climate crusade squarely on Canada. The crusade, Carney boasted back in 2021 while in his previous role, is worth many trillions of dollars. As he told CBC News at that year’s UN climate conference, “We have banks, asset managers, pension funds, insurance companies from around the world — more than 45 countries — and their total resources, totalling US$130 trillion” dedicated to transitioning the world’s economy away from fossil fuels. That dollar figure is higher than global GDP. Last month, Carney laid out Canada’s required contribution to his climate ambitions: “Canada must invest $2 trillion by 2050 — about $80 billion per year — to become carbon competitive and achieve Net Zero. However, investments in decarbonisation currently run between $10–20 billion annually.” The implication is that another $60-70 billion a year will need to be wrung out of Canadian businesses and consumers, either through direct taxation and government spending or with regulatory browbeating to push Canadians’ savings and investments into global warming initiatives. Carney has made no effort to hide his agenda to browbeat businesses into joining his and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade. In a 2021 interview he declared, “We need a sustainable economy, and is your business aligned with that? Are your hiring practices consistent with that? Are you developing people in a way that’s consistent with that? Ultimately, what’s being asked of businesses when it comes to climate is, do you have a plan for net-zero? Canada has a legislated objective for net zero alongside another 130 countries.” “A Swedish teenager,” Carney continued, referring to Thunberg, “can figure out the carbon budget and that we have less than 10 years and you have to get to net-zero to stabilize it and if you’re a company and you have purpose, well, what’s your plan? And all these plans need to come together.” This is utter insanity: under Justin Trudeau Canada suffered rapidly declining business investment and now his successor wants the country’s business leaders to take financial planning directives from Greta Thunberg. While the federal government barrels down the road to net-zero impoverishment for Canada, everyone else is looking for the exit ramp. In January, six of the largest U.S. banks — JPMorganChase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley — quit the Carney-led net-zero banking alliance. Canada’s Big Six Banks — RBC, TD Bank, BMO, Scotiabank, CIBC and National Bank — have quit the initiative as well. Even Europe is beginning to back off on government piling climate obligations onto businesses in the name of fighting global warming. As the Wall Street Journal reports, the EU is watering down its climate accounting policies “amid pushback from member states and companies within the bloc over the new rules, which they say would have increased costs and reduced the competitiveness of their business.” Specifically, regulations previously scheduled for this year would have forced companies “to report in detail on their environmental, social and corporate-governance performance while making significant cuts to the emissions from within their supply chain.” The EU is now dropping, weakening or postponing many of these climate regulations, so that businesses will be able to better “grow, innovate, and create quality jobs.” This is effectively an admission that piling climate obligations and environmental reporting mandates onto businesses prevents them from growing, innovating and creating good jobs. Unfortunately, Mark Carney is all about climate obligations and reporting mandates. The road Canada is currently marching down for climate-related financial disclosures is based on a framework proposed by a task force Carney initiated in 2015. His aforementioned Thunberg-praising interview was not with an environmental journalist, but with Pivot Magazine, which is published by CPA Canada, the accounting industry’s national association. “We cannot get to net-zero without proper climate reporting,” he insisted, speaking of the need for “one core global standard” for climate accounting and reporting. A global climate reporting standard to help push trillions of dollars — yes, trillions with a “T” — from Canadian workers and taxpayers into Mark Carney and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade? After a decade of Justin Trudeau’s ruinous policies weakening Canada from coast to coast, there could be little worse for the country and its economy than a Liberal government led by Mark Carney." The Financial Post

Detailed fact-check analysis of: How nuts is Mark Carney? Perhaps nuttier than you think. Have a read of this piece in the Financia...

Mar 23, 2025

Mostly True

Fact Check: In a lot of cases, you were stuck out there another few months to over a year on occupation duty as well. The last western front Americans to return home didn't hit American soil until March of 1920.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In a lot of cases, you were stuck out there another few months to over a year on occupation duty as ...

Apr 13, 2025

Partially True

Fact Check: In a lot of cases, you were stuck out there another few months to over a year on occupation duty as well. The last western front Americans to return home didn't hit American soil until March of 1920.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In a lot of cases, you were stuck out there another few months to over a year on occupation duty as ...

Apr 13, 2025

Explore All Fact Checks

Claim Analysis: Bill C-319 and the Response of Canadian Political Parties

1. Introduction

2. What We Know

3. Analysis

Source Evaluation

Methodology and Evidence

Conflicts of Interest

4. Conclusion

5. Sources

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

More Fact Checks to Explore

Fact Check: In a lot of cases, you were stuck out there another few months to over a year on occupation duty as well. The last western front Americans to return home didn't hit American soil until March of 1920.

Fact Check: In a lot of cases, you were stuck out there another few months to over a year on occupation duty as well. The last western front Americans to return home didn't hit American soil until March of 1920.